Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
20 We cannot discriminate between the relative impact of epilepsy per se, seizures or ASD therapy on cerebellar dysfunction and atrophy, but the association of cerebellar atrophy and the calculated lifetime drug load of the four most frequent ASDs (carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital, and valproate) was highly significant ( p < .001).
highly significantP -values < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found no significant difference for sex and age category (chi-square test, P -values 0.972 and 0.64) and highly significant differences in country, transmission mode, ethnicity, and viral subtype (chi-square test, all P -values < .001).
The genetic architecture of HIV-1 virulence.
Virus Evol · 2025 · PMC12684972
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The MANOVA multivariate analysis used to define the significance of the analyzed characters, shows that Mw, Ml, Mm, Sw, Sl, l/w and CSa, are highly significant ( p < 0.001), while CSw, CVw and CV w/t are not very significant ( p < 0.05), and the characters CVt, CCSl and CS w/t are not significant.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Validation of dynamic modulators of PH in the VCTE‐HVPG cohort Using a larger validation cohort undergoing VCTE‐based fibrosis assessment ( n = 245), the correlation of liver stiffness measurement–based fibrosis to HVPG remained highly significant (Rho = 0.638, p < 0.001), and the regression model fitting line was similar to the CPA‐HVPG model.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The chi-square test revealed a highly significant deviation between the observed and expected breakpoint distributions (χ 2 (1, N = 31) = 15.80, P < 0.001), leading us to reject the null hypothesis and concluding that intron 5 is a breakpoint hotspot region ( Table 2 ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As shown in Table 3 , the overall mean score was 7.30, with the standard deviation (SD) of 3.52; the mean difference was 30.4; and the paired t -test value was 16.047, which shows a highly significant difference at P < 0.001.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interventions such as art-based programs, support services, and clinician-led mental health and psychosocial services effectively decrease mental health issues among children and adolescents.[ 6 ] The prevalence of any predictive psychiatric disorder before the lockdown was 20.5% and within lockdown was 39.7%, and the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For individuals with small IQ differences, we found small to medium relationships that were all highly significant (β = .29 for the IDS-2 FSIQ(7) and German to β = .52 for the RIAS ABIQ(2) and German, all with p < .001), and there were no significant differences in betas between the GICs.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The likelihood-ratio statistic for the null hypothesis that study affiliation has no effect on SSPS score is highly significant ( P < 0.001) so that it can be concluded that there is a strong association between study and score, with Warwick participants being more likely than those reported by Freeman et al.
A high-fidelity virtual environment for the study of paranoia.
Schizophr Res Treatment · 2013 · PMC3877649
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The median time spent on the general instructions page was also 3.0 sec, and the relationship between time spent on the instructions and the time spent on the prompt page was highly significant ( p <0.001), making time spent on the instructions page a good variable to control for potential differences that may exist in participants who spend more or less time reading text.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There were few significant differences in neighbourhood characteristics, except for parks ( p = 0.040) and health service destinations ( p = 0.019) for those with and without diabetes; however, there was a highly significant difference in both slope mean ( p < 0.001) and slope tertile distribution ( p < 0.001) between adults with and without diabetes.