“highly significant”

All correlations were highly significant at p< .001.

Similarly, MMSE scores declined across the diagnostic spectrum, with all between-group comparisons remaining highly significant ( p < 0.001).

After PVI (1.13 ± 0.39 procedure per patient), ATA burden decreased from 2.68 (0.09–15.02)% at baseline to 0 (0–0)% during the first year and 0 (0–0)% during the second 2-year (highly significant reduction in ATA burden of 100 (100–100)%, p < 0.001).

Germination was affected by kairomones and DAMPs, as reflected by a highly significant kairomone*DAMP*hour interaction (Fig. 1 ; X 2 = 19.85, 3 d.f., p < 0.001), as well as a significant kairomone*hour interaction (X 2 = 34.89, 3 d.f., p < 0.00) and a significant DAMP*hour interaction (X 2 = 50.72, 3 d.f., p < 0.001).

To compare the accuracy of factors identified by regression analysis, we included the three factors with highly significant results ( p < 0.001; age, life satisfaction, and cognitive level) and the six factors with significant results ( p < 0.05; age, final educational level, residential area, regular exercise, life satisfaction, and cognitive level) in the comparison.

The maximum reduction of 32 mg/L (93.30%) was observed after 20 days that showed highly significant treatment ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 2(c) ).

In the groups of half tablets (split by knife or cutter) a strong positive ( r ≥ 0.947), highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlation was found between weight and drug content, indicating a good tablet content uniformity.

Age-adjusted odds ratios for CCS>0 among American compared to Japanese men were highly significant before (6.0, 95% CI 2.9, 12.2, p<0.001) and after (6.4, 95% CI 3.0, 13.3, p<0.001) adjusting for Lp-PLA2 levels.

Binary regression analysis obtained a highly significant relationship ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.81, Fig. 7h ).

However, the difference in noise levels between the center of the clinic and the chairside (with either of suction with air rotor handpiece, suction with micro-motor handpiece and suction only) was very highly significant for all the maximum readings ( P = 0.001).

The SNPs that did not match the following criteria were removed before performing population diversity analyses: (i) SNPs with call rates less than 90%, (ii) SNPs with minor allele frequencies less than 5%, (iii) SNPs with more than 1% missing genotypes, and (iv) SNPs displaying highly significant deviations ( P -value < 10 −3 ) from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ( Amaral, Pavão & Gama, 2020 ).

In reference to the history of abusive behavior exhibited by husbands during pregnancy, violent behavior towards family members, abusive behavior towards his relatives or friends, escalation of violence, substance abuse, general antisocial behavior, criminality and mental health issues showed a highly significant association with the occurrence of IPV ( P < 0.001) as presented in Table 3 .

Behavioral data on the task This analysis revealed a highly significant main effect of direction (F1,91) = 85.12; P < 0.001; pη 2 = 0.48); participants were slower to respond to looming stimuli than receding stimuli (mean loom = 468.14 [s.e. = 14.16]; mean recede = 419.54 [s.e. = 10.25]).

The results indicated a significant difference between the VAS scores of the groups, with a highly significant P-value of < 0.001.

A highly significant difference among treatment groups ( p < 0.001) was observed (Fig. 4 ).

According to the Linear Mixed-Effects Model (Table 3 ), Cap Material had a highly significant main effect (χ 2 (1) = 60.94, p < 0.001), indicating superior retention of PEEK caps compared with nylon caps.

urediniospore germination on agar disks The smooth terms (temperature and duration on agar disks, which correlates with exposure to moisture required for germination) in the model were highly significant based on approximate measures of significance (F 18,18 = 85.2, P<0.001).

The data are highly significant, as indicated by the F -value ( F = 4842.92, P < 0.001).

Consequently, the value of amylase after treatment had a highly significant difference as compare its level before treatment(P< 0.001).

Methanolic extracts of fruit and bark showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) increase in total WBC, DLC, and platelets and significant ( P < 0.01) increase in RBC and Hb% when compared with cyclophosphamide group (Group II) which was dose dependent.

A one-way ANOVA confirmed a highly significant difference among the three strategies ( P < 0.001), with whole-body kVCT being 2–3 times faster than either MVCT approach.

Thus, for multivariable analysis, T class was divided dichotomously in T0-2 vs T3-4, providing a highly significant prognostic stratification (Table 1 ; HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17–0.44, p < 0.001).

ANOSIM test revealed a highly significant difference in community structure between the three study sites ( R = 0.9158, p < 0.001).

1 a), which was supported by a highly significant clone effect in the PERMANOVA (pseudo-F = 74.00, R 2 = 0.32, P = 0.001).

Additionally, a highly significant main effect of object type was found F (7, 70) = 27.14, p <0.001, observed 1−β = 1.00, indicating that some of the objects could be named faster than the others regardless of prime color.