“highly significant”

There was a highly significant improvement in angina 6 months following intervention in normal LVEF group ( p value < 0.001).

For women, the interactions between age and parental status are highly significant for all health outcomes ( p < 0.001).

Worsening was highly significant when compared to basal values (time sequence ARDS vs. basal value, BV; all p < 0.001 for each parameter respectively, in both lavaged groups), but comparable between the lavaged groups.

The pairwise comparisons of groups with ANOVAs supported these findings ( Table 3 ) and revealed highly significant differences between 4xA and all other groups ( p < 0.001) among all subsets of epiloci.

Among the n-6 PUFA, statistically significant differences ( P <0.01) were observed for linoleic fatty acid and ∑n-6 PUFA, and highly significant differences ( P <0.001) were observed for γ -linolenic (C18:3 n-6) and arachidonic fatty acids.

There was a highly significant, moderate and negative correlation between mind wandering and Attentional Focus ( r = −0.38, p < 0.001).

We found that deep location was a highly significant risk factor, as such patients were 1.919 times more likely to experience subsequent metastasis (95% CI: 1.323–2.783, P = .001).

The 3-way interaction between “group” (i.e., strength of inversion sensitivity in LDT task) x presentation orientation x length remained highly significant and even stronger (t = 6.12, p < .001).

Student’s t -test indicated differences in mutation accumulation between allelic variants of sexual accessions as compared with facultative or obligate apomictics for less than half of the genes ( P < 0.05), whereas highly significant differences were observed between the mutation accumulation of VASL alleles as compared with any other gene tested within sexual accessions ( P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant lowering of IOP in the first postoperative week, after 1 month, and after 1 year ( P =0.001).

While the percentage of single participants was not significantly different between cases and controls, a highly significant difference ( P < . 001) was found when diagnostic groups were considered: single were 92.7% of schizophrenic patients, 78.4% of personality disorders, and 79.8% of other diagnoses.

Whereas both blood group O and B patients possess circulating seric anti‐A, it appears and it is statistically highly significant ( P < 0·001) that O group patients are underrepresented (49·4 % vs. 57·6%), whereas B group patients are, on the contrary, overrepresented (50·6% vs. 42·4%), meaning that anti‐A from O is more protective than anti‐A from B.

Bartlet’s test of sphericity was highly significant at p < 0.001, indicating that the data were appropriate for PCA.

Comparison between months for both variables confirmed highly significant differences (pairwise comparisons – Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment: all P <0.001).

Highly significant (at P < 0.001) Pearson’s correlation coefficients between IR, DS, and COI across four environments showed positive correlations ( Supplementary Table S6 and Figure 3B ).

Statistical significance in pairwise comparisons of progression to CIN3+ vs regression to <CIN1 was found with EPB41L3 alone ( P = .02), while for the full S5 classifier, the difference was highly significant ( P = .001).

The differences were noted highly significant ( P < 0.001) for RCI in water depth, nutrients and species and were noted significant ( P < 0.01) in the interaction among water depth, nutrients, species and their interaction (Table 1 ).

In contrast to this prediction, ANCOVA (α = 0.05) revealed a highly significant decrease in DSD of neurons from female, compared to male mice (F = 14.838, DF = 1, p < 0.001) in A1, A2, V1, V2 and TeA.

The relationship between genetic load and I c became non-significant ( χ 2 = 3.2, p = 0.07), while the negative relationship between flowering start and competitive index remained highly significant ( χ 2 = 12.5, p < 0.001).

Only five pairs of loci out of a total of 2145 were in highly significant linkage disequilibrium ( p < 0.001).

No significant difference was detected among environments because highly significant correlations ( P < 0.001) were detected among all four field trials ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

In an overall analysis, a highly significant correlation of VASp with movement restriction (MR) ( p -value ≤ 0.001), the presence of joint effusion ( p -value ≤ 0.001), and the diagnosis of RA ( p -value ≤ 0.001) were observed.

The scores were in the range of 0.81 to 1.00, which counted as an almost perfect agreement for each theme [ 33 ] with a highly significant P value (95% CI 0.57-1.0; P <.001), which means the agreement is significantly different from what would be achieved by chance.

There is a much less striking pattern for barriers with men reporting slightly more barriers both in addiction and in recovery and with no gender difference in the reduction in recovery barriers in the time in between. The final analysis attempted to predict the total number of recovery assets in recovery using the following factors as independent variables: age, gender, length of recovery, age of first drug use, age of last drug use, recovery strengths in active addiction, recovery barriers in active addiction and recovery barriers in recovery The final model was highly significant (F = 28.58, p < 0.001), predicting 31.8% of the variance of recovery strengths for individuals in recovery, with only age of first use as a non-significant predictor in the final model (see Table 7 ).

Differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA).