“highly significant”

4.5.3 Spatial clustering of the vulnerability of grid cells across the protected area Spatial autocorrelation analysis (Global Moran's I) of grid-cell vulnerability index values showed highly significant (z-score >19.62, p < 0.001) positive spatial correlations (I = 0.68) across the HFPA, meaning that neighboring grid cells exhibit similar vulnerability index values more often than expected by chance.

The mean SOFA score was highest in intubated patients (11.96 ± 4.61) and lowest in those without ventilation (4.86 ± 4.01), showing a highly significant difference (H = 30.848, p < 0.001).

An alternative analysis using Poisson regression showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) linear mortality decline over the full period 1998–2007.

3.5 Genetic differentiation and Bayesian clustering of phenotype sorted samples Moderately large and highly significant genetic differentiation was observed between the sympatric spotty and plain wrasse sampled in Galicia, as revealed by the 82 SNPs (pairwise F ST = 0.025, p < .001; Table 3 ).

In the AdheSE group (ASE), the difference was very highly significant ( P = 0.001) between the control (ASE-I) and the contamination sub-group (ASE-II).

We found highly significant isolation by distance ( p < .001), with 30% of variation explained by geographic distance ( R 2 = 0.30).

The mean female transmission rate was 83.3 per cent (95% CI = 71.2–93.1%), and mean male transmission was considerably lower at 46.9 per cent (95% CI = 35–59%), a difference that was highly significant (generalized linear model (GLM) with quasi-binomial error structure, t 79 = 3.975, n female = 39, n male = 48, p < 0.001).

When cotton was used as a substrate, ML and L showed a highly significant increase in attractiveness towards female house flies ( Fig. 4a , ANOVA , F 4, 45 = 6.97, P < 0.001).

Estimates of GCA and SCA variance for grain yield under acid and optimal soil conditions The effect of environment, genotype, and line and tester GCA variance were highly significant ( P ≤ .001) for grain yield and significant ( P ≤ .01) for replications and SCA (Table 5 ).

The highly significant p value (p < 0.001) further supports the conclusion that surgical treatment results in substantially faster resolution of trigger thumb than conservative management.

We found a highly significant and strongly positive correlation between maternal hCG serum levels and the PUQE-24 score (r = 0.70; p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 2 A.

Results were defined as significant with P -values < .05 and highly significant with P -values < .001.

This difference in interest in the ACP supporting tool is highly significant (Chi-square test, DF = 1, N = 311, X 2 = 12.72, p < 0.001).

The results from ANOVA showed that the effect of genotype factor on pigment contents was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).

Statistical analysis confirmed a highly significant effect of time on functional outcome ( p < 0.001).

No significant difference ( p = 0.872) was observed between patients (65.18 ± 16.69) and parents (66.01 ± 19.98) (Additional file 3 : Table S3); but the difference between patients and age-matched controls (54.35 ± 21.37) was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with increased methylation in the patients (Fig. 2 ).

The difference was highly significant, t (94) = 4.77, p < .001, d = .96, indicating greater proportional RT priming for R2 INC/SAME than R3 SAME .

The result shows that there is a highly significant difference (value of p < 0.001) between the tolerant and the susceptible genotypes confirming the outcomes observed with electrophoresis.

Although the overall number of significant tests between clusters at each follow-up remained stable at each follow-up, the number of highly significant pairwise statistical test (i.e., p < 0.001) decreased from 60.0 to 36.7%.

Modules that displayed a highly significant degree of overlap (p < 0.001) were considered to be ‘consensus’ modules.

There was a highly significant positive correlation between task cycle and performance (ρ = 0.924, p < 0.001) ( S2 Dataset ).

Univariate analysis in Table 4 examining sociodemographic associations with personality cluster classifications revealed highly significant age-related stratification (χ 2 =28.111, p<0.001), with Cluster B demonstrating marked predominance among younger adults aged 18-30 years, comprising 78 participants (59.54%) compared to nine participants (6.87%) in Cluster A.

Cochran’s Q test confirmed a highly significant overall difference in the proportion of correct shade matches among the three methods (Q = 94.62, df = 2, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

A highly significant overall effect was found on the mPANAS negative affect scale (Wald = 10.334, df = 1, P =0.001) and the Emotional Abuse subscale of ETISR-SF (Wald = 8.57, df = 1, P = 0.003).

Overall, non-neoplastic dermatoses exhibited a lower median MVD compared to the CTCL group with a highly significant difference in-between (20 versus 37, p<0.001).