“highly significant”

Throughout the exposure period, the decreases in 5-HT levels were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

prausnitzii) (mean changes: +8.94 log CFU and + 5.00 log CFU, respectively; p < 0.001), resulting in a highly significant between‐group difference ( p < 0.001).

6B ), which was also highly significant (p < 0.001).

Interaction terms were retained if statistically significant ( p < 0.05), with priority given to biological plausibility when highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A chi-square test was performed for the living environment, showing a highly significant association between vaccination status and living environment (chi2 = 98.6, p < 0.001), suggesting that these findings are significant.

Analysis of the variance revealed that these non-linear models were highly significant statistically (for each parameter P < 0.001).

In both strata, within-group paired analyses confirmed highly significant improvements (all p < 0.001), indicating that functional recovery and implant survivorship are consistent irrespective of age at the time of surgery.

For every reference gene, the difference was highly significant (p < 0.001).

As for AURKA, the differences in protein expression levels of BUB1B in the different histological subtypes of TGCTs were highly significant ( P <0.001).

Neutrality tests The overall F ST for whole data set was 0.008 (95% CI: 0.003 - 0.016) and was highly significant (P < 0.001).

In the present study, both groups showed a highly significant (p<0.001) difference in mean dental plaque scores for both maxillary and mandibular arches throughout the study period.

Using ANOVA by treating dyskinesia scores as factors, dyskinesia scores were found to be highly significant for SL ( p < 0.001) and SA ( p < 0.001).

Analysis of total extractable inositol phosphates in the ileal digesta by two-way ANOVA showed no significant effect of TiO 2 on the recovery of mixed inositol phosphates ( F 1 , 43 = 0.71, p = 0.4), whereas dietary treatment by way of inclusion of phytase was highly significant ( F 3 , 43 = 93.51, p < 0.001).

We found highly significant differences ( p <0.001) in severity of pancreatitis, Ranson score, and mortality between the AKI and non-AKI groups: in the AKI group there were 8 mild and 44 severe panceatitis cases, the average Ranson score was 4.98±1.59, and mortality was 36.5%, whereas in the non- AKI group there were 190 mild and 63 severe panceatitis cases, the average Ranson score was 2.75±1.58, and mortality was 5.8%.

8.6%), with a highly significant difference ( p < 10 −3 ) ( Table 2 ).

The combined test performed on the p -values extracted for the six kinematic parameters revealed a highly significant effect of Gravity for the visual block (Fisher combination: K = 26.38; p = 0.001).

Remarkably a highly significant difference in slopes (P < 0.001) supports the suggestion that in this model uranium is a good substitute for selenium.

A three-way rmANOVA for the eye movements from Experiment 1 demonstrated that matching eye movement and stimulus parameters—inducing retinal speeds below ±30 dva/s—led to a statistically highly significant increase in visual sensitivity (d’ = 3.05 ± 0.47) compared to trials with higher retinal velocities (d’ = 1.68 ± 0.40; F (1,8) = 264.24, p < 0.001; Figure 2d ).

Finally, the strong and highly significant results of the Mantel test within the C4 genetic cluster ( r = 0.785, P = 0.001) demonstrate the pattern of IBD also exists at a smaller scale for N. obscura ( Table 3 ).

Paired t-tests demonstrated that reductions in TC and LDL-C were highly significant (TC: t = 12.47, p < 0.001; LDL-C: t = 10.29, p < 0.001), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals of 31.2-43.3 mg/dL and 19.8-28.6 mg/dL, respectively.

The highly significant metabolites ( p < 0.001) in BGEL as compared to BGE were kaempferol, aucubin, eucarvone, isoartocarpesin, tectorigenin, dihydroxyflavone, diferuloylputrescine, methylflavanone, inuline, benzopyran, and indoleacetic acid ( Figure 7 B).

Table 3 shows that the linear regression analysis revealed a strong predictive model, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.86 and a highly significant p-value (p<0.001).

Statistical significance is reported by the p value of the statistical test procedures and was assessed as significant (*, p < 0.05), strongly significant (**, p < 0.01), or highly significant (***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).

According to the logistic regression, ratio of BUC/ALN was highly significant for different factors including week-SI (odds ratio:−6.535, CI 0.000–0.016, P < 0.001), and medium SI (odds ratio: 9.135, CI 170.182–505386.699, P < 0.001).

Further proteins, that did not show high changes compared to untreated control samples (|log 2 FC| < 0.5), but displayed highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) among both treatments will now be discussed in more detail ( Table 7 ).