“highly significant”

Interestingly, a difference with respect to the HC group was already evident in the MS patients with EDSS = 0 (p = 0.049) and became highly significant starting from the group of MS patients with EDSS 1−2 (p<0.001).

Interestingly, highly significant correlations were found between NOX2 mRNA and serum ferritin (r s = 0.782, P < 0.001) as well as plasma haeme (r s = 0.869, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1 G, H).

Log-rank test confirmed a highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.001) demonstrating clear separation of survival trajectories.

The group effect was highly significant, F (2, 219) = 16.84, p < 0.001, BF 10 > 1000 (i.e., strong Bayesian evidence for H 1 ).

The significance level was generally set at p<0.05 (***p<0.001, highly significant; **p = 0.001 – 0.01, very significant; *p = 0.01 – 0.05, significant; >0.05 not significant).

offline version of the HGSHS was highly significant, but only in a low to moderate range [ r (100) = 0.44, p < 0.001, see Figure 2E ].

Plant Height (m) The interaction effect of cultivar and location on mean grapevine plant height was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

It reduced significantly to the range of 1–15 g with mean being 9.79 ± 9.40 g after treatment ( P = 0.001, highly significant).

Both doses of the plant extract fractions (200 and 400 mg/kg) showed dose‐dependent anxiolytic and antidepressant‐like effects in mice, with the 400 mg/kg dose found to have highly significant ( p < 0.001) effects.

Again, the discriminatory ability of the majority of the nutritional parameters was highly significant based on the evaluation of these objective parameters ( P < 0.001).

The 100 mg/kg dose showed highly significant antinociceptive activity (p < 0.001) in the late phase of the formalin test while the 200mg/kg dose showed no significant antinociceptive activity.

A correlational analysis of the three measures of satisfaction revealed highly significant positive relationships between satisfaction with the exam itself and rapport (r = .75, p < .001).

As wear rates increased, there was a highly significant trend towards a disproportionate increase in serum Cr concentrations compared with the whole blood Cr concentration (Spearman Rank correlation = -0.646, p < 0.001).

The RBANS Picture Naming scores remained highly significant (p < 0.001), while the RBANS Semantic Fluency scores only approached significance (p = 0.057).

Generally, P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), P ≤ 0.01 was considered highly significant (**) and P ≤ 0.001 was considered very highly significant (***) (Chen et al , 2016 ).

The a posteriori pair-wise test among levels of the factor Habitat also showed highly significant differences (P<0.001) between all combinations for habitat in all three estuaries.

The difference between the two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Depth was a highly significant factor associated to the density of jigs in all periods (p<0.001; except in Year 1 when it was marginally non-significant).

In comparison to the controls, the prevalence of submicroscopic malaria infection was highly significant in the cases; 24 (27.6%) vs six (7.0%); P < 0.001.

The trend test is highly significant (Z = −26.20, P < 0.001), indicating the miss rate has generally been increasing in the last 20 years.

We found no reliable differences for type of contrast, since 60% of the tests revealed p > 0.05, but highly significant differences for time bin, F (3, 78) = 64, p < 0.001.

The model indicates that factor B is highly significant ( P < 0.001), B2 is significant ( P < 0.01), and factor A is also significant ( P < 0.05).

On the other hand, differences ranged 15.1–15.6 W (4.3–3.6%) for the four different stroke rates, where a longer duration of the recovery phase for a given drive phase was associated with highly significant differences of ΔP REF−C2 ( P < 0.001).

A highly significant difference was also observed when all 3 doses were compared to each other ( P < .001).

The difference between urban and rural areas was highly significant [48% (213/444) vs. 61% (268/440)] ( p value < 0.001 ).