“highly significant”

The Spearman-Rho test demonstrated that correlation between all methods used for the determination of free hemoglobin was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Malaria parasitaemia prevalence showed highly significant seasonal variation ( P < 0.001), with a wet season September peak of 70% in non-pregnant women and a single dry season nadir in May of 18%.

Estimated age according to percentage methylation across the 46 loci had a highly significant relationship with actual age ( p < 0.001), explaining 98% of the variation in chronological age using the test data set and predictions from the Elastic Net model ( R 2 = 0.98; Figure 3a ). 3.4.

All clusters identified in this model were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

In this subsample, convergence measure second half shows large and highly significant correlations with (a) of r = 0.839, p = 0.001, with (b) of r = 0.843, p = 0.001 and with (c) of r = 0.763, p = 0.004.

This suggests that there may be some sensitivity to the temporal relation that would require further testing, but kind of sound is likely to play a major role. The interaction between sound type used during imprinting exposure and test condition (electronic supplementary material, Extended figure S4) was highly significant ( F 3,271 = 8.049, p < 0.001; figure 2 ), as was the main effect of sound type ( F 1,271 = 29.473, p < 0.001), but not that of temporal structure.

When further assessing each value of FEAR index, GAA and DA ANOVA detected highly significant differences when assessing for full-thickness LT tears (Type III) ( p <.001).

Testosterone showed highly significant effect modification by fetal sex for both overall and spontaneous PTB (both interaction p<0.001), with an IQR increase in testosterone conferring lower risk of PTB among male fetuses and higher risk among female fetuses which did not differ between study visits.

Statistical analysis showed that the difference in fluorescence was highly significant ( P < 0.001) when induced cells were compared to noninduced cells or the negative control, while no significance was found when comparing the fluorescence of the negative control with that of uninduced cells.

However, the diabetic group demonstrated a highly significant association (p < 0.001), with PDI Class III being the most prevalent classification.

The age effect was highly significant, with an adjusted OR of 1.09 per year ( p < 0.001).

A post hoc statistical analysis showed that the age (as a covariate) of the population included in the study has no effect ( P = 0.749) in the highly significant clinical improvement ( P < 0.001) obtained with MV130 when compared with placebo.

7 A , incubation of WT BMDMs with high glucose for 7 days resulted in a trend to increased CD86 mRNA transcripts, and incubation of WT BMDMs with CML-HSA AGE for 48 h resulted in a highly significant increase in CD86 mRNA transcripts ( P < 0.001).

All pairwise comparisons yielded highly significant differences (p < 0.001), confirming meaningful distinctions in classification performance.

Highly significant univariate variables ( P value <0.001) were included in the multivariate model.

Group B had a substantially lower mean gestational age at delivery (37.1 ± 1.4 weeks) than Group A (38.2 ± 1.3 weeks), with a highly significant difference (t = 5.40, p < 0.001).

Therefore, the genotype effect was highly significant (genotype factor; F (2,73) = 8.291, P = 0.001, genotype Х paradigm; F (4,73) = 4.117, P = 0.005), indicating that the interaction between MT and iTBS in modulating motor map plasticity is highly dependent on BDNF genotype.

The differences between all normalization procedures were highly significant (p<0.001).

This showed that the average disease risk difference between trimester 1 and 2 was highly significant ( P <0.001 in all methods ( Fig. 4 )) confirming that PIH has vastly different effects on developing fetuses and the subsequent general health of children depending on timing of exposure.

These data clearly show a relatively small but consistent elevation in basal [Ca 2+ ] i that was highly significant ( n = 10; P < 0.001) at all potentiation time points.

The Type III Tests revealed several significant effects: The intercept was highly significant (Wald χ2 = 8,972,964.143, p < 0.001) Duration in seconds showed a strong effect (Wald χ2 = 27,881.261, p < 0.001).

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ( ∗ ), P < 0.01 as highly significant ( ∗∗ ), and P < 0.001 ( ∗∗∗ ) as extremely significant.

Highly significant genotype by temperature interactions were found (two-way ANOVA, F 4,71 = 12, P <0.001).

The interaction between the time of the evaluation and the therapeutic modality was highly significant ( t 183 = −36.974, p < 0.001, d = 0.91).

The Kaplan-Meier analyses for DMFS as a function of the seven-gene signature showed highly significant differences between the high- and low-risk groups ( Figure 3B , P < 0.001 in the training set; P = 0.039 in the validation set).