“highly significant”

The highly significant effect on FI in trial 2 ( P < 0.001 for the grower, finisher, and entire 35-day period) was in contrast to the absence of a treatment effect of OxBC in trial 1.

More importantly, the bioassay can detect the variation in scarcely diluted human DNA, collected from 23 donors, and can reliably distinguish between heterozygous (TG genotype) and homozygous (GG genotype) in respect to the control subjects (TT genotype), where the differences are statistically highly significant ( p -value < 0.001).

Effects of salinity and species × salinity interactions were highly significant for ψ s ( P < 0.001, P < 0.05 respectively) and XPP ( P < 0.001).

This negative trend is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

When long-term mortality was assessed at total follow-up of maximum 16 years in the same multivariate Cox regression model, the prognostic impact of IE somehow attenuated, but remained highly significant (HR 1.73, [1.29–2.32], p < 0.001).

There were highly significant phylogenetic signals in both FS 1 ( P = 0.001) and FS 2 ( P = 0.002), implying that both approaches showed statistical dependency due to the species’ phylogenetic relationships.

Even at this lowest dose there was a highly significant delay in the average onset of emesis (P<0.001), with 2 of the 4 ferrets being completely protected.

32 The prognostic index was highly significant in the VG ( P < .001) and with a regression coefficient of 1.04 very close to the optimal value of 1, indicating no obvious bias or overfitting.

Regarding our main analysis, i.e., comparison between CSF-lactate measured either by the blood gas analyzer or the reference method, we calculated a Pearson correlation index of 0.94 (highly significant correlation on a two-sided significance testing ( p < 0.001)) (Fig. 2 ).

This association was statistically highly significant (P value <0.001).

An evaluation was done for PB Treg cells by pooling newly diagnosed, relapsed and patients in remission together as a MM cohort; this pooled cohort did not show statistical significance against MGUS and SMM, while it was highly significant against HVs (P<0.001).

Analysis of tumors revealed highly significant decrease in the expression of NF-κB in VGB3- and GNP–VGB3-treated tumors (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively).

As LAPS score was strongly associated with attitudes across all countries, judged by the highly significant p-values (p<0.001) that in most cases prevailed between LAPS and the attitude/willingness measures in Table 6 , potential correlations between LAPS score and age, gender, living status, possession of pet health insurance and income were tested ( S6 File ).

However, in a post hoc analysis, we calculated our graph theory measures of interest from both 10 and 5 min of healthy control hdEEG data and found large and highly significant correlations between recording lengths for all measures (all r ≥ 0.800, all P < 0.001; see ‘Data Repository’), giving us confidence in the robustness of graph theory metrics in 5-min hdEEG recordings.

Based on Wald testing, the allelic effect on heading date was highly significant ( P <0.001) but there was no significant interaction between allele and vernalization treatment ( P =0.192).

Furthermore, sperm viability and organelle functionality showed a decrease after thawing, displaying highly significant differences between 0 and 2 hours post-thawing: YOPRO-1-/PI-, t(32) = 11.47, p<0.001; MT+, t(32) = 6.26, p<0.001; and PNA-, t(32) = 11.18, p<0.001 ( Table 2 ).

The chi-square association between the total FSI for all levels and FSC was highly significant (p < 0.001).

ultimum alone showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) necrotic areas of tuber slices, no or very little necrotic areas were recorded when slices were treated with S1Bt23 (Fig. 5 B).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001).

The Chi-square tests for these categories were highly significant (p<0.001).

The 50% excess over the expected number was highly significant (95% CI 1.3-1.7, P<0.001).

Results show a highly significant decrease in ΔT 1 (p<0.001) after bedrest in all IVDs, and in all areas of the IVDs.

Moore and Gordon ( 2015 ) evaluated the reliability of the abridged version of ART and confirmed its validity as a predictor of eye movements registered during reading for comprehension (N=789, all correlations between mean gaze duration and the 100-item ART score highly significant at p < .001), see also Choi et al.

Statistical analysis confirmed this anticipated size difference between sexes to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A non-parametric correlation analysis (details not presented) among the outcome measures revealed a highly significant correlation between the angle combination K+A-aRoM and the PGA score in the entire cohort (p < 0.001).