“highly significant”

The between-group difference in post−intervention cycle duration was highly significant (P<0.001), and the between-group difference in cycle reduction was 6.79 days (95% CI: 0.14-1.02, P = 0.008) ( Table 5 ).

Moreover, ANOVA results ( Table 8 ) confirmed a highly significant relationship (P < 0.001) between the soil EC and the selected predictors.

Accordingly, a highly significant difference was observed between the amount of energy imported and exported by birds during the study period (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001).

Similarly, hip T-scores also showed a highly significant reduction in the OP group ( t = − 24.025, p < 0.001).

Results After the intervention, athletes’ occupational burnout decreased significantly.Scores for emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced professional efficacy dropped from 4.23 ± 1.25, 3.87 ± 1.12, 4.01 ± 1.18 to 3.12 ± 1.08, 2.95 ± 0.98, 3.05 ± 1.02, respectively.Paired-sample t-tests revealed highly significant differences for all subscales (t = 5.31–5.81, all p < 0.001).

A 4 (Character Style) × 2 (Participant Gender) mixed-design repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of character style on perceived realism, F (3, 84) = 130.72, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.78.

The difference in operating time for patients who underwent UNE and BNE was statistically highly significant (71 min vs. 97 min, p ≤ 0.001).

Most of items showed positive, and moderate correlation, while other items showed weak correlation, with the overall performance ranging from r = > 0.22–0.65 with highly significant p value ( p < 0.001).

sPG identified functional patterns in 29.3% of previously unclear vertigo/dizziness cases, leading to a highly significant increase in the diagnosis of functional dizziness ( p < 0.001).

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of antioxidant type ( P < 0.001 ), confirming that antioxidant efficacy was preserved irrespective of the adhesive system used.

The interaction term between negative sentiment and Horizon Worlds was highly significant ( β = 47.4 , p < 0.001), indicating that negativity in this specific context is exceptionally viral, a finding consistent with platform governance literature on “outrage economies” [ 34 ].

The overall p values for intragroup comparisons were highly significant for both PMMA ( p = 0.001) and SSC ( p = 0.003) groups, indicating that time had a significant effect on gingival health in both groups, though the improvement was more pronounced in the PMMA group.

This difference was also statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In block 2 (with resilience, adjusted R2 = 0.51), the inclusion of resilience increased the explained variance in R2 by approximately 13%, suggesting a moderate incremental contribution of the factor according to Cohan’s conventions, and the change in the F value between the two models was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in antifungal activity between all EOs tested.

Notably, statistical analysis revealed that the OCC + Laser group exhibited a significant difference ( P < 0.05) compared with the OCC alone group, and a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) compared with the Ce6 + Laser group.

Association between admission departments and pathological subtypes Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant association between clinical departments and pathological subtypes (χ2 =370.6, P < 0.001).

This trend was highly significant (τ = 0.73, p < 0.001), accompanied by a moderate but significant expansion in range (τ = 0.35, p = 0.005; Fig. 2 ).

In contrast, Macará exhibited substantially greater variability, with weekly precipitation ranging from 0.0 to 308.4 mm and highly significant interannual differences (F = 60.210; p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

The results showed that the Red (600–700 nm) and NIR (750–900 nm) bands provided the strongest discriminatory power among species, with highly significant F-values (p < 0.001).

The expression difference peaked at 24 h, with IS1219 showing a highly significant upregulation ( P < 0.001) relative to RTx430.

Notably, the difference in ammonium N content between these two microenvironments was highly significant in the N3 treatment ( P < 0.001).

The optimal anchor scaffold depended on the reporter genes, particularly the anchor orientation had a dominant and highly significant effect on the surface display activity (ANOVA, p < 0.001, Fig. 3 B).

Finally, the visual model confirmed that the degradation mode had a highly significant impact on both metrics ( p < 0.001), with reading ability also serving as a significant predictor for peak activation ( p < 0.001) and cluster size ( p = 0.008).

Driving statements of therapeutic misconception Coefficients of correlation between component statements for the “Therapeutic misconception” factor and the factor score ranged from 0.437 to 0.703, being highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all statements (see Table 5 ).