“highly significant”

The global effect of both species and exposure (sun/shade) on the physiological variables of field samples was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The difference in mortality between VRE patients (18.9%) and non-VRE patients (6.4%) is statistically highly significant (RR 2.97, 95% CI 2.06, 4.29, p < 0.001). 3.10 Admission to intensive care unit A total of 27,839 patients were associated with Enterococcus spp.

* P < 0.05 statistically significant; ** P < 0.01 highly significant; and *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 extremely significant.

Strn +/‐ mice showed highly significant increases in laser‐induced thrombosis ( P <0.001), as shown by increased platelet accumulation and fibrin deposition.

Notably, non-responding LTRs had markedly lower antibody levels compared to responding LTRs, with highly significant differences observed for both Wuhan anti-S and anti-Omicron IgG (128.2 BAU/mL vs. 1161 BAU/mL, p = 0.001, and 6.7 AU/mL vs. 144 AU/mL, p = 0.001, respectively).

Highly significant differences ( P < .001) among the entries, parents and offspring were recorded for almost all traits.

The influence on survival of an ALC < 1.2 × 10 9 /l in this group was highly significant (mean OS 36 vs. 56 months, p = 0.001; Fig. 1b ).

There was a highly significant tendency of the BV-positive samples to sort to the polymicrobial clade and BV negative samples to the Lactobacillus clade based on either the Amsel ( p < 0.001) or Nugent BV diagnosis ( p < 0.001).

The interaction terms, including pHTemp, pHConc, and TempConc, highlight significant combined effects, with the TempConc interaction being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Pairwise comparisons revealed a highly significant difference between EU-TIRADS 4 without BWCF and both EU-TIRADS 4 with BWCF ( P < 0.001) and EU-TIRADS 3 ( P < 0.001).

The sex difference between females and males showing the secondary sex signs was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Comparisons between nephrographic and excretory phases show a highly significant difference in scores in favor of excretory phase for criterion C2 (renal pelvis/calyxes) ( p < 0.001) and a significant difference in scores for criterion C3 (proximal ureters) ( p = 0.021).

Treatment modality was a highly significant predictor, with the Digital and AI group showing greater improvement compared with the Conventional group (β = 8.62, 95% CI: 6.75–10.49; p < 0.001).

We find highly significant reductions (P< 0.001) in ARF expression during disease progression from normal oesophageal epithelium to Barrett's Oesophagus to adenocarcinoma, with 57/76 (75%) adenocarcinomas displaying undetectable levels of ARF expression.

When we assessed the impact of the intervention on different weaning practices indicators among participants, the outcome of interest was the remarkable increase in the percentage of our targeted objectives, exceeding our expectations with highly significant difference between pre- and post-interventional village and between post-interventional and control villages ( P = 0.001).

Overall, the combined pathology scores of rMERS-CoV MA-DUBneg -vaccinated animals were generally lower than for mock-vaccinated animals (Supplementary Fig 5B ) and the difference between the means of both groups was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001, unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test).

All comparisons between uncoated and coated samples across LDH Day 2, LDH Day 7, ALP Day 7, and Mineralization were highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating substantial differences between the two groups.

Statistical significance levels are denoted as follows, p -value <0.05: statistically significant (∗), p -value <0.01: highly significant (∗∗), p -value <0.001: strongly significant (∗∗∗).

Similarly, there was a highly significant and positive correlation ( p < 0.001, r = 0.946) between number of pods per plant and number of peduncles with pods.

The Kruskal–Wallis test, on the other hand, showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) CN variation of all genes across breeds, with a slightly lower significance ( P = 0.003) for HSFY ( Table 2 ).

Also, there was highly significant decrease in viability (75±6.8 vs. 89±4.1; P =0.001 and 74±7.5 vs. 89±4.1; P =0.001), capacity (30.1±2.1 vs. 39.2±3.3; P =0.001 and 22.3±3.3 vs. 39.2±3.3; P =0.001) and MMP (60.13±2.494 vs. 75.73±3.494; P =0.001 and 55.44±3.09 vs. 75.73±3.494; P =0.001) in asthenozoospermia and astheno-teratozoospermia groups than normozoospermia group.

The function “overdisp” in the package “sjstats” (Lüdecke, 2018 ) returned a highly significant dispersion ratio for the Poisson model (Pearson's χ 2 = 99,728.804, p ‐value < 0.001), and the function “zero_count” in “sjstats,” which tests for zero count overfitting, returned 117 observed zero counts versus 0 predicted zero counts.

The scale was regarded highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.830 for the scale and ranging from 0.824 to 0.882 for the subscales; item‐scale and item‐total correlations were reported to be highly significant = p < 0.001) and valid (CFI = 0.990; TLI = 0.983; RMSEA = 0.045) (Husain, Kamal, et al. 2025 ).

9%, P < 0.05) per fresh transfer and per frozen-thawed embryo derived from GH cycles leading to a highly significant productivity rate (30 vs. 14%, P < 0.001).

In contrast, patients without graft loss experienced a highly significant drop of absolute viremia between baseline and months 3 ( p < 0.001), 6 ( p < 0.001), and 12 ( p < 0.001).