“highly significant”

This study revealed a highly significant correlation between vitamin D concentrations and AFC ( p < 0.001).

Firstly, the main interaction between value type and value level was highly significant, F (2,108) = 22.3, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.292.

This difference is highly significant ( p < 0.001) and is a strong indication for a role of CRY in Rhodopsin-based light transduction that is independent of CRY’s own photoreceptive capabilities.

There are highly significant differences between the two gender distributions according to the global academic results (p<0.001), but also significant differences (p<0.005) between the distributions of the two genders according to the academic results from the last attended examination session.

The χ 2-test value, for all tested traits, shows the difference in the variability between control and children with FS and this difference is highly significant (Σ X 2 cn/fs = 109.02; p <0.001), which shows that it is their genetic dispositions that differ.

The percentage of inflammation in the group (Carr) was increased progressively, and in a highly significant ( p < 0.001) way over time, it was increased from 65% at the first hour to 120% at the 6th hour.

The difference in referring department between PRP-Yes and PRP-No groups was highly significant ( P < .001).

Differences were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05 (∗), very significant when p ≤ 0.01 (∗∗), and highly significant when p ≤ 0.001 (∗∗∗).

In accordance, our study demonstrated a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in the technique’s performance by using a red instead of a brown chromogen in primary melanomas.

In all genotypes, the linear regression between both water indicators was highly significant ( p < 0.001), but not very strong (r 2 ranging from 0.61 to 0.80) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

This is also seen in the mixed model, where a distinct and highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in IOV is seen with increasing levels of healthcare professional support immediately after the death.

napus seeds show a highly significant negative correlation ( r = −0.22, P < 0.001) in the natural population (Figure S6 ).

In contrast, analysis of US specimens yielded a highly significant result ( r statistic = 0.515, p = 0.001).

The result was highly significant ( p < .001; one-tailed).

There was no correlation of residual enzyme activity to severity, clinical presentation, liver function tests, liver biopsy findings or outcome apart from highly significant correlation with repeated chest infections ( P = 0.001).

For both disease-related traits, developmental stage had a highly significant and large effect (AUDPS: p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.987; AUSIPS: p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.967), with mature postbolting plants having significantly larger values for both variables ( post hoc sequential Bonferroni tests: p < 0.001), followed by bolting and juvenile prebolting, being equal for the two variables ( post hoc sequential Bonferroni tests: p ≥ 0.455).

In contrast, genotype×N treatment interactions were only highly significant ( P <0.001) for GW and GPE at Dundee and never approached significance for any of the traits scored at Halle, suggesting a general absence of differential N treatment effects upon the genotypes studied.

pygmaea groups was highly significant ( R = 1, p = 0.001 for both tests).

Their pooled heat map indicated that they preferred to stay in the CS+ arm (Figure 5H ) and the quantitative analysis of the time spent in each arm of the maze revealed a highly significant preference for the CS+ arm (Figure 5I ; U = 148, p < 0.001).

Based on diagnosis criteria, there was a highly significant difference in MUAC P value < 0.001) but not for WHZ ( p = 0.056).

However, McNemar Chi-square test in the nonsusceptible category between the two tests was 9.38% and 33.03% for imipenem and meropenem, respectively, and they were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The differences between the MA and SA patterns and between the LA and SA patterns were highly significant (both P < 0.001).

Moreover, codeine consumption in the first, second and third months after surgery was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group than in the control group, with highly significant time*group interactions; P < 0.001, F = 31 and df = 1.7 (Fig. 5 ).

Assessment of Model Fit The results of the Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients are highly significant ( x 2 (38) = 378.1, p < 0.001), indicating that the final model is significantly better than the baseline model.

The difference in the percentages of sand flies entering the two types of treated bednets was highly significant (c 2 = 114.9, p <0.001).