“highly significant”

Specifically, for the cue-induced craving task, the baseline β -band PEC model achieved highly significant predictions of therapeutic improvement for both the L-DLPFC-iTBS ( r = 0.856, P < 0.001) and PCu-iTBS ( r = 0.675, P = 0.008) groups.

The ANOVA with Age group (3), as between SS-factor, Current congruency (2), Preceding congruency (2), and Priming (2), as within-SS factors yielded a highly significant interaction between the effects of Current congruency, Preceding congruency and Priming, F (2, 62) = 418.63, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.87.

The model was highly significant (χ 2 (29) = 69.934, p < 0.001) with good fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.800), explaining 19.4% (Nagelkerke R2) of variance in social phobia and accurately classifying 68.4% of cases.

Abnormal VPT showed strong and highly significant associations with all five complications, including IHD (OR: 4.24, 95% CI: 2.64–6.83, p<0.001), CeVD (OR: 6.30, 95% CI: 2.97–13.36, p<0.001), DFU (OR: 19.65, 95% CI: 4.62–83.55, p<0.001), DRP (OR: 12.56, 95% CI: 6.96–22.68, p<0.001), and DN (OR: 3.78, 95% CI: 2.53–5.65, p<0.001).

A similar fit performed only for the highly significant categories (red solid line in Fig. 1 ) yields a = −0.285 ± 0.072 ( p < 0.001) and b = −0.0127 ± 0.0081 ( p = 0.13).

Pearson’s product-moment correlations revealed a highly significant positive correlation between miRNA fold changes obtained by qRT-PCR and by microarray (r = 0.97, df = 7), n = 9, p < 0.001), thus providing statistical confirmation for the validity of the microarray results (Fig. 2b ).

The ANOVA for NIHSS scores (Table 5 ) revealed highly significant main effects of Time (MS = 1852, F(3, 48) = 676.9, ηp2 = 0.96, p < 0.001) and Group (MS = 2175, F(1, 50) = 169.2, ηp2 = 0.77, p < 0.001), as well as a significant Time × Group interaction (MS = 424, F(3, 48) = 155.2, ηp2 = 0.76, p < 0.001).

The regression coefficient was highly significant (value = 0.1378, p < 0.001), showing a clear linear relationship between fruit size and body size ( Fig. 11 ).

Most notably, the TTH demonstrated a highly significant divergence between groups ( p < 0.001), with the S group demonstrating the shortest median TTH of 94 s (IQR: 86–98) compared to 256 s (IQR: 245–295) in the C group and 120 s (IQR: 78–131) in the T group, as presented in Table 10 and Figure 6 . 4.

Total numeracy score showed highly significant effects across all three subscales of EAGL-short (all p < 0.001), consistently demonstrating the strongest associations.

The analysis revealed a significant main effect of Sertraline treatment ( F (1, 24) = 54.219, p < 0.001) and a highly significant Interaction between Exercise and Sertraline ( F (2, 24) = 21.436, p < 0.001).

The median time spent on the general instructions page was also 3.0 sec, and the relationship between time spent on the instructions and the time spent on the prompt page was highly significant ( p <0.001), making time spent on the instructions page a good variable to control for potential differences that may exist in participants who spend more or less time reading text.

The results revealed that the cooking method had the most significant impact on PAH formation, with a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) across all PAHs.

Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the model was found to be statistically highly significant (F: 5.64; P value < 0.001) with R value of 0.4 [ Table 3 ] implying that the independent variables included in the model explained 16% of the variability in the quality of reporting items in PRISMA- extension of checklist for abstracts [ Table 3 ].

Highly significant differences in fine root traits among different soil layers ( p < 0.001) were found, with the CV for fine roots in each layer ranging from 15% to 58.17% and exceeding 10%, indicating substantial variation in fine root distribution across soil layers.

There were highly significant ( P < 0.001, F 2,46 = 87.68 pancreas, 75.64 liver, 47.20 gizzard, F 2,47 = 47.78 proventriculus, F 2,42 = 8.82 empty gall bladder) differences in organ weights (Table 1 ) between treatment groups in experiment section “Sex and diet effect” with the AL group having, on average, a significantly large

Females reported higher levels of SI (M = 0.19, SD = 0.39) than males (M = 0.09, SD = 0.27), and this difference was highly significant ( p <.001).

One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD revealed highly significant differences among cooked groups for all parameters ( p < 0.001).

The correlation between the measurements of SFCT performed by two independent observers was highly significant ( r = 0.96; p < 0.001).

The analysis revealed highly significant main effects of both Eccentricity— F (4, 52) = 136.56, p < .001, partial η p 2 = 0.91 , and Emotion— F (5, 65) = 44.1, p < .001, partial η p 2 = 0.77 , but there was no main effect of Task— F (1, 13) = .74, p = .404, partial η p 2 = 0.05 .

presented a greater reduction in ADHD-RS-IV parent-rated inattention scores (−7.74 ± 1.94) than did the placebo group (−5.34 ± 1.85), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

This creates a “shunting inhibition” effect: the leaky membrane creates a low-resistance path that prevents the accumulation of charge necessary for threshold depolarization. Statistical analysis ( Figure ) confirms that while peak current magnitude shows high variance ( p = 0.110), the increase in hysteresis energy is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

16 ± 2.82, P < 0.001 highly significant [HS]) with more number of complications (5.85 ± 1.65 vs. 3.7 ± 1.31, P < 0.001 HS).

Log–log regression further revealed a highly significant allometric exponent (β = 0.47, p < 0.001), indicating sub-isometric scaling, whereby proportional investment in stone mass declined with increasing fruit size.

The resistance rate of cephalexin showed a highly significant increasing trend from 2013 to 2021 ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 2 B).