“highly significant”

A paired Wilcoxon Rank test demonstrated that this difference is highly significant (W = 40.5, p < 0.001). 5.2.1.

When relating extraction times to particle size distribution, a highly significant positive association was found with Q 100μm (p < 0.001).

The difference in acquisition time between both sequences was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The overall regression model is highly significant at the P < 0.001 level.

Compared to untreated cells, BC cells treated with CI-994 or MS-275 show a highly significant (p < 0.001) increase of NIS transcript, whereas AR-42 and chidamide drug treatment shows either low or non-significant increase of NIS transcript, respectively ( Figure 2 A).

As expected, highly significant differences were found between the 2 groups in the AL and SER ( p < 0.001 for AL, p < 0.001 for SER; Table 1 ). 3.2.

6 B) as well as highly significant elevation in levels of GSH (P < 0.001; Fig. 6 A).

In this work we found a highly significant reduction in SOST levels overtime (p-value = 0.001) ( Figure 2C , Table 2 ).

Despite intergroup differences in MED not being significant, intragroup differences in psoriatic untreated patients resulted highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 2 B).

In the HFmEF subgroup, furosemide showed a higher increase in urine output of 3,914 mL compared to torsemide, with a highly significant p-value (p < 0.001).

We found a highly significant spatial correlation ( r = .91, p < .001) between the uncorrected voxel‐wise FCD‐neuroticism correlation map with and without controlling for trait anxiety and harm avoidance (Figure S3 ), indicating that removing the variance from trait anxiety and harm avoidance may not obviously bias our results.

In trained state, on the other hand, there were highly significant general differences between the vitamin and placebo group ( p < 0.001) both for the genes showing the largest SIT-induced increases (IL-1β and IL-6, Figure 1 a) and those showing more moderate effects ( Figure 1 b).

In Figure 1 we show that, at both test concentrations, treatment with rice NPN resulted in a statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction in TNF-α secretion compared to the untreated control.

Both CD features, VI and VFA, were statistically highly significant regardless of Bonferroni correction ( p < 0.001).

The significance level was: significant— p ≤ 0.05; very significant— p ≤ 0.01; and highly significant— p ≤ 0.001 using the normal distribution of the variables.

There were highly significant relationships ( Figure 4 a,b) between TW and milling yields ( R 2 = 0.75, p < 0.001) when results of all four varieties were combined.

The highly significant p-value <0.001 suggests there is a less than 0.1% probability that this strong positive relationship occurred by chance.

Results were considered nonsignificant (∗) if P < 0.05, significant (∗∗) if P < 0.01, and highly significant (∗∗∗) if P < 0.001.

The difference among the age-specific DWs was found to be highly significant (ANOVA F = 17.77, P <0.001).

The log-rank test indicates a highly significant result, with p < 0.001.

The Cuzick test ( Cuzick, 1985 ) for trend across the groups 1–3 was highly significant ( P <0.001).

The difference between the cases and controls, for hemolysin production, was highly significant ( P <0.001).

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that the three-factor model fit the data significantly better than the one-factor model.

mansoni failed to significantly alter the levels of circulating IFN-γ or IL-4; treatment of infected mice with low and high CUR doses resulted in a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in circulating IL-4 levels ( Figure 6 ). 2.3.3.

The model presents a moderately high explanatory power with 64% of the variation explained by the selected factors, among which aging, FAR, and commercial density are highly significant at the 99.9% confidence level ( p < 0.001).