In fact, the chi-square goodness of fit test for the first ten bases flanking the 11 CR1s containing one perfect octomer and intact ORF2s and 3' UTRs was highly significant ( X 2 = 39.5; P < 0.001) suggesting that the occurrence of specific bases within those first ten flanking positions was not random.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Differences were regarded as significant if probability value P < 0.05 and highly significant if P < 0.001.[ 19 ] R ESULTS Morphological characterization with phase-contrast microscopy On the 1 st day of the primary culture of BM-MSCs, Passage 0 (P0) revealed rounded, crowded, and floating cells, while 3–4 days later, most of the cells were adherent in the form of spindle and triangular cells with processes, yet few cells appeared rounded [ Figure 1a ].
The applied irrigation treatments and walnut cultivars exhibited highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) on both parameters.
All of the correlations were positive and highly significant ( P < 0.001), especially for those among the lengths of limb bones.
Moreover, the effect size of the latter interaction was large, corresponding to an 11-point greater BDI-II increase with each log-unit of increased IL-6 for men than women, a highly significant finding ( p = 0.001).
U showing highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
Apart from alcoholism, highly significant associations were also found in the subgroups of patients with AST > 37 U/L (OR 1.038, 95% C.I. 1.015–1.063, P = 0.001) and bilirubin > 0.8 mg/dL (OR 1.042, 95% C.I. 1.017–1.068, P = 0.001, Fig. 2 ).
Alt displayed the greatest resistance to desiccation, losing only 19% of its fresh weight, compared to 37% for CW and 46% for RB ( Figure 1 A): a consequence of the highly significant ( p < 0.001) cultivar by desiccation period interaction on fresh-weight loss.
The traditional change between visits 2 and 3 was of borderline significance in both groups, but the addition of the then-test again led to highly significant actual change (p < 0.001 in both groups).
The KMO measure of sampling adequacy of the data was 0.96, and Bartlett’s test was highly significant ( χ 2 =3006.5, p<0.001).
The T-test revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in lesion scores between infected birds (mean score: 4.585) and the control group (mean score: 1.33).
The difference in the proportion of agreement between pedodontists and nonpedodontists was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Patients’ total NMSS and most of its domains showed highly significant worse NMSs compared to controls (p < 0.001).
Tick mean abundance was significantly different among habitats, the effect of the transect as a random factor being highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all three models (i.e., for the two dominant species and the host community).
The difference was found to be highly significant statistically (p = 0.001).
The difference in PRAME-positive cells/mm 2 between SSM and DN was highly significant ( p < 0.001; Table 2 ).
The sensitivity of CHIKV E2 envelope protein was higher than that of CHIKV E1 envelope protein, even though there was a highly significant correlation in the seroreactivity between CHIKV E1 and E2 envelope protein for anti-CHIKV positive serum samples ( p < 0.001).
Apart from the QSAR‐based SSD σ based on NOECs, all formulae were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
McNemar's test results were highly significant between the species specific test and the single ITS1 based tests (χ 2 = 10.7, df = 1, p = 0.001), and between Species specific test and the nested ITS 1 & 2 test (χ 2 = 14.44, df = 1, p = 0.0001) indicating a disagreement between the tests.
Upon quantification of the coverage area percentage of the collagen fibers, the increase of collagen in the case of the three concentrations was highly significant ( P < 0.001), compared to the control (Fig. 6 ).
Results were considered statistically significant for P < .05 and statistically highly significant for P < .001.
The difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001) using the one-way ANOVA test ( Table 3B ).
The association is highly significant (R 2 = 0.56, p<0.001).
Even when the results of the largest study (DECLARE) was removed, the result remained highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The present study showed that in the cholestyramine group, the decrease in median serum phosphorus levels was highly significant (p < 0.001): from 6.6 mg/dl at baseline to 4.6 mg/dl at the end of month 2 (end of study).