“highly significant”

saline, P > 0.1) and a non-significant time effect ( P > 0.1) as a consequence of the reversal of CPP, but a highly significant compartment × time interaction ( P < 0.001, F = 14.3).

For all conventional methods (M0-M4), we observed a highly significant ( P < 0.001 ) main effect of yield estimation methods on the magnitude of standardized relative error ( Table 4 ).

Conversely, TCTP microinjection significantly reduced emergence (6.71%, n = 581) compared to the control microinjected with water (70.06%, n = 220) with a highly significant P ‐value ( P < 0.001).

It is also important to note that RIs with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were practically absent in the variants (about 0.1% of the total quantity of RIs).

This enhancement effect was in line with the same effect previously described for the soluble polyphenol fraction, as also confirmed by the highly significant ( p < 0.001) linear correlations observed between the soluble and bioaccessible fractions (r = 0.919).

Furthermore, the results on PTH gene expression among RNA seq (rlog normalized) and qPCR data showed a highly significant correlation (rho = 0.81; p < 0.001). 3.4.

This approach revealed a highly significant correlation between AF intake and total urinary AF ( p < 0.001, r = 0.65).

A paired t-test confirmed a highly significant difference between Ho and He ( p < 0.001).

Two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test showed the median difference in preintervention and postintervention serum folate concentrations to be highly significant ( P < .001).

In the present study, 76.19% relief was found in pain which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001) [ Table 1 ].

The results obtained revealed that Rasayana compound was found to decrease cough (83%), fever (93%), dyspnea (71.3%), hemoptysis (87%) and increase body weight (7.7%) with statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).

Statistically highly significant ( P <0.001) decrease in systolic BP was observed in VP, PK and VK Prakriti individuals of DME group after walking (isotonic exercise).

The reliability of RNA-seq data was validated by qRT-PCR detection of 10 randomly selected up- and down-CRGs using gene-specific primers ( Supplementary Table S1 ), showing a highly significant correlation (R 2 = 0.96, p < 0.001) between the results of RNA-seq and qRT-PCR ( Figure 2 C,D).

Osteocalcin displayed highly significant negative correlations with HbA1c (r = − 0.309, P < 0.001), CRP ( r = − 0.327, P < 0.001), FBG ( r = − 0.191, P = 0.031), IL-6 ( r = − 0.227, P = 0.010), and TNF-α ( r = − 0.184, P = 0.037).

Results remained highly significant when only the five randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were considered (RR = 1.76, CI 1.65–1.88; p = 0.001).

There was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in erythrograms (e.g., RBCs, packed cell volume (PCV), hemoglobin (Hb), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV)).

griseus (sp22) showed highly significant nonlinear relationships with soil total nitrogen (TN) and soil water content (W) ( p < 0.001), while no significant relationships were found with other soil factors including AHN and C/N ( p > 0.05) ( Figure 9 a–d and Figure A1 ).

2 b). Length-weight relations (LWRs) varied significantly across the populations (ANCOVA: F 3, 293 = 1430, p < 0.001) and within each population, LWR models were highly significant (R 2 ≥ 0.96, p < 0.001; Table 2 ).

ANOVA analysis indicated a highly significant difference between the signal intensities of the different groups (p<0.001).

The addition of 100 and 500 ppm taurine had a highly significant ( p = 0.001) effect on the plasma antioxidant potential in chicks.

Their results revealed a highly significant positive correlation between invasively measured systolic ( r = 0.763, p < 0.001) and diastolic ( r = 0.618, p < 0.001) central blood pressures and non-invasive BP readings.

The PERMANOVA results ( Table 2 ) revealed highly significant differences in skull parameters among the different developmental periods (R 2 = 95.54%, p < 0.001).

At 12 months, this rose to 68% and 32% in Group I and Group II, respectively, which was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in both cases.

From this study, we observed that the cognitive learning outcome measured with the pretest and posttest scores, students performed better in Group B (39.53%) than Group A (18.43%), and the difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001***) [ Table 1 and and Figure 1 ].

Differences were considered as non-significant (ns) when p > 0.05, significant (*) when p < 0.05, very significant (**) when p < 0.01, and highly significant (***) when p < 0.001.