“highly significant”

When compared to normal skin, vascular density in the tumour-adjacent stroma of all KAs was more than twice higher and this was highly significant ( P <0.001; Figure 3 ).

Comparison of composite scores of the Group 1 and Group 2 respondents indicated that there was no statistically significant difference for the scale that is related to health service-seeking behaviors, while highly significant differences were observed for the other three composite scores ( P < 0.001).

Six of the seven anaplastic tumours of this series presented deletions at the short arm of the X-chromosome, and a highly significant association ( P <0.001) was detected between Xp sequence losses and ATC.

Highly significant necrosis was thus observed in the epinephrine-treated group (epinephrine vs methoxamine and epinephrine vs 0.9% NaCl, both at P <0.001).

Numbers of SMNs in these groups were small, but there was a highly significant trend ( P <0.001) in the risk of secondary myeloid leukaemia with a striking increase in the SIR from 2.7 in those treated pre-1970 to 69.9 in the group treated after 1979.

However, they also showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among the 4 participating observers.

According to the ANOVA F test, the HHS in the interval between the first, second, third, and fourth follow-ups was calculated and found to be highly significant (p < 0.001).

This 9.4 year difference in life span is highly significant ( t -test, P ≤0.001).

Statistical comparisons between receptor subgroups and menopausal status, tumor grade, lymphatic invasion, lymph nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy drugs and pathological stage were highly significant (p-values < 0.001).

The difference in knowledge levels about the negative effects of smoking and toxic tobacco substances from cigarettes among students from different departments and colleges was highly significant (P<0.001).

However, the developmental time from parasitism to mummy formation had a highly significant influence on the number of pupae, with shorter time associated with a higher number of pupae (F 1, 90 = 18.41, p < 0.001).

On comparison of study variables according to dyslipidemia versus normal lipid levels, the lipid profile, including HDLc, LDLc, TC, and TG, revealed a highly significant difference (p-value <0.001) whereas many variables were not significantly different.

With regard to completion time, we observed a highly significant (p <0.001) statistical difference between the time needed to complete the SFES scale (about 7 mins) and the time needed to complete the question on cohabitation status (about 10 s) ( Table S3 ).

All three factors had highly significant effects on survival in the univariate analyses ( P <0.001 in all cases).

– The statistical methods were verified, assuming a significant level of P < 0.05 and a highly significant level of P < 0.001.

A highly significant logarithmic relationship was found ( r =0.94; P <0.001), indicating that a 10% increase in apoptosis leads to a 7% decrease in blood flow.

The level effect is found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001), with the estimate of −4.396.

The difference between the two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant association between wild IDH1 and glioma progression (P<0.001), as 96.8% of wild IDH1 showed progression and mutant IDH1 showed a mean of about 30 months survival compared with about 13 months for those with wild IDH1 .

Nine of 10 birds shed virus after onset of lay compared with only two in the three-and-a-half weeks before, and there was a highly significant increase (P<0·001) in the overall number of virus isolations during this period.

The Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient between Johns Hopkins and Tom Baker values was highly significant in a positive direction ( r =0.764, P <0.001), indicating a high degree of similarity in the distress levels of patients within different cancer diagnoses at both institutions.

Results and discussion Medicinal plants diversity and Ethnobotanical knowledge There was a highly significant difference between age of respondents and knowledge of medicinal plants (Wilcoxon's test, p < 0.001).

The markers, which showed highly significant segregation distortion ( P < 0.001) from the expected 1:2:1 (co-dominant) or 3:1 (dominant) ratio, were excluded from map construction.

A multivariable logistic regression using only significant predictors in each domain and the CMS category as the dependent outcome identified the oral parameters of the salivary flow rate and PISA as highly significant parameters of the CMS category ( p < 0.001).

Regression modelling to predict extreme scores in the fatigue domain produced a highly significant solution [ χ 2 (5) = 30.1; p < 0.001] which indicated that the putative high cytokine producing T allele of the IFN-γ +874 T/A SNP was the best predictor of severe fatigue [ p < 0.001; OR: 3.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8–7.2].