“highly significant”

( 17 ) found in 38 patients undergoing biopsy for a variety of liver diseases a highly significant correlation between liver histology and MRI determination of %HFF, particularly with macrovesicular steatosis ( r = 0.92, P < 0.001).

While all sources of variation exerted a highly significant effect (p < 0.001), the difference among accessions within geographical populations accounted for most of the variation (68.3%), whereas only 6% was explained by the difference among the geographical populations.

The interactions between tannin type and concentration (T × C) and tannin type and water level (T × W) were both highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the analyzed variables except for dCP_BP ( p = 0.157), while the interaction between tannin concentrations and water level (C × W) was insignificant in all variables.

The differences in frequency of pathogen type between non-food animal and food animal associated EIZDs is statistically highly significant (Chi square: 18.2, p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant association (p<0.001) between admission status (ward vs ICU) and symptom severity across the five categories.

A three factor ANOVA testing for the effects of zeitgeber period, day length and genotype on the phase of E activity (done for T22 to T28) revealed highly significant effects of all factors on the timing of E activity, zeitgeber period: F (3,663) = 496.96; p < .001; day length: F (2,663) = 2943.38; p < .001; genotype: F (1,663) = 2716.92; p < .001.

This habitat-driven structure was verified with a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) test on the NMDS1 & NMDS2 coordinates, with habitat being a highly significant variable ( p < 0.001) in explaining the variance in the combined NMDS coordinate distributions and each coordinate separately.

Positive associations for PTs were consistently validated via both ROR and PRR, with results being highly significant ( P < 0.001) (Additional file 1: Table S20).

NCAM1 was found to be associated with four neuropathic pain‐related GWAS traits in humans, two of which were highly significant with a p < 0.001 (Tables 2 and 3 ).

Its amplitude is more expressed when the target was present (M = -1.72, SD = 2.01), to when it was absent (M = .28, SD = 1.77), and this impression was confirmed by the rmANOVA with a highly significant main effect of target presence (F(1, 26) = 21.90, p < .001, n p 2 = .457).

Though these numbers appear similar, the difference is highly significant ( P <0.001) due to the extremely large sample sizes.

The hematologic recovery (following the withdrawal of rEPO) with and without immunosuppressive therapy was highly significant (57% vs. 2%, respectively, P < 0.001); and nearly 95% had complete recovery following renal transplantation ( n = 19 cases).

Individual comparison showed that the Component*Group interaction, not significant when comparing Controls and AD-NL (F=1,18; df: 3, 54; p=0,32), was highly significant in the contrast between Controls and AD-AL (F=10,73; df: 3, 57; p=0,001).

The mean rostrocaudal extent of the AC calculated from all animals in all groups was 1767 μm on the left and 1590 μm on the right hemisphere, leading to a highly significant difference (paired t -test, p < 0.001).

>60 years old) showed a change in DNA methylation levels of >15 % at only 75 CpG sites, none of which were highly significant ( p < 0.001) [ 64 ].

As the difference in age was highly significant between the groups [ F (3, 186) = 101, p < 0.001], it was included as a covariate. 3.2 Results for the main hypotheses In the total sample, the SC-IAT showed high internal consistency (adjusted r = 0.87), in line with our hypothesis ( H1 ).

Additionally, the ANOVA showed that the main effect of tone presence was highly significant ( F (1,24) = 20.48, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.46).

Results remained highly significant when only the five randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were considered (RR = 1.76, CI 1.65–1.88; p = 0.001).

Lesion location The Welch ANOVA results reveal highly significant differences in both SE ( F = 5.02, p < 0.001) and SP ( F = 3.37, p < 0.001) across IOCs, IOSs, radiography, and visual methods, indicating that the diagnostic performance of these tools varies significantly depending on the lesion type and diagnostic metrics.

Both difference were found to be highly significant by applying a generalized linear model in R (p < 0.001) 64 .

In the depression model for females, age and income were found to be highly significant (p < 0.001).

Morphometric results The measuring of the percentage % number of ovarian follicles of the neonatal rats (PND 4); showed a highly significant decrease in the average percentage of the primordial and early primary in the GA3-treated group in comparison with other study groups ( P <0.001), then showed a significant increase again ( P <0.05) after Se combined treatment in comparison with control group ( Fig. 2E ).

As illustrated in Table 4 , each additional painful body region was moderately associated with higher distress and fatigue: MSD_Count correlated with GHQ_Total (ρ = 0.43) and SOFI_Total (ρ = 0.53), both highly significant (p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis confirmed that differences in sensitivity rates between fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin were highly significant (p < 0.001).

Across-environment ANOVA showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) for environments, genotypes, and genotype × environment interaction (GE) for all traits studied.