All the three preloading fluids, including Ringer’s Lactate used as control, were seen to significantly increase the capillary blood glucose levels intra-operatively ( P < 0.05), but the rise with Dextran-40 was seen to be sustained and highly significant ( P < 0.001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In contrast, the difference in the number of spermatozoa expelled from males across these three treatments was highly significant (one-way ANOVA, F 2,23 = 38.865, p < 0.001).
Differences was considered statistically significant if P < 0.01 and highly significant if P < 0.001.
The mean postoperative refractive SE when implanting a plus power IOLs was −0.3 ± 0.51 D ( P < 0.001) while the mean postoperative refractive SE when implanting a minus power IOLs was +1.21 ± 0.11 D denoting a highly significant tendency toward hyperopia ( P < 0.001).
A similar highly significant trend was found for the prevalence of sex in students who drank more frequently (Pearsons χ 2 = 69.48, df3, p < 0.001; Linear-by-Linear Association χ 2 = 63.68, df1, p < 0.001).
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, paired t test) and the data indicate that the model could be established successfully.
TTP remains highly significant (6.2 months vs 4.3 months; HR 0.57 (95% CI, 0.43–0.77; p > 0.001).
A two-way ANOVA between pregnancy stage and all 16 forebrain areas analysed revealed this effect to be highly significant ( P < 0.001, F (1,195) = 31.3).
Effects for Time, for both tasks, were highly significant, F (1, 14) = 41.1, p < .001 for the EndoBubbles task, and F (1, 14) = 10.3, p < .001 for the VR-Colonoscopy task, confirming that participants became faster on both tasks.
The large decrease in the proportions rather or very annoyed by sound from aircraft was, not surprisingly, highly significant (McNemar test, chi-square 284.031, p < 0.001).
All individual effect estimates remained highly significant (p < 0.001) in both models, and the magnitudes of these estimates did not vary appreciably (differences < 30%) except for the covariate for distance from the terminal, which was approximately 50% smaller for the non-fence line dataset (which consisted of points at somewhat greater distances from the airport).
A statistical comparison of the sRNA/bp in TEs and gene regions showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001).
All data presented was highly significant at P < 0.001 following correction for multiple tests.
ANCOVA (Repeated measures) on adrenaline taking the four levels of observation showed a highly significant ( P = .001) drop in the IAM group.
The differences in total genetic variation partitioned into two levels (among populations and within populations) were tested According to the analysis, there was a higher variation within (80%) and a lower one among populations (19%) All values were highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ).
The interaction between the morality denoted by the adjective and its valence was highly significant, F 1,35 = 12.26, p = 0.001.
F st value was 0.2290, R st value 0.1067 and AMOVA 22.90% ( F st ) and 10.67% ( R st ), all being highly significant (p < 0.001).
In this work we found a highly significant reduction in SOST levels overtime (p-value = 0.001) ( Figure 2C , Table 2 ).
The difference among the age-specific DWs was found to be highly significant (ANOVA F = 17.77, P <0.001).
The Cuzick test ( Cuzick, 1985 ) for trend across the groups 1–3 was highly significant ( P <0.001).
The difference between the cases and controls, for hemolysin production, was highly significant ( P <0.001).
This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that the three-factor model fit the data significantly better than the one-factor model.
The enrichment of AluY is highly significant (p < 0.001) based on simulation.
The highest F ST value was observed between the Dzungarian and the southeastern Gobi ( F ST = 0.0191), the lowest between the Transaltai and the southeastern Gobi ( F ST = 0.0068), and an intermediate between the Dzungarian and the Transaltai Gobi ( F ST = 0.0088; all pairwise F ST values were highly significant at P < 0.001).
The difference in HbA 1c reduction was highly significant ( P < 0.001) between G1 and G2 (0.67% [0.35–0.99]) or G3 (0.91% [0.60–1.21]), but not between G2 and G3 ( Fig. 2 B and Supplementary Table 2 ).