“highly significant”

An ANOVA comparing the impact of these parameters with biological variation in both species revealed that although all effects are highly significant (Table S1, P < 0.001), the sensitivity parameters explain only a minor component of the total variation in oROM in both species (Table S1, effect size: sums of squares; Fig. 8 ).

The inter-group difference was tested through anosim analysis, and the results indicated that the difference between the groups was highly significant (R = 0.7215, p = 0.0010), implying that the beta diversity of the gut microbiome in diabetic mice was significantly improved by TFs intervention, consistent with the results of alpha diversity analysis. 3.4.

The KMO measure of sampling adequacy proved to be extremely good (KMO = 0.92; Hutcheson and Sofroniou, 1999 ), and Bartlett test of sphericity proved to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the quantitative achene variables among the species were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Bootstrapping ( n = 10,000) confirmed that the observed overlap was highly significant ( p < 0.001; Supplementary Figure 7 ) and not an artifact of the presence of shared eGenes within these pathways ( Supplementary Figure 8 ).

Both number of damaged grain and grain weight loss were highly significant ( P < 0.001) among genotypes.

When challenging immunosuppressed, leukopenic mice intranasally with conidia of the metRΔ mutant to induce invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, a highly significant (p<0.001) reduction in the virulence capacity of this strain was observed ( Fig. 7A ) with more than 80% of the cohort surviving the infection.

All those differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Thus, the following simple multiple-linear regression model without interaction effects was calculated: (1) Mean Total System Time for Severely Injured Patients = 335.88 − 0.71 Medical Specialists − 3.34 Medical Assistants − 9.57 Rotation Physicians − 0.17 General Nurses − 2.98 Surgical Assistants − 8.88 Surgical Nurses − 34.61 Radiology Assistants Please note that most of the independent staff category variables had a highly significant ( p -value < 0.001) or high significant ( p -value < 0.01) impact on the dependent variable mean total system time for severely injured patients, while only the independent variable number of general nurses had no significant impact ( p -value = 0.12) as shown in Table 5 and in Figure 4 , the Pareto chart of the standardized effects.

For the color, identity, and location questions, the only independent variable that had predictive power was semantic relatedness (Figure 5 A), which was highly significant in all cases ( p < 0.001).

Quality of life Between and within group differences were highly significant on all domains of the SF-36 ( P < 0.001) with better improvement in the yoga group than the control group on 15 th day and 90 th day.

There were highly significant statistical differences between +ve JAK2 vs -ve JAK2 and +ve FVL vs -ve FVL (p<0.001) (Figure 1 ).

This difference in mean age of people doing and not doing SRPs was statistically highly significant (Z = 7.06, P <0.001).

The results indicate that the model is highly significant (c 2 (4, n = 1486) = 124.25, p < .001).

One-way ANOSIM also revealed a highly significant effect of sampling site (Global test R = 0.797, P = 0.001) based on fish abundance data, represented a significant difference among the four group of those sites.

The difference in the types of SLT used was statistically highly significant between males and females (X2 = 338.3; p < 0.001; Table 2 ). 3.3 Comparison of clinical parameters across the study groups There was a highly significant difference in probing pocket depth (PPD; t = 9.69; p < 0.001), gingival recession (GR; t = 16.16; p < 0.001), and clinical attachment loss (CAL; t = 13.73; p < 0.001) between the SLT users and NTB users ( Table 3 ). 3.4 Effect of tobacco placement on periodontal health The placement of tobacco at various sites within the oral cavity considerably influenced periodontal status ( p < 0.001 for all measurements; Table 4 ).

Although the mRNA level of ALAS1 in liver was less in +/− than WT this was statistically only just significant ( p 0.049) whereas the difference in brain was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Fig. 5 D).

Highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) were observed among the genotypes for AUDPC across all the Nakabango trials (Table 1 ).

The Gender parameter in the SDV model was found to be non-significant, despite being highly significant (p≤.001) in the three other models.

Mean Corpuscular Volume showed a highly significant peak LOD score of 6.8 on chromosome 7 at 79 Mb and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Content had a peak LOD score of 8.2 on chromosome 7 at 86 Mb (corrected p values < 0.001, Fig. 3C, 3D ).

A robust stress response was validated through highly significant c-Fos reactivity in the PVN compared to control (198.9 ± 14.6 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9, p < 0.001; Figure 1 B), which correlated with FPO ( Figure 1 C).

Moreover, a highly significant correlation was found between angle values detected by OCT and histology (Spearman’s ρ ≥ 0.837, p < 0.001; Kendall’s τ ≥ 0.768, p < 0.001; ICC ≥ 0.86, p ≤ 0.01).

Highly significant differences were observed between baseline and after stages for both congruent (air: Z = −4.675, p < 0.001; heliox: Z = −2.985, p = 0.003; trimix: Z = −3.650, p < 0.001) and incongruent trials (air: Z = −4.200, p < 0.001; heliox: Z = −3.299, p < 0.001; trimix: Z = −3.154, p = 0.002).

Table 4 below presents the detailed reasons for not being on HRT among those non-HRT users. There was a highly significant difference between mean knowledge scores and level of education ( p < 0.001).

The analysis revealed a positive and highly significant association between cumulative dose and sIgG4 levels ( P < .001), indicating that higher IgG4 levels are linked to greater tolerance of egg protein.