“highly significant”

The ANOVA showed a highly significant and strong effect of time [ F (3.85, 161.7) = 155.9, p < 0.001, η g 2 = 0.554].

There was a highly significant increase in knowledge and skills from T0 to T1 in both groups for all items (all p < 0.001).

Yield results showed that all three main effects (hybrids, stand densities, and environments) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and that the interactions hybrid × stand density and hybrid × environment were also statistically significant for yield ( p < 0.05; Table 4 ).

The linear regression model was also highly significant, and presented a high value of coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.93, F = 124.08, p = 0.001).

As such, there was a highly significant effect among sites within exposure (F 4, 30 = 10.1, p<0.001) but no significant difference in overall density of colonies of Acropora spp. between exposures (F 1, 30 = 0.8, p>0.10).

The model predicted 32% of the variance and was highly significant (R 2 = 0.32, P <0.001).

All clinical stability tests—Anterior Drawer, Lachman and Pivot Shift—showed a highly significant reduction in anterior laxity post‐operatively ( p < 0.001), indicating successful restoration of the joint's mechanical integrity [ 29 ].

The difference was highly significant ( p = 0.001).

As seen in Table 4 , the Corrected Model was highly significant (F(7, 312) = 19.58, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.305), indicating that the model as a whole effectively explains a significant proportion of the variance in the dependent variable.

Results Changes in (ABC-M), (ABC-D), (ABC-BL), (ABC-B), and (ABC-O) levels showed statistically highly significant differences between T1 and T2 for both bone allografts ( p < 0.001).

Effect on lipid profile Analysis of lipids showed that in Vamana group there was highly significant reduction in total cholesterol and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) (p < 0.001), while significant reduction was seen in ratio of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and total cholesterol (p < 0.05).

Group II exhibited a marked and highly significant decrease in immobility duration (*** p < 0.001), suggesting potent antidepressant‐like activity.

The model without the interaction was highly significant (LMM III: χ 2 = 122.079, df = 1, p < 0.001, R 2 m/c = 0.51/0.92) (Table S10 ).

Hearing improvement after surgery was found to be statistically highly significant with P<0.001.

The present study showed a statistically highly significant knowledge and attitude difference between Group A and Group B ( P<0.001).

The results indicate that significant differences were found across all four variables (p < 0.01), with the following specific findings: Interior spatial design satisfaction: The differences among groups were highly significant (F = 437.234, p < 0.001).

Consequently, the alleles in seven SNP loci showed significant differences ( P < 0.05), and highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) were shown in the four SNP loci of which the three SNP loci were breed-specific between the two working groups given in Table 3 .

This correlation to infants’ serology remained highly significant (p < 0.001) for all HPV types at the 6-month FU (p < 0.001): HPV6 (r = 0.266), HPV11 (r = 0.344), HPV16 (r = 0.321), HPV18 (r = 0.220) and HPV45 (r = 0.259).

The effect of the cesium term was highly significant ( p < 0.001, F-test).

Non-KPC strains (NDM/VIM/OXA-48; n = 48) showed lower resistance (<50%) to several agents and minimal resistance to tigecycline and CAZ-AVI (0–1.0%); resistance differences between KPC and non-KPC groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

When comparing the results obtained before and after the splint therapy, a highly significant reduction in pain was observed in the lateral pterygoid area, tendon of temporalis, and posterior attachment after the splint therapy ( p < 0.001).

Specifically, TNFSF4, TNFSF14, and IDO2 exhibited moderate significance (p < 0.01), while most others, including CD86, PDCD1, CTLA4, and TIGIT, showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001) ( Figure 8A ).

A repeated-measures ANOVA on vRTs revealed an highly significant difference among stimulated hemispheres [ F (1, 103) = 11.740; p < 0.001] with a right-lateralized hemispheric preference.

This improvement is highly significant (WRST: z = − 9.180, p < 0.001).

vaginatum ( Table 2 ), and species' effects were highly significant on an area, mass, or N basis (all P < 0.001, Table S1 ).