“highly significant”

The finding that services were perceived as “unaffordable” was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and was associated with a large negative coefficient (−2.270762).

Statistical significance was defined as follows: p < 0.05 was considered significant, p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant, and p < 0.0001 was considered most extremely significant.

typus aggregate ( Table 3 ), with the biggest difference shown to be between mean depth at the aggregation sites, 22.2 m, an order of magnitude lower than non-aggregation sites (635.3 m); this difference was highly significant ( t = 19.262, df = 1006.7, p < 0.001).

All tests revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

While all sources of variation exerted a highly significant effect (p < 0.001), the difference among accessions within geographical populations accounted for most of the variation (68.3%), whereas only 6% was explained by the difference among the geographical populations.

Sex differences varied from significant (t=2.056; p<0.05) for the sub-nasal area in Class II Division 2, to highly significant (t=3.772; p<0.001) for the upper lip sulcus in Class II Division 2.

There was a highly significant increase in bone in the mandible (0.40 ± 0.62 mm; P < 0.001), while in the maxilla there was a slight loss of bone, which was highly significant in the apical third (− 0.16 ± 0.77 mm; P = 0.001).

The model revealed a highly significant effect of stimulus modulation depth ( F (1,30) = 333, p < 0.001), but no significant effect of group ( F (1,30) = 0.00, p = 0.99) and no significant interaction effect ( F (1,30) = 0.01, p = 0.92).

Lesion location The Welch ANOVA results reveal highly significant differences in both SE ( F = 5.02, p < 0.001) and SP ( F = 3.37, p < 0.001) across IOCs, IOSs, radiography, and visual methods, indicating that the diagnostic performance of these tools varies significantly depending on the lesion type and diagnostic metrics.

Morphometric results The measuring of the percentage % number of ovarian follicles of the neonatal rats (PND 4); showed a highly significant decrease in the average percentage of the primordial and early primary in the GA3-treated group in comparison with other study groups ( P <0.001), then showed a significant increase again ( P <0.05) after Se combined treatment in comparison with control group ( Fig. 2E ).

Statistical analysis confirmed that differences in sensitivity rates between fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin were highly significant (p < 0.001).

10 Baseline EQ-5D was a highly significant predictor of CV mortality (P<0.001).

Association ASD severity and tuber count The association between the ADOS total severity score and total tuber count was highly significant ( β = 0.46, p < 0.001), and about 20% of the variance in the ADOS total severity score could be explained by the total number of cortical tubers.

A higher Student's t -value corresponds to a lower p -value, indicating a highly significant coefficient. 67 According to Table 7 , the effects of the three parameters on the adsorption yield of BB41 were found to be significant ( P < 0.001) for both adsorbents. 63,64 It is followed, to a lesser extent, by second-order interaction effects.

Predictor for doctors prescribing medicinal cannabis While age emerged as a weak yet statistically significant predictor of prescription attitude (β = 0.22, p < 0.05), the strongest predictor was attitude towards the clinical use of medicinal cannabis, which demonstrated a robust and highly significant positive relationship with prescription attitude (β = 0.71, p < 0.001) (Table 4 ).

Supplementary Table 1 provides the changes in CBF, brain surface AC-ECoG power, scalp AC-EEG power and mean arterial pressure from baseline during middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), which were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Fast networks significantly differed from slow networks in all categories ( Fig 4c ), with the differences being highly significant for the case of mixed-selective neurons (more common in fast networks, p < 0.001) and silent neurons (more common in slow networks, p < 0.001).

melanogaster genotype was a highly significant predictor of ovariole number (Levene’s test, F 13, 266 = 2.7702, p = 0.001).

The prevalence of MetS in cases (53%) was statistically very highly significant when compared to the controls (17%) ( P < 0.001).

When we analyzed our data after including as few as 6 randomly selected cluster size measurements per cell, a Kruskal–Wallis test gave highly significant p-values for three cultures (p = 0.001, n = 174 sites (6 *29 cells)) and five cultures (p = 0.005, n = 294 sites (6 *49 cells)).

GSEM analysis revealed a significant positive effect of the homozygous wt (A/A) genotype on PTX-3 serum levels (standardized path coefficient of β = 0.259, p = 0.0300) and a highly significant effect of PTX-3 serum levels on disease severity (β = 0.468, (p < 0.0010; Figure 5B ).

The difference was highly significant among all the three groups ( P < 0.001 among all groups).

The log-rank test confirmed highly significant differences between survival curves ( p < 0.001), with events occurring in 1,461 of 1,617 OCS patients compared to 0 of 254 OCV patients.

The difference between sexes was highly significant (GAMM: edf = 8.99, R 2 adj = 0.51, estimate male = 0.247 ± 0.012 (SE), P = 0.001).

In the Met + EZY group, the observed upregulation of PPAR-γ gene expression at both three months and six months remained highly significant after FDR correction (adjusted p < 0.001).