“highly significant”

Dance activities before the accident happened Highly significant gender differences (p<0.001) (Figure 2 ) were observed with movement contents where explicitly named jumps ( allegro , grand allegro, cabriole, grand jeté ) resulted in the most frequent traumatic injuries in males (sprains, pulled muscles).

Before fasting, PCSK9 exhibited a highly significant ( p < 0.001) moderate positive correlation with FBG ( r = 0.40), and weak positive correlations with TG ( r = 0.28) and HOMA-IR ( r = 0.35).

Regarding the general ability to understand emotions, there was a highly significant effect of age (F (1, 590) = 16.65, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.028) and non-verbal intelligence (F (1, 590) = 42.19, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.067).

Again, the highly significant ability of inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels by S. triloba were obvious ( P = 0.001), the finding that enforced the in vitro observation and voted for the high potential of S. triloba as inhibitor of many crucial steps of the angiogenesis process.

Using the log-rank test, we observed a highly significant survival rate in the low rSec62 group compared with the high rSec62 group among all lung cancer patients, and SCC patients ( P = 0.001 for all NSCLC patients, P = 0.001 for SCC patients, P = 0.054 for AC patients).

Standard deviations for individual species are typically <15% of the mean, and differences across the range of lipid content are highly significant (P <0.001 using student T-test).

Chi-square tests indicated highly significant differences in the proportions of both negative ( χ 2 = 33.719, P < 0.001) and positive ( χ 2 = 35.136, P < 0.001) cases among the different age groups, while Fisher's exact test for the borderline category showed no significant differences ( P = 0.806). 3.4.

Pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarity comparisons further confirmed this distinction, indicating highly significant compositional differences between the dysbiotic and native rhizospheres (p < 0.001; Supplementary File: Figure S1C ).

Statistical differences were interpreted as significant at p ≤ 0.05, highly significant at p ≤ 0.01, extremely significant at p ≤ 0.001 and not significant at p > 0.05.

The mean difference was − 2.87 (95% CI: -3.76 to -1.98), also highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Moreover, highly significant unpaired female worm burden reductions (83.7 to 100%) were achieved in the mouse model compared with infected untreated controls ( P <0.001).

A highly significant difference was also detected in the distribution of gender, aetiologies and age groups (each p = 0.001).

All the obtained values were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Exploratory analysis led to the observation that participants who obtained COVID-19 vaccine information from such sources also engaged in a higher number of channels for information gathering (median channels = 5 [interquartile range 3,7]) compared to those who did not (median channels = 3 [interquartile range 2,5]) and the difference is highly significant statistically ( Supplementary Table S4 ; p < 0.001).

The PERMANOVA test again demonstrated highly significant differences among clusters ( p = 0.001) with higher explanatory power (R 2 = 0.358 for K-Means and R 2 = 0.343 for Agglomerative), suggesting that three-cluster solutions captured more refined structural variations within the microbial community.

A comparison of the expression patterns of the microRNAs with the respective results in FISH (microRNA 34a and 200a—chromosome 1p; microRNA 409—chromosome 14) was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001).

The differences were highly significant: p < 0.001 for 25(OH)D and p = 0.003 for PTH (Wilcoxon rank sum test).

Candidates detected 21 deviations (31.3%), whereas examiners identified 168 deviations (67.5%)—a difference that was highly significant ( P <.001) ( Table 3 ).

In all the statistical evaluations, P < 0.05 was considered significant difference, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant difference, and P < 0.001 was considered very highly significant difference. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Preparation and characterization of PPH hydrogel Inspired by catechol-mediated mussel adhesion, we proposed a novel promising strategy for preparation of multifunctional hydrogel.

Correlation matrix analysis between shattering determinations and plant height for both populations (Table 2 ) detected highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlations within both plant height and shattering location-year combinations as well as between trait location-year combinations.

A repeated measures ANOVA with the factors category and confidence revealed a highly significant main effect of confidence ( F (1,27) = 88.083, P < 0.001; no other effects, P ≥ 0.694) such that high-confident hits yielded higher subsequent source accuracy than low-confident hits.

Further, there was a highly significant increase in CFE when the NRK cells were treated with the HCT116/BAG-1 siRNA CM (p≤0.001, Figure 4C ) which again was blocked by pre-incubation with the blocking antibody.

Overall, a highly significant correlation (p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.77) was observed (Figure 6 ), which confirms the quality of the presented transcriptional profiling.

Mixed effects model analysis showed that there were highly significant differences (p<0.001) between the 21–30 years group (youngest vaccinees) and the 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 groups, as well as a marginally significant difference (p = 0.092) between the 21–30 and the 61–72 years group ( Table 7 ).

The first subgroup analysis examined trials with fractures being prespecified as a primary endpoint, and the second focused on the highly significant results with a P value < .001.