“highly significant”

The repeated measures ANOVA of the within-session CoV revealed the impact of the volumetry tool to be highly significant (p < 0.001), whereas the tool * CART-based categorization interaction effect did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.595).

Differences between groups were considered as significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant when P < 0.001.

and Nitrosomonadaceae were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001); Acidobacteria, Nocardioides, and Roseiflexaceae were significantly different ( P ≤ 0.01); and Pyrinomonadaceae, Gemmatimonadaceae, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi were also significantly different ( P ≤ 0.05).

Correlation analysis ( Figure 8A ) revealed the following relationships: AMF colonization rate was significantly positively correlated with soil pH ( p < 0.05) and highly significantly positively correlated with AP ( p < 0.001), whereas it was significantly negatively correlated with SOM ( p < 0.05); colonization intensity showed a highly significant positive correlation with AP ( p < 0.001); spore density was significantly positively correlated with SOM ( p < 0.05) and urease (highly significant, p < 0.001), but highly significantly negatively correlated with TN ( p < 0.001).

Statistical correlation analyses were performed on more than 20 points collected on calcifications and indicate highly significant positive correlation for Ca and P (Pearson r: 0.9965; p ≤ 0.001), for Ca and Mg (Pearson r: 0.9646; p ≤ 0.002), and significant negative correlation for Ca and S (Pearson r: −0.8515; p ≤ 0.05).

Similarly, differences between the composition of the microbiota from pups from three different terrestrial habitats (Pilgrim's Haven [PH], Rona Rocks [RR], and Tarbet Slope [TS]) were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Exogenous melatonin treatment (MS) further dramatically increased the MT level to 505.0 μg·g -1 , which was 78.9% and 63.1% higher than that of the CK and S groups, respectively, and the differences between the groups all reached highly significant levels ( P <0.001).

Highly significant ( p < 0.001) but weak positive correlations were found among all biomarkers of inflammation, using Spearman’s correlation coefficient ( r s ): total leukocyte count and NLR ( r s = 0.263), total leukocyte count and CRP ( r s = 0.262), and NLR and CRP ( r s = 0.062).

The effect of sex was highly significant, with reduced CO in female offspring compared to males ( P < 0.001).

The mean values of total cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL-C were higher in post-menopausal women than in peri-menopausal women and this difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001); similar results have been reported by other authors, including de Aloysio et al. in Italy [ 5 ], Stevenson et al., in England [ 22 ], and Gomina et al. in Benin [ 23 ].

The estimated mean GWG was 14.2 kg in the control group and 13.3 kg in the intervention group, resulting in a highly significant reduction of 1 kg (95% CI (−1.56 to −0.38), p = 0.001) due to the intervention.

The high-dose treatments of ADSP (ADSP-HD) and AFP (AFP-HD) led to more pronounced reductions, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

These differences were found to be highly significant (p < 0.001) using the Chi square test.

Additional controls demonstrated that these responses required the presence of anti-CTLA-4 as the difference in treatment response was highly significant when comparing animals treated with hydrogels containing only 250 U HAse and those receiving anti-CTLA-4 plus 250 U HAse ( p < 0.001 by ANOVA; data not shown).

The structural parameters of the model with the intercept are highly significant ( p < 0.001). 6.

Detritus production Daily detritus production (mean±SD throughout) in pots containing sponges (all species combined; 12.3±10.5 mg DW) was considerably higher than controls without sponge (2.0±0.7 mg DW) and the difference was highly significant (linear mixed model, p<0.001, Fig. 5A ).

Results CT-Based Changes in Tumor Size after Two Cycles of Chemotherapy Across the study cohort, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a highly significant decrease in tumor diameter on CT (p<0.001) after two cycles of chemotherapy (mean size before therapy = 3.7 cm; range = 1.4–9.3 cm; mean size after two courses of chemotherapy = 2.8 cm; range = 0.7–7.3 cm).

The assortativity score for non-smokers registers as highly significant (Model 2, OR = 5.61; CI: 2.46, 12.80, p < 0.001; Model 3, OR = 4.91; CI: 2.10, 11.47, p < 0.001), signifying a pronounced tendency for non-smokers to form clusters within their social networks.

Highly significant increases in abundance in weight and number over time were detected for the deep-water rose shrimp ( P. longirostris ) ( p < 0.001, ρ = 0.737 and 0.804, respectively), the giant red shrimp ( A. foliacea ) ( p < 0.001, ρ = 0.692 and 0.599, respectively), and the blackspot seabream ( P. bogaraveo ) ( p < 0.01, ρ = 0.538 and p < 0.001, 0.634, respectively).

The effect of year fitted with the spline was highly significant for two species ( P. austriacus : df = 2.92, p < 0.001 and T. teniotis : df = 3.87, p = 0.026), suggesting a different inter-annual pattern among these species ( Figure 3 , Table 6 ). 4.

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001) in both instances (for males vs females, χ 2 = 53.3, Odds Ratio 3.1, 95% Confidence Interval 2.26 to 4.25; for non-White vs White, excluding the unknown group, χ 2 = 322.4, Odds Ratio 3.61, 95% Confidence Interval 3.13 to 4.16).

The analysis revealed highly significant differences between pre-test and post-test scores in all domains (p<0.001) demonstrating the statistical significance of our results (Table 3 ).

45.67 ± 8.79, 47.41 ± 10.15 and 50.86 ± 9.32 respectively) with highly significant different results ( p < 0.001).

Additionally, there was visually one outlier in the peripubertal inhibition correlation analysis; if that animal was removed, the positive correlation became highly significant (simple linear regression, Y = 2.377*X − 17.83, R-squared = 0.71, p = 0.001).

This interaction was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a very high likelihood ratio of 31.628 (largely elevated category).