“highly significant”

They also found a highly significant over-representation of gastric cancer in the parents of the index cases (p < 0.001) [ 27 ].

The results of a chi -square test show that the likelihood ratio statistics are highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting that the explanatory power of the regression model is strong.

The Omnibus test results are highly significant ( P < 0.001).

MANCOVA revealed a highly significant group difference ( F 4/61 = 34.03; p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.69).

This is clear in the highly significant ( p < 0.001 using a chi-squared test) difference in satisfaction between the diagnosed and non-diagnosed participants of normal BMI, with the diagnosed being much less satisfied, independent of their current BMI state.

This increase in the bread volume and height/width ratio was higher than the one induced by the commercial α-amylase, which attained 0.49 and 0.1, respectively (highly significant difference with F = 33.85 ( p < 0.001) for the specific volume and F = 74.72 ( p < 0.001) for the height/width ratio).

This frequency dependent effect on response amplitude was highly significant for all four types of eye movement responses (P < 0.001).

Almost all sonographic parameters determined during IUS, including bowel wall thickness, vascularization parameters, fibro-fatty proliferation and other parameters, showed a highly significant decrease (P<0.001 in all groups) at different sites.

Accordingly, the patients’ evaluation of the information material had a highly significant correlation with patients’ decisions ( p < 0.001).

On the other hand, the increase of α exponent is large and highly significant (Cohen’s d = 1.07; p < 0.001) in PD participants and evolves in the same way that H exponent (Cohen’s d = 1.05; p < 0.001).

None of the genes showed significant interaction with BMI (results not presented); CDKAL1 *BMI and CAPN10 *BMI interactions were significant only at 10 per cent despite BMI showing highly significant association with the phenotype ( P < 0.001).

The orientation when moving from one pool site to the next showed a highly significant directionality (expected bearing = 0°, mean bearing = 347.3°, 95% CI = 325°–9.7°, Rayleigh test: P < 0.001, N = 34).

The difference between those willing compared to those not willing to be treated was highly significant ( χ 2 = 318.82, P < 0.001). 3.3.

The model provides a highly significant fit as compared to a null model (null −2LL = 11.66, final −2LL = 26.92, χ 2 = 30.52, p < 0.001; Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.73; AIC = 37.32).

Furthermore, our analysis revealed a highly significant lower OTU richness in the PAG compared to the RS and the SO (both pairwise comparisons P < 0.001), whereas OTU richness in the RS and SO were not significantly different from each other (Table 2 ).

The decrease in TSPYL5 protein expression was found to be highly significant between RWPE-1 and DU145 ( P = 0.001) while moderate difference was observed between RWPE-1 and LNCaP, ( P = 0.04) cells.

This difference was highly significant ( χ 2 = 96.522, p < 0.001).

Administration of 3-NP alone shows motor abnormalities, decreased locomotor counts, loss of memory in EPM, decreased motor coordination in beam walking test, decreased hanging latency on hanging wire test and even 3-NP alone treatment resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction in body weight.

There was a significant effect of cue condition, F (2, 64) = 8.323, p = .001, η p 2 = .206, and a linear contrast respecting the predicted order of cues (ISI, NI, FSI) was highly significant, F (2, 64) = 8.323, p = .001, η p 2 = .206 (see Figure 1 ).

While SF-1 expression in MUC-1 (100 ± 0.0%) and NCI-H295R (78.3± 12.3%) was comparable (p=n.s.), we detected a highly significant SF-1 overexpression in the pediatric ACC tumor model SJ-ACC3 (348.2± 27.4%, p < 0.001 vs.

The highest levels of maternal cortisol were measured before the first and the lowest after the first SSC session and the difference was highly significant (p<0.001).

Although variation in KP levels between non-pregnant and pre-clinical abortion groups was marginally significant (P=0.044), it was found to be highly significant between non-pregnant and clinically pregnant females (P<0.001).

In contrast, when the model considered all available PTX3 readouts which, for patients who developed GvHD, included the measurement at onset, it revealed that PTX3 had indeed a highly significant diagnostic relevance ( p < 0.001), suggesting that the protein level rose at time of GvHD occurrence.

Using logistic regression with seclusion availability as the dependent variable, controlling for PICU availability, MAPAT times remained highly significant ( P < 0·001).

The differences between the three study groups concerning their major reason for an acute referral were highly significant (χ 2 = 72.4; p < 0.001).