“highly significant”

The results were considered significant at * p < 0.05, very significant at ** p < 0.01, or highly significant at *** p < 0.001.

The results indicated a highly significant association, with χ 2 (1) = 70.125, p < .001, and a pseudo R 2 Nagelkerke of .70, signifying substantial explanatory power.

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in signal intensity between HEAO and HLBO were observed for 3-pentanone and its dimer, ethyl 2-methylbutanoate, limonene, α-pinene, ethyl acetate and its dimer, ethyl 2-methylpropanoate, benzaldehyde, and methyl 2-methylbutanoate.

There was highly significant heterogeneity among the included studies (I 2 = 100%; Q = 2658; P value < 0.001).

Further, there was a highly significant increase in CFE when the NRK cells were treated with the HCT116/BAG-1 siRNA CM (p≤0.001, Figure 4C ) which again was blocked by pre-incubation with the blocking antibody.

The statistical model for the dependent variables (IB, MOR, MOE, TS, WA, TC) was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all variables and the explanatory power of the model was high, as shown by partial η 2 -values higher than 0.83 for all investigated panel properties. 3.1.

On the other hand, there was a highly significant improvement in PVF in the BCP group (p < 0.001), an effect that was significant compared to the PLA group (p = 0.012) or the unaffected limb of the same group (p < 0.001).

All three link functions revealed highly significant common scale parameters (for each life stage P < 0.001), thus adequately describing the variability in development times observed among individuals in each stage.

The regression coefficient calculated for this association was highly significant by Student's t-test (P < 0.001).

Previously, we had found that for an OR with a typical expression frequency (~0.1%) and an effect size of ~2-fold, statistically 12 OE sections taken from four different animals were sufficient to find a highly significant difference (p < 0.001; two-tailed paired t test).

Pairwise comparisons between groups with differing glycemic control using Dunn’s test revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences for all categories save between the diabetic and poorly-controlled groups, which were not significant.

District-wide variations in spatial distributions of depression and suicidal ideation were highly significant (χ 2 =203.601 , p <0.001 and χ 2 =92.230 , p <0.001 respectively).

These differences were highly significant (P < 0.001) in each instance.

Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05, with highly significant results reported at p < 0.001.

One-way analysis of variance is performed with Dunn’s Test following ranked–based ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks) and Student–Newman–Keuls method, taking p < 0.05 as significant, p < 0.01 as highly significant and p < 0.001 as extremely significant and represented by an asterisk in the figures.

A 2 × 2 × 4 ANOVA test yielded a highly significant effect of levels ( F = 75.84, DF = 3/69, p < 0.001) indicating that the level of percent PPI increased as the level of prepulse increased.

The correlation between the simulated temperature and the real value is highly significant ( R = 0.96, P < 0.001).

In the range of 30–70%, there was a highly significant difference ( p -value ≤ 0.001) in the mean intensity between the agglutination blood reaction at 213.4 ± 14.4 and nonagglutination at 52.5 ± 8.4.

Notably, there was a highly significant negative correlation between MCE and clinical MMSE score for the composite population ( r = − 0.483, P < 0.001), indicating a strong link between connectome expression and cognitive function (Fig.

The semi-quantitative analysis of the immunohistochemical expression levels showed a highly significant increase at 7 days, 14 days and 21 days, respectively ( P <0.001) ( Table 2 ).

The chi-squared test for heterogeneity was highly significant (I 2 = 78.1%, P < 0.001).

The difference between the two countries in mean gene number was highly significant ( t test, p = 0.001; Table 2 ).

Comparison between the baseline and the ninth month was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.001), suggesting that the mouth rinse has better results when used for a longer duration of time.

On day 28, serum ferritin level dropped to 115.76 ± 15.30 μg/L in IV iron therapy group in comparison to 43.61 ± 8.88 μg/L in oral iron supplementation group which is highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 2 ].

The two-way ANOVA indicated highly significant ( p < 0.001) effects of both salinity and the salinity × hormones interaction on shoot and root FW and DW.