“highly significant”

Our study results were consistence with above said study, the neck circumference was found highly significant with difference of (p < 0.001).

Consistent with the pathophysiological features of PA, patients demonstrated characteristic biochemical abnormalities, including significantly increased PAC and ARR, decreased DRC, and lower serum potassium levels compared to the EH group, and these differences remained highly significant ( P < 0.001) in both males and females upon stratified analysis (Table 1 ).

With these two correlated samples, the change of attitude in pre and post assessment was highly significant (P<0.001).

Associations were considered highly significant at a threshold of P < 0.001.

Bartlett's test was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure value of 0.77 supported the factorability of the matrix.

The monthly difference in breast cancer cases showed a highly significant negative linear correlation with monthly new COVID-19 cases (r=0.79, p<0.001) ( Figure 2 ).

field temperature were highly significant (P<0.001) and with average R 2 above 0.95) and actual warming was within ±5% of the prescribed value [35] .

The mean fluorescence intensity for targeting liposome was about 1.41, 2.74, and 5.72-fold stronger than that for DOX/CEL lipo, DOX lipo, and DOX solu respectively after 4 h incubation, showing a highly significant difference (P<0.001).

An evaluation was done for PB Treg cells by pooling newly diagnosed, relapsed and patients in remission together as a MM cohort; this pooled cohort did not show statistical significance against MGUS and SMM, while it was highly significant against HVs (P<0.001).

Notably, most correlations were highly significant, including correlations with M2 macrophages (CD163, VSIG4, and MS4A4A, cor: 0.47–0.51, P < 0.001) and Tregs (CCR8, TGFB1, STAT5B, and FOXP3, cor: 0.37–0.48, P < 0.001).

Incorporating genotype as a moderator in the meta-regression confirmed that these differences—both in starting efficacy and in decay rates—are highly significant ( p < 0.001).

When including precuneal Aβ slope and the interaction term (Aβ precuneus *∆Aβ precuneus ) in the model, the predictive power of baseline amyloid burden in this ROI became highly significant (β = −0.29, t = −3.7, P < .001), and both precuneus slope (β = −9.71, t = −2.2, P = .030) and the interaction term (β = 8.71, t = 2.6, P = .011) were marginally predictive of changes in MMSE.

The change was insignificant in CPS REGION (+4.7%, p=0.373), while it was highly significant in CTR REGION (+23%, p<0.001) ( table 1 ).

This result was highly significant (Z=5.98; p <0.001), suggesting that the observed agreement exceeded that expected by chance.

Results There was a highly significant increase in serum soluble endoglin in high-risk women compared with controls at week 13 ( P < 0.001).

complex) were highly significant (Chi-square test, p < 0.001 for both tests).

Statistical analysis again indicated that these differences in growth were highly significant across all time points (p<0.001).

While this confirms a minor confoundment, the effect of MA on PU only decreased slightly and remained highly significant ( β = 0.205, p < 0.001).

The APL, FNPL, and surface DSC at 0 mm remained highly significant correlates with correction time in every T stage, overall stage, and thoracic volume quartile subgroup ( p values < 0.001) except the stage IIIA subgroup, in which only the APL and FNPL (but not the surface DSC) were significant correlates.

We found highly significant (P<0.001) increase in the prevalence of ECG abnormalities in males as compare to females.

Using student t -test, improvements at discharge, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment showed a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.001).

The difference between the two time points is highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney, Fig. 2b , Supplementary Fig.

Highly significant relationships between DOM and microbial compositions were observed by CCorA (Pillai’s trace statistic = 1.704, P < 0.001) with high canonical correlations found on the first two axes (0.963 for canonical axis 1, 0.719 for canonical axis 2).

In Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, the difference in means turns out to be highly significant (z = 45.558, p<0.001), showing the overweight vignette to be rated consistently more negatively.

Highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) were observed for reaction to both pathogens in both years.