“highly significant”

A highly significant increase ( p < 0.001) in vaccination rates was observed for both groups during our study.

A172 cells exhibited a similar dose‐dependent reduction in viability, with significant effects observed at 100 nM ( p < 0.05) and 200 nM ( p < 0.01), and highly significant reductions at higher concentrations ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant ( P < 0.001) interaction was found between neighborhood safety and attitude toward physical activity for each physical activity and sedentary behavior, except for excessive C/VG use ( P = 0.13) ( Table 5 ).

Following PSM, the intergroup difference remained highly significant (2.50 cm vs. 5.82 cm, p < 0.001).

On using post-hoc tests, regarding serum calcium, there were highly significant differences on comparing each group to the other (p<0.001), as was the case with PTH (p<0.001).

Across all years, the Kruskal-Wallis test yielded highly significant results (p < 0.001), indicating significant differences in dengue incidence among the three categories.

All three animals, however, showed a highly significant correlation between the delay of hyoid depression (delay relative to start of mouth opening) and duration of mouth opening ( r 22 = 0.772; p < 0.001). 3.3.

Two of these nine proteins, NES and SOD1, showed a highly significant differential expression (p < 0.001) in four out of five amniocyte pairs (Table 3 ).

Among these, food biomass exerted a highly significant positive effect ( β = 0.85 ± 0.14, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.11, p < 0.001), while distance to roads had a significant negative effect ( β = −0.47 ± 0.07, 95% CI: −0.69 to −0.26, p < 0.001). 4.

First, analyzing the effects of history and environment at fixed immigration levels revealed that historical source, environmental medium, and their interaction all had highly significant effects on community composition variation across all three immigration treatments (control, higher, highest) and at both time points ( p = 0.001, Table 1 ).

Statistical comparisons revealed highly significant differences between AE patients and controls ( p < .001 for most subgroups), whereas differences between AE subgroups were not significant, suggesting a uniform elevation of this chemokine across AE phenotypes ( Figure 1 ).

In Figure 1 , the fit of the model was highly significant ( R 2 = 0.9541, p < 0.001).

The overall association was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Spearman rank correlation analysis of the two different methods of measuring area, directly from specimen images or as the product of length and width, was highly significant (rho = 0.9878, p<<0.001), suggesting that product area is an accurate means of estimating tooth area.

Repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences between experienced and new hearing aid users (F(1,76) = 0.967, p = 0.329), but highly significant differences between intervention and control groups (F(1,76) = 93.46, p < 0.001), indicating substantial training effects on processing speed regardless of hearing aid experience.

The correlation between age of opium users and duration of taking opium regularly was highly significant ( r = 0.485; p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant effect of Trial Type ( F = 29.84, df = 1, 100, p < 0.001) demonstrating strong PL over the entire session (i.e., shorter RTs on pattern relative to random trials; Figure 2 ).

Highly significant correlations were found between the number of all drugs taken and numbers of medical visits ( r =+0.49; P <0.001) and healthcare visits ( r =+0.35; P =0.0005) ( Table 1 ).

Additionally, the association between migraine-attributed disability and lost household work time or total lost productivity (paid + household) was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in almost all countries studied.

A highly significant correlation was revealed in a region in the left middle frontal gyrus ( Z = 4.18; P < 0.001 (uncorrected); x = −30, y = 28, z = 40) that corresponds roughly to the prefrontal cortex area described in Blair et al.

Priming treatments showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) across all germination and emergence traits, indicating their dominant role in determining seed performance.

The difference between the political meaning scores’ of socialism ( M = 2.52, SD = .94) and conservatism-referent words ( M = 4.95, SD = .99) was highly significant, t (52) = 10.05, p <.001.

Statistical significance was defined as follows: p>0.05, not significant (ns); p<0.05, significant; p<0.01, highly significant; and p<0.001, extremely significant.

For the TNC‐pre model (Table 6 ), the intercept estimate was 6.544 (SE = 0.265), representing the mean TNC count in the BTC twin group and was highly significant ( t = 24.696, p < 0.001).

The interaction between AF and the Deep-minus-Surface score was highly significant, F(1, 1626) = 64.29, p < 0.001, indicating that the relationship between relative learning orientation and marks differed clearly by AF.