This demonstrated a highly significant ( P = 0.001) ipsilateral decrease in brain metabolic activity within the peak pressure field, demonstrating high spatial specificity of PhoCUS neuromodulation ( Fig. 4 B ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
For the city-level analysis using SafeGraph data, we find that the increase in victimization risk is highly significant ( P < 0.001), as the crime measures are not a sample and the citywide decline in activity inferred from SafeGraph is precisely measured.
In spleen, there was a highly significant ( p <0.001) reduction with oral and intraperitoneal doses of 200 and 100 mg/kg bw, of SCD-1.
The hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that there was highly significant ( p = 0.001) genetic diversification among the five C. japonicum populations ( Table 2 ).
Indeed, a highly significant correlation between VvMYBPA1 and VvLAR2 ( r = 0.688; p ≤ 0.001) was found.
The insulin resistance index was higher in cases compared to controls and the difference was highly significant ( P = 0.001).
19 The overall trimmed model was highly significant, F (5, 196)=18.55, P<0.001.
In contrast, gH625-tagged amygdalin-loaded phase-convertible nanodroplets (MDP) exhibited a highly significant reduction in cell viability across all tested concentrations ( p ≤ 0.001).
Data were regarded as significantly different at p<0.05 and as highly significant at p<0.001.
However, the interaction of stimulation by risk-to-lose got highly significant in the overall model ( z = 6.60, p < 0.001).
The pairwise comparison of mortality rates showed no significant differences between defoliation classes 1 and 2, but there were highly significant differences between all other combinations of defoliation classes ( P < 0.001).
A moderate, highly significant negative correlation was observed between FLAIR and FA (ρ = −0.345, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.170).
The analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (P < 0.001) for the quantitatively measured traits ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
Within small ruminants, a highly significant disparity was detected among Ovis aries , Capra hircus , and Capreolus capreolus (F2,176 = 38.59, p < 0.001), with Ovis aries showing the largest average centroid size (CS), followed by Capra hircus , while Capreolus capreolus consistently exhibited the smallest values.
Data were considered statistically significant at a P ≤ 0.01 and highly significant at a P < 0.001.
The statistical analysis of the obtained data showed a highly significant effect of the electro-activation time ( p < 0.001), whereas the effect of the applied electric current was intensity-dependent.
We found highly significant differences in OS among the three groups (P < 0.001; Figure 3A ), with corresponding 5-year OS rates of 17.0% for high-risk group, 26.3% for intermediate-risk group, and 54.0% for low-risk group.
To statistically compare the FIT values of these 3 models using bootstrapping, a 1-way ANOVA was carried out with 1 between-subjects factor with 3 levels (the 3 models), and this was highly significant, F (2, 297) = 72.83, P < .001.
The coefficient is negative and highly significant (β = −0.220, p < 0.001).
This apparent divergence of r 2 values between leaves (including Equisetum telmateia branches) and stems (including woody samples) was highly significant ( P < 0.001; independent samples Mann–Whitney test).
In all cognitive measures, one-way ANOVA tests revealed highly significant group effects (all p < 0.001), with post hoc Tukey comparisons indicating that the “female better” cluster consistently outperformed the other groups on nearly all CVLT variables, similar patterns were observed for the RPM and EHI measures, although the differences between the higher-performing clu
Finally, the interaction between time and concentration was highly significant ( p < 0.001) only for the Se-GPx measure in the digestive gland and on the SOD measured in the gills ( Table 1 ).
The analysis showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the two groups of ewes in the two periods for the intake of all individuals and groups of FA from the diets.
The addition of sodium chloride led to a highly significant increase in renal sodium and chloride excretion ( p < 0.001).
30 Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant ( χ 2 (231) = 1675.784, P < 0.001), indicating that correlation between items was sufficiently large for factor analysis. 30 A CFA was conducted to test fit to the original two-factor structure. 11 Robust maximum likelihood estimation was used, given moderate violations of normality.