“highly significant”

UVA alone, RF alone, and the combination of RF and consecutive UVA irradiation show a highly significant trend toward reduced cell viability (all P < 0.001). β-Coefficients for UVA irradiation, RF concentration, and their interaction term are −29.3% per mW/cm 2 UVA, −605.2% per % RF, and −1206.9% per mW/cm 2 UVA * % RF, respectively.

In addition, MBC response to precipitation reduction showed a highly significant positive correlation with elevation ( p < 0.001, Figure 5 c).

Resting pressure: The mean pressure was 58.1 ± 15.1 mmHg among continent cases, 49.1 ± 15.1 mmHg among minor incontinent cases, and 37.1 ± 12.1 mmHg among major incontinent cases with a highly significant difference between continent and major incontinent groups (P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].

When combining all three experiments, the difference in proportion becomes highly significant ( P < 0.001), with the cerebral regions of interest hosting significant voxels in a larger proportion of participants than the cerebellar regions of interest.

One-way ANOVA showed a highly significant group effect (F(3, 34) = 99.690, p < 0.001), and Tamhane’s T2 post hoc test was applied.

However, the year nested within-group factor did show a highly significant effect (Pseudo-F = 6.13, p = 0.001), indicating that temporal variations explain much of the changes in microbiota ( Supplementary File S9 ).

The addition of chromosomes 1HS (1HS add) and 7H (7H add), in addition to the 5HS-7DS.7DL wheat–barley translocation (5H-7D trans) and the 2DS.2DL-1HS translocation line (2D-1H trans), all showed highly significant increases in FHB resistance compared with Mv9kr1 ( P <0.001 in both experiments for all lines).

It should be noted that the bacterial community of the genus Kosakonia was significantly affected by S-CL activity, and there was a highly significant negative correlation between the two factors ( p < 0.001).

Twenty one highly significant (p < 0.001) and robust marker-trait associations were identified.

Fisher distances were highly significant ( p < 0.001) between the experiments of WS and DS.

Furthermore, the ANOVA showed highly significant differences among the fungal species evaluated (F = 34.77, p < 0.001).

Position error (PE) for periods T1 and T2 The statistical comparison of the performance errors (PE) in the two periods T1 and T2 revealed a highly significant difference (F(1,7) = 95, p < 0.001), reinforcing the fact that fluctuations in finger position were higher during the transition period T1, as can be seen in the grand-average of the finger position (Figure 1E ).

In well-watered conditions, highly significant differences were detected between the genotypes for photosynthesis (A), transpiration (E), and stomatal conductance (gs) ( p < 0.001).

The difference between the groups was highly significant (two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum [Mann-Whitney] test, p < 0.001).

Notably, C i exhibited negative correlations with all measured indicators ( r = −0.740 to −0.229), which are significant for Chla, Chlb, and TChl ( p < 0.05), and highly significant for Tr and SSC ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant correlation between AREG and EREG mRNA expression was observed (Spearman ρ 2 = 0.736, p<0.001 ).

When PTM-mediated direct model was used, the overlaps between the observed DEGs and the expected targets of SNF1 were highly significant (Table 1 , p-value<=0.001), while the number of the overlap was 0 (p-value=1) when other models were used.

The analysis of variance indicated that there are highly significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001) in the year-by-year width of the tree rings of the studied tree species.

The models retained high explanatory power, with pseudo R 2 values of 47.19% for daytime and 43.47% for nighttime, and highly significant likelihood ratio tests ( p < 0.001).

The analyses of both MoCA and QoL-AD scores yielded a highly significant interaction [MoCA: F (1,58) = 57.18, p <0.001, η p 2 = 0.50; QoL-AD: F (1,58) = 17.17, p <0.001, η p 2 = 0.23].

24 , 52 , 56 Results Genetic Connections Compared to Historical Documents The overall correlation between embarkation counts from Africa and mean proportion of identity by descent shared 42 ( ms IBD) between regions of Atlantic Africa and all of the Americas ( Figure 2 A) is highly significant (Spearman’s coefficient permutation; p < 0.001).

For all four genes, in most cases allele frequencies in the feral populations differed significantly (p ≤ 0.025) from the frequencies in the reference flocks, most of the differences being highly significant (p < 0.001).

When two extreme outlier values were excluded from the analysis, the interaction was highly significant [F(1.1, 6.8) = 25.3, p = 0.001].

Variability in EI according to age, activity, educational status, SES, social background, and BMI status also showed highly significant variability (P<0.001).

Genotype differences were highly significant overall ( F (2,48) = 233.9, P < 0.001), confirming poor rotarod performance in 6-mo-old Ube3a mice.