“highly significant”

The analysis also showed that these effects were interdependent: the interaction between the two factors was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and blocking UV decreased attack rates in sp items (with more eyespots) but increased attack rates in wt items (with fewer eyespots) ( Fig. 3 ).

Statistically significant results were denoted by a value of P < 0.05, while the results were considered highly significant when value of P < 0.001 was obtained.

Results On comparing sialic acid levels among the three groups, stage 2 showed the highest mean (8.61) compared with the other two groups and was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Women exhibit a significantly higher percentage of acute medical conditions (34.5%) compared to men (21.2%), with the difference being statistically significant ( p = 0.025.) This trend is also observed in chronic medical conditions, where women have a much higher percentage (50.6%) compared to men (20.7%), with the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In women however, even though the DCSI-CC score in the occupational sector “Health sector, social work, teaching and education” was among the lowest, there was a highly significant increase in the odds of having a higher DCSI-CC score in p4 compared to p1 (OR = 1,12, p<0,001) ( Fig 4 ).

Conversely, the iodine and acid values were significant (p < 0.05) but saponification and ester values were higher and highly significant (p < 0.001) in native.

The chemical-genetic interaction of the positive control methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), a well-characterized antifungal agent that damages DNA [ 28 ], demonstrated a highly significant enrichment ( P value ≤ 0.001) for cellular response to DNA damage stimulus, confirming a successful HIP-HOP assay procedure and accurate post-sequencing data analysis.

Many authors define the cutoff value of the normal ONSD as (5 mm) which supports our cutoff point gained from the control group to compare it with the corresponding values of the patients.[ 9 13 ] The current study found a highly significant statistical correlation between ONSD with direct measurement of ICP ( R = 0.933 and P < 0.001), this result goes with the latest studies done in Rome, Italy, that was performed in 2017 by Toscano et al. whose found a strong correlation between ONSD and ICP ( R = 0.895 and P < 0.001).[ 14 ] Another

This highly significant constant ( p < 0.001) reinforces the robustness of the model in predicting MetS status. 4.

The results indicated highly significant improvements in all 14 physical and cortical functional assessments by the end of the PAC program ( P < 0.001).

Lead and Cd were highly significant (p = 0.001), followed by Fe.

Patients in the azithromycin arm had a 4.4% improvement on their FEV 1 as compared to a 1.8% decrease in patients in the placebo arm—a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001).

The difference between pre-operative and post-operative BCVA was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The analysis of the clinical attachment level (CAL) results indicated that the Group factor was highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas Time ( p = 0.555) and the Group vs.

As can be noted, there was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) interaction between job task and age.

In a trend test, i.e., using the number of patient transfers as a continuous variable, it was also highly significant in relation to back injury events ( p < 0.001).

Analysis of Variance The ANOVA results for mean square values showed highly significant differences ( p ≥ 0.001) among genotypes for all destructively measured morpho-physiological traits and SRIs in each season and combined two seasons ( Table 1 ).

The length of the periods between throws in the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions did not differ (Wilcoxon Z = 1.01, p =0.311) and correlated at highly significant level (Spearman R = 0.88, p < 0.001).

All regions showed highly significant deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for heterozygote deficits considering the p -value < 0.001.

There was a highly significant moderate negative correlation between the NHPT durations and the ALFRS-R: handwriting scores ( r = −0.53, p < 0.001).

PP values: T1 showed a highly significant increase in PP in the first test compared to the pre-test ( p = 0.001), and was significantly higher than the CON ( p = 0.025).

When all the clinical characteristics were included in the logistic regression analysis, the regression model remained highly significant (p < 0.001), and the accuracy of the model increased to 93.3%.

Considering total scale scores and correlation of the subscales of the scale, reliability coefficients ranged from r=0.54 to r=0.78; the correlation was positive, strong and highly significant (p<0.001) ( Table 2 ).

This trend was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for the age groups from 14 to 19 years.

A multi-variable analysis of data from van de Vijver and colleagues [ 3 ] clearly shows a highly significant decrease in hazard of recurrence in patients treated with chemotherapy in comparison with those who received no chemotherapy (hazard ratio of 0.37; P < 0.001).