“highly significant”

In contrast, nearly all of the differences observed between the controls and sorafenib- or sunitinb-treated samples were highly significant (p<0.001), both in volume and spatial distribution.

Differences between means were considered statistically significant for p values < 0.05 (*) and highly significant for p < 0.001 (***). 5.

However, there was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between both these conditions and the percentage of neutrophils internalising organisms in the ‘no serum’ samples.

Triglyceride values also tended to increase; however, the difference between the curves for the time from week 8 to week 24 from the blood samples taken from the animals’ tails, the rats given a sucrose solution (metabolic syndrome, MS) and the rats provided traditional food, was highly significant (P=0.001).

The group‐by‐time interaction was highly significant (F(4, 281.005)=96.985, p<0.001).

Bivariate associations A highly significant and strong association was observed between increasing mortality and increasingly poor service delivery (Relative risk [RR] = 1.21, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

The hospital variable block remained highly significant in the pooled Wald test ( χ 2 = 35.98 df = 6, p < 0.001), indicating persistent contextual mortality differences between hospitals after adjustment for the included treatment‐related factors.

We interpret this as follows: the discovery cohort had an extremely small sample size (only 6 pooled samples), and FDR correction tends to be overly conservative; however, all three candidate proteins exhibited highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) in ELISA assays conducted in an independent large-sample validation cohort ( n = 260).

The genotypic effect was highly significant for GP, GI, and VI (P< 0.001).

However, a highly significant interaction was demonstrated, F (1, 28) = 24.51; p < .001, indicating the no matter in which order the dyads took the experiment, individual sensitivity was significantly superior in the interactive versus noninteractive sessions; post hoc stats for interactive vs. noninteractive overall: t (29) = 5.01; p < .001; post hoc stats for int vs. nonint for I-NI group: t (15) = 2.91; p = .0107; post hoc stats for int versus nonint for NI-I group: t (13) = 4.55; p < .001.

Both estimators for α and β are highly significant (p < 0.001) 32 , and the mean pseudo-R 2 is 0.98 for the I p = 4 case and the I p = 10 case.

p value of <0.05 was considered significant; p value of <0.01, highly significant; and p value of <0.001, extremely significant. 5.

When loaded and non-loaded tibiae were compared in individual male mice, there was a highly significant difference in trabecular BV/TV (28.7%, p < 0.001) and Tb.Th (21.8%, p < 0.001).

All comparisons (pooled values for all categories) were highly significant ( p < 0.001) with moderate effect sizes.

A highly significant overall effect of time on albumin levels was observed (p<0.001).

The main effect of condition was also highly significant (F(1, 1545) = 34172.94, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.957), showing that deviant stimuli elicited stronger θ-β coupling than standard stimuli in both groups.

(2) generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) and structural equation models revealed that vegetation type exhibited a highly significant effect on soil aggregates ( p < 0.001), including both karst soil and vegetation-restored soil, during a homogeneous garden experiment.

As observed in Table 2 , the differences encountered between the means on openness to change (OC) and self-transcendence (ST) before and after CME intervention were highly significant ( P <0.001) according to the values of the t tests.

Both the percentage of success achieved and the number of attempts required to achieve successful intubation showed highly significant associations with the airway management technique used ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant correlations were found between G and P n in all treatments both in summer ( r from 0.79 to 0.86, P < 0.001) and winter ( r from 0.74 to 0.89, P < 0.001; Fig. 6 ).

Bindin population structure Population differentiation (Φ ST = 0.220) between Bamfield and Sandspit was strong and highly significant ( P < 0.001).

A highly significant increase ( p < 0.001) in vaccination rates was observed for both groups during our study.

Frequency specific STNr LFP activity contributes to release reaction time and rate of force release A generalised linear model with normalised power in the theta/alpha, low beta and high gamma/high frequency (but not low gamma bands) during grip release was highly significant in explaining the variance in R-RT (likelihood ratio χ 2 = 20.229, df = 4, p < 0.001).

Significance was reported using standard academic conventions, with stars indicating levels of significance: * p < 0.05 (Significant); ** p < 0.01 (Highly Significant); *** p < 0.001 (Very Highly Significant).

The median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients classified as responders by DECT reached 623 days, compared with a mere 104 days for nonresponders, representing a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).