“highly significant”

One-way ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of the material on dye penetration (p < 0.001).

At an initial 1 μM concentration, the pure CR showed 94.6% cell viability, whereas the CR-MC depicted highly significant ( p < 0.001) cell viability (60.86%).

Gender distribution showed no significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.6243), while prognostic status showed highly significant differences between the two groups ( p < 0.001), directly validating the prognostic prediction capability of the risk score model.

Population structure Overall F ST value was highly significant ( F ST = 0.04; 95% Confidence Interval C.I . = 0.017 0.039; P <0.001) and pair-wise F ST revealed significant values for 107 out of 120 comparisons, after Bonferroni correction ( Table 4 ).

When combining the SARS-CoV variant groups, clinical signs were significantly lower in PBS controls compared to the SAB-185-treatment group on D2-12 ( Figure 4 B) and highly significant (p < 0.001) on D4-12 ( Figures 4 B and 4C).

Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed highly significant reductions in MADRS total scores compared with baseline at all follow-ups (all adjusted p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S1 ).

The difference between the two groups was highly significant (p<0.001, Student’s test, two-tailed, with Microsoft Excel) in terms of the evolution of the sequences, meaning that recent Guangxi CRF08_BC strains were more evolutionarily different from each other, suggesting perhaps that these strains undergo adaption that allows them to infect people in this locality.

This number of simulations indicates a PRCC value of above 0.24 or below -0.24 is considered to be highly significant with a p value <0.001 [108] .

After adjusting for baseline GAD-7 scores, marital status, and residence using ANCOVA, the group difference remained highly significant, F (1, 146) = 42.8, p < .001, partial η 2 = 0.226, with adjusted mean difference of 4.4 points (95% CI 3.2, 5.6) and adjusted means of 6.4 ( SE = 0.4) for the VR group versus 10.8 ( SE = 0.4) for the control group.

Our results show that for serial intervals of less than 2 days the observed effect of proximity (sharing a bay with someone else who was ill) is highly significant (p<0.001) and for serial intervals up to 2.5 days remained significant at the 5% level.

The LWR analysis yielded a coefficient of determination (r2) with an average value of 0.9553, indicating highly significant relationships between length and weight for all species studied ( P < 0.001).

The categorical analysis of soluble protein was highly significant in stress types ( p = 0.001), study types ( p = 0.001), and maize varieties ( p = 0.02).

There was highly significant increase in serum Dickkopf-1 levels in postmenopausal females with abnormal T score versus controls ( P < 0.001).

The global tests (Table 3 ) reveal strong associations amongst the class II loci/regions, and, more particularly, amongst DRB , DQA1 , DQB1 and DPB1 , which appear to form a tight linkage group, where each locus/region is in highly significant GLD ( P < 0.001) with the others.

Our results showed a highly significant expression of DMP1 (4.86‐fold; p < 0.001), NRF1 (1.66‐fold; p < 0.02) and RUNX2 (1.5‐fold; p < 0.05) in HSV‐1‐infected hPDLSCs compared to uninfected hPDLCs cultured in osteogenic media (Figure 4B ).

A highly significant correlation was observed among various carotenoids in the feed ( p < 0.001).

Compared to heterozygotes with α 0 -thalassemia deletion variants, no differences were found in the hematological phenotype of Corfu δ 0 β + heterozygotes, except for the highly significant differences in HbF ( p < 0.001) and the lower levels in HbA2 and RDW ( Figure 2 ). 4.

Highly significant differences were observed for calcium (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 42.8, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.368, and phosphorus (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 53.6, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.422, with post-hoc comparisons indicating significant differences between all groups.

These correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001) and higher than those reported for the U.S. sample, which ranged from 0.76 to 0.87.

p < 0.05 was accepted as level of significance; ∗∗∗ very highly significant p < 0.001, ∗∗ highly significant p < 0.01; ∗ significant p < 0.05; NS not significant for p > 0.05.

Correlation between ELM, IS/OS, PE Scores and BCVA Correlation between ELM score (central 1 mm) and BCVA including all eyes was moderate yet highly significant at baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, and 7 years ( r = −0.512, r = −0.569, r = −0.648, r = −0.558, r = −0.478, r = −0.478, r = −0.560; p < 0.001).

This association remained highly significant but was less evident when restricting these analyses to only include patients with detectable pretreatment ccfHPV DNA (adjusted HR, 13.4; 95% CI, 4.9–36.9; p < .001) (Table S10 and Figure S4) .

For both parameters, we could confirm a statistically highly significant correlation between the PLR and CRP/fibrinogen (p-value of <0.001; for PLR>150 and CRP: Pearsońs r = 0.3; Spearmańs rho = 0.2; for PLR>150 and fibrinogen: Pearsońs r = 0.4; Spearmańs rho = 0.3).

We defined regions of interests (ROIs) in the areas where RHw task was highly significant (p<0.001, FWE corrected) and masked out any voxel that had significant activation (p<0.05 FWE corrected) in any other task.

Follow-up ANOVAs revealed highly significant differences on all four trait EI factors: Wellbeing, F (6,450) = 10.13, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.12; Self-control, F (6,450) = 10.13, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.16; Sociability, F (6,450) = 10.76, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.13; and Emotionality, F (6,450) = 15.70, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.13.