However, three variables were found to have highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) with TCL at every scale and region assessed—FDI (positively correlated at each scale/region), percent of rural population (negatively correlated at each scale/region with a slightly weaker correlation in Africa [p < 0.01]), and GDP per capita (positively correlated across scales/regions except for Africa, which was negatively correlated at the p < 0.01 level) (Supplementary Figs.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
PDT treatment led to a highly significant size ( P < 0.001) reduction of the mucosal lesion starting from 14 days after PDT (day 28; Fig. 2a,c ) that correlated with a significant improvement of the ABSIS I score ( P < 0.05) at days 42 and 56 (Fig. 2b ).
The inversion also showed a sex-specific effect on the duration of the larval stage, with no significant difference among female genotypes (on average, αα: 9.0 days, αβ: 8.7 days, ββ: 9.0 days; glmm p = 0.57) but highly significant differences among males (glmm p < 0.001, Fig. 2b Supplementary Table 5 , Supplementary Fig. 3 ).
All predictors of foraging habitat quality in the additive model were highly significant (p < 0.001; Table 2 ), with 51.1% deviance explained by the model, and over 99% of which was explained by the model’s fixed effects.
The average Pearson coefficient across the 11 candidate genes was r = 0.970, which indicates a highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) correlation between gene expression levels obtained from microarray and qRT-PCR analyses.
ROC curve analysis determined a highly significant diagnostic performance to distinguish between healthy controls and metastatic prostate cancer patients with an AUC of 0.94, a CI between 0.84-1 and a p -value < 0.001 ( Figure 6 C, black curve).
AMOVA indicated highly significant population structure between the seven regions ( p < .001) for both panels (all SNPs or only neutral SNPs) and both the datasets including and excluding Chesapeake Bay (Table 2 ).
6 ), the results revealed a highly significant reduction in DFS in 140 patients with high‐risk AMLo expression compared with 239 patients with low‐risk AMLo expression [85·5% vs. 98·3%; ( P < 0·001); Fig. 6 a].
Highly significant differences (p < 0.001) were found at the different plant growth stages, watering regime (WR) within plant growth stage, and day within WR and plant growth stage.
STATISTICS The authors found highly significant, yet moderate Spearman correlations ( r s = 0.41, P < .001) between raters.
Correlations between the study variables In the comparisons of the means of the different cultivars and treatments, there were highly significant correlations ( P < 0.001) between in-vitro AOP and TPC, in-vitro AOP and TFC, and TPC and TFC (Table 1 ).
Analysis of stroma enriched samples also revealed that SPARC and COLIA1 expression in the stromal compartments of both primary and metastatic tumour were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) while these targets were only significantly enriched in metastatic tumours in whole biopsy analysis.
The time of first walk The day of first walk was earlier among the ACB group (mean = 1.38) than the CEA group (mean = 2.80) with a highly significant difference ( P = 0.001).
In the post-test period, there was a highly significant difference between the means of hemoglobin and hematocrit levels of the intervention group compared to those of the control group (p-value <0.001), on medium effect of intervention program.
The association between mother/mother’s substitute and malnutrition was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The type of school had highly significant ( P < 0.001) influence on the impact of permanent anterior teeth fracture on OHRQoL with negative OHRQoL among the corporation schools.
Reliability For the test-retest interval of 13 to 14 months, Pearson’s correlations of the DISC sum scores revealed a highly significant positive correlation ( r (36) = .61, p < .001).
Group differences in neurocognitive function The MANOVA on group differences in neurocognitive function was highly significant for Group (F(16,176) = 3.78, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.256).
However, the main effect of image category was highly significant ( F [1, 76] = 158.38, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.67), and the interaction of age group and image category was also significant ( F [3, 76] = 3.19, p = 0.028, η 2 = 0.11).
Significance levels were denoted as follows: P < 0.05 indicates significant differences, P < 0.01 denotes highly significant differences, while P < 0.001 signifies extremely significant differences, and P > 0.05 suggests a lack of significant differences.
The relationship between loneliness and compulsive internet use remained highly significant in all 3 countries: in the United States (beta=.30; P <.001), South Korea (beta=.21; P <.001), and Finland (beta=.23; P <.001).
The KMO test of sampling adequacy was 0.967 and Bartlett's test for sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The results described in Table S2 in the Supplementary File revealed highly significant ( P < 0.001) model fitness with ( F = 101.057, 9851.888, 59.047, 754.712 and 545.650) intercept, concentration and time.
Overall the association was highly significant (Kruskal Wallis test: P < 0.001).
The interaction effect was found highly significant β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.18, 0.35], t = 6.26, p < .001, which indicated that the relationship between perceived overqualification and deviant behavior was moderated by career stakes (career or survival).