“highly significant”

A total of 153 highly significant ( p < .001) environmental variables were retained after forward selection, including 131 spatial variations, 10 energy variables (MAT, MDR, ISO, TS, MTWM, MTCM, MTWetQ, MTDQ, MTCQ, and WD), 8 significant water variables (MAP, PDM, PS, PWetQ, PDQ, PWarmQ, MI, and AET), 2 habitat heterogeneity‐related variables (ER and RMAP), and 2 human activity‐related variables (GDP and AOC) (Extended Data Table S2 ).

Furthermore, a highly significant variation in seroprevalences rates (χ 2 = 130.9, P < 0.001) was observed by the geographic origin of animals, the region of Guelmim-Oued Noun was the one with the higher rate ( 87.3% ; 48/55) (Fig. 2 ).

As highlighted in Table 9 , all WHOs negatively impacted the mean time across all participants when completing ADL1 and ADL2, with most having a significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.001) detrimental impact.

Moreover, both caudal carotid artery sensors (Channels #3 and #4) demonstrated highly significant (p < 0.001) increases in firing frequency during the first interval of 0–20%, while the rostral sensors (Channels #1 and #2) also captured increased firing, but to a lesser degree than the caudal sensors (Channels #3 and #4) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4 ).

Extreme limiting dilution analysis uncovered a highly significant ( P < .001; likelihood ratio test) fivefold reduced frequency of leukemia-restoring cells (LRCs) after RUNX1 :: RUNX1T1 knockdown, whereas mismatch control cells showed no significant difference in LRC frequencies compared to mock-treated cells ( Figure 7 G).

When looking at prestimulus alpha power, we found a highly significant main effect of pupil bin on alpha power ( Fig. 4 b ; F (1,998) = 108.27; p < 0.001).

This result was confirmed by the one-way ANOVA with the within factor Condition (Baseline, Adaptation, Neutral) which revealed a highly significant main effect [ F (2 , 48) = 128.21; p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.646, LogBF 10 = 19.6] explained by Adaptation being different from both Baseline and Neutral (all p s < 0.001; Tukey-Kramer correction) and Baseline not being different from Neutral ( p = 0.49).

To quantify the prevalence of nuclear function proteins among D/E repeat proteins, we determined which GO IDs (retrieved from STRING DB) were enriched two-fold or more among these proteins ( Figure 6 , these enrichments were highly significant with Fisher exact p values <0.001, unless marked otherwise).

ANOVA showed very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in AL in AcCG, when compared to PACS and controls.

All pairwise comparisons were highly significant ( p < 0.001), further supporting these conclusions ( Table S4 ).

For all strains, growth decrease with 10 mg ml −1 bLF compared to zero was highly significant ( P <0.001), and with 1 mg ml −1 for some strains ( P ≤0.02).

Spearman's correlation rho values are highly significant among all different grades (rho = 0.99, P < 0.001).

Doing so left our primary results substantively unchanged, with all Condition × Time point interactions remaining highly significant ( P < 0.001). † Here, we assume that the effect of condition depends linearly on log-income.

This demonstrated a highly significant ( P = 0.001) ipsilateral decrease in brain metabolic activity within the peak pressure field, demonstrating high spatial specificity of PhoCUS neuromodulation ( Fig. 4 B ).

For the city-level analysis using SafeGraph data, we find that the increase in victimization risk is highly significant ( P < 0.001), as the crime measures are not a sample and the citywide decline in activity inferred from SafeGraph is precisely measured.

However, highly significant differences were observed in both the posttest (t = 14.289, P < 0.001) and follow-up (t = 12.002, P < 0.001) results in favor of the intervention group.

Results and discussion Bioactive compounds Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (p<0.001) among the 21 highbush blueberry cultivars for all measured phytochemical parameters, demonstrating substantial genetic variation within commercial germplasm.

Relative risk analysis of non-susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam across isolates from the three study sites revealed a highly significant association for OXA-1 ( P < 0.001), whereas no significant associations were observed for TEM-1 ( P = 0.424) or the combination of OXA-1 and TEM-1 ( P = 0.082).

Most importantly, skills in performing opera showed a significant increase from pre-intervention ( M = 65.3, SD = 8.2) to post-intervention ( M = 78.9, SD = 7.1), with a t-statistic yielding a statistically highly significant difference, t (198) = 14.27, p < 0.001, with a large effect size, d = 1.73.

The analysis was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with an AUC of 0.739 (95% CI: 0.651–0.827).

We additionally verified that the observed correlation was highly significant by permuting gene labels in the ABC dataset ( p value < 0.001 over 1000 permutations).

In fact at 5 min, the difference in mean TER (% of control value) between butaprost and AH6809 treated group (85% vs 116%) was highly significant (p<0.001).

The mean percentual deviations are summarized in Table 1 , the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

When we assessed the relationship between menstruation before and after using isotretinoin, we found that 40 participants (10.4%) from those with known regular periods before isotretinoin treatment had reported irregular periods after using isotretinoin, which is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

PCI had the highest proportion in the VA/BA group (83.3%), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).