“highly significant”

61 The increase in LV mass was also highly significant for the HIV group (p=0.001). 61 No association with ART class was found, but individual antiretroviral agents were not examined.

The demographic data, regarding HCV, showed a highly significant difference in HCC and cirrhotic groups vs control (P = 0.001), and also between HCC vs cirrhotic group (P = 0.01).

increasingly complex non-linearities of model stage), stopping at the number of knots that gave the best fitting model (based on linear mixed effect model comparisons, as implemented in the lmerTest package).There was a highly significant main effect of ROI ( F = 330.7, p < 0.001) reflecting the fact that overall model fit decreases as one moves from EVC to pVTC to PrC (which could be because of differences in the level of noise in the fMRI data across these ROIs).

The high R 2 and F-values, and the low p-values indicated that the proposed quadratic models for all responses were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Across all treatments, smaller individuals had a higher degree of melanism, and the linear relationship between total dorsal surface area and the log-transformed ratio of black to yellow pigment was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.10, P < 0.001).

In the KORA FF4 cohort, BMI showed strong correlation with WC ( r = 0.865) and moderate correlations with WHR ( r = 0.542) and BFP ( r = 0.501), all highly significant ( p < 0.001), underscoring its association with abdominal fat distribution and overall adiposity (Tables S7 and S8 ).

We observed a strong, highly significant correlation between total‐Tau and Non‐P‐Tau ( rs = 0.8577, P < 0.001), but only weak, though significant, correlation between P‐Tau and Non‐P‐Tau ( rs = −0.21, P = 0.043).

Although the total AE prevalence did not increase with age ( P = 0.35), a highly significant difference in the total CE prevalence was evident between younger and older students ( P < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

The differences in AUCs between the models were highly significant (P < 0.001), even after controlling for multiple comparisons.

Moreover, GC1 demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation with GCall (P < 0.001).

Overall, there was a highly significant effect of bait type on “efficacy” (Chi 2 = 23, df = 2, p < 0.001).

A step forward was taken by testing for association with plasma apolipoprotein levels: after adjustment for age and sex, we identified a highly significant association with apoA1 ( P =0.001) but not with ApoB levels ( P =0.32; Table 2 ).

Overall Pathogen and Treatment Effects Results of the GLM analyses suggest that two locations (Jackson, Yum-Yum) had a highly significant effect on varroa load (Model 1: df = 297, p < 0.001; Table 2 followed by Milan ( p = 0.04).

Analysis of the ranked final mean mortality per tank confirmed that there were no significant differences among tanks, but highly significant differences among all species (GLM, F 2,29 = 25.3, p<0.001) and when analysed using pairwise comparisons each species was different from the other.

Raters’ agreement was highly significant (in all cases, p<.001).

Median strain ratio (SR) values were 5.69 (4.07–14.47) for Type I, median 1.49 (1.26–1.74) for Type II, and median 0.21 (0.13–0.30) for Type III, and there was a highly significant relationship between HC types and SR values ( P < 0.001).

Co-expression of GFP–ROPIP1 together with RFP–HvMAGAP1 led to a highly significant change ( P ≤0.001, χ 2 test) in the distribution of the three categories when compared with control cells ( Fig. 7B ).

In the SAS condition, however, strong and highly significant intra-limb associations were found between TA and RF onsets for both the non-paretic and paretic leg (non-paretic: R 2 = 0.742, p < 0.001; paretic: R 2 = 0.754, p < 0.001).

The two-way interaction between emotion and component was highly significant [overall: F (1, 262) = 202.11, P < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.44; specific: F (1, 262) = 152.32, P < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.37].

5 F) in a highly significant manner ( P < .001, Fig. 5 H). 2.4 Mitochondrial markers of apoptosis The level of pro-apoptotic Bax and the anti-apoptotic Bcl2 markers were measured in the hippocampus 10 days after Aβ 25–35 peptide oligomer i.c.v. injection in mice, by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

7 ), and found that there is a highly significant ( P <<0.001) linear correlation between the estimates obtained under the standard MG94xREV model, and the 2 MSS models.

However, highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were found among genotypes for all traits.

In the PrL cortex, one-way ANOVA found a highly significant group difference ( F (2,15) = 13.32, p < 0.001) and Tukey’s post hoc analysis showed significant differences between the control and anhedonic ( q = 7.25, p < 0.001) as well as between the control and stress-resilient rats ( q = 4.37, p < 0.05).

The results were considered; nonsignificant when the probability of error is more than 5% ( P > 0.05), significant when the probability of error is <5% ( P ≤ 0.05) and highly significant when the probability of error is <0.1% ( P ≤ 0.001).

Results: Sedation score was statistically highly significant between Group A and B ( P < 0.001).