Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Serum E1S showed a decrease in postmenopausal women with malignant breast tu- mors compared to those with benign breast tumors (P < 0.02) without any significant difference was found among the premenopausal groups. Estriol (E3) was only significantly increased during the luteal phase in women with malignantbreast tumors than their corresponding women with benign breast tumors (P < 0.05). Remarkably, over all the three different populations, Testosterone (T) showed a highly significant decrease in women with malignant breast tumors (P < 0.001 for follicular; P < 0.05 for luteal and P < 0.005 for postmenopausal respectively) (Table 3).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
3.3 Differences in tick infection rates and abundance among hosts Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values revealed highly significant differences in infection rates among host genera (P < 0.001), indicating a substantial impact of host genus on infection status.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) demonstrated a highly significant difference on the ipsilateral side, with a mean FA of 0.39 ± 0.013 in cases compared to 0.23 ± 0.013 in controls (t = 3.82, p < 0.001), suggesting disruption of frontotemporal connectivity pathways often affected in TLE.
highly significantP ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
and Nitrosomonadaceae were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001); Acidobacteria, Nocardioides, and Roseiflexaceae were significantly different ( P ≤ 0.01); and Pyrinomonadaceae, Gemmatimonadaceae, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi were also significantly different ( P ≤ 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean values of total cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL-C were higher in post-menopausal women than in peri-menopausal women and this difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001); similar results have been reported by other authors, including de Aloysio et al. in Italy [ 5 ], Stevenson et al., in England [ 22 ], and Gomina et al. in Benin [ 23 ].