“highly significant”

Comparing Ob-Gyn responses regarding screening often or always for APOs to the frequency of screening in the other fields, the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).

The item “patient personality perceived to be difficult” was a highly significant predictor ( p < 0.001) of all three subscales of burnout.

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.73, which is above the recommended value of 0.60, and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was found to be highly significant (Χ 2 = 1.830, p < 0.001).

Excretion of cortisol in HFA group showed no significant alteration from the control group (Phase I: 43.8 ± 4.43 vs 46.5 ± 6.60, 95% CI 43.16-49.84 P = 0.179; Phase II: 21.1 ± 2.87 vs 22.5 ± 2.52, 95% CI 21.22-23.78 P = 0.352; Phase III: 9.9 ± 1.20 vs 9.0 ± 0.97, 95% CI 8.51-9.49 P = 0.177, post-hoc Bonferroni test) but showed a highly significant alteration at the phases I (74.3 ± 8.62 vs 46.5 ± 6.60, P < 0.001), II (62 ± 7.68 vs 22.5 ± 2.52, P < 0.001), and III (40 ± 5.73 vs 9 ± 0.97, P < 0.001) when compared to LFA group.

A highly significant ( p <0.001) increase in the serum CRP, ferritin, WBC count and neutrophils count was observed among the positive COVID-19 patients as compared to controls; lymphocytes count was highly significantly ( p <0.001) decreased when compared to controls, as shown in Table 2 .

Significant (P < 0.05) to very highly significant (P < 0.001) variation was also observed for seed quality traits such as volatile oil and oleoresin contents.

However, the analysis did show a highly significant (p<0.001) negative correlation between SerpinB2 and T-bet mRNA levels ( Fig. 3B ).

The Type 3 score test indicated a highly significant main effect of cluster (χ 2 = 62.54, p < 0.001).

Kruskal–Wallis statistics for bite rate were 229.6 for sheep identity and 134.1 for vegetation class, and for step rate, 100.6 and 55.11, respectively, all highly significant ( p < .001).

Furthermore, the “inferotemporal” region highlighted by Grad-CAM encompasses the vascular arcades extending into the inferior retina (region 4), where our statistical analysis confirmed a highly significant reduction in vessel density ( P < 0.001).

The highest log2(FC) values were achieved by miR-223-3p (3.78) and miR-212-3p (3.48), each with a highly significant p -value < 0.001.

Furthermore, highly significant reductions of both the E058Δ iucA Δ iutA and E058Δ iucC Δ iutA double mutants were observed in all five tested tissues ( P <0.001).

The p-value is highly significant (p < .001).

In fact, the 3‐microRNA signature was consistently deregulated in a meta‐analysis performed on 15 different human and mouse datasets and revealed a highly significant pooled effect ( z = 5.33, P < 0.001) and standardized mean difference of 1.44 [lower interval: 0.91, upper interval: 1.98] (Fig 5I ).

The effect of recall accuracy was highly significant and in the expected direction ( F (1,283) = 27.88; p < .001; M major triads = 0.65; SD major triads = 0.33; M arbitrary trichords = 0.45; SD arbitrary trichords = 0.30).

With respect to the valence ANOVA there was, unsurprisingly a highly significant effect [ F (1, 60) = 178.87, p < 0.001].

From the neonatal aspect, there was a highly significant difference between all groups regarding birth weight ( P < 0.001).

The AMOVA analysis on the 29 accessions ( Table 2 ) prior to grouping revealed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) differentiation among the accessions accounting for 5.4% of the total variation.

The variable was highly significant (Anova, analysis of deviance: df = 16, P < 0.001), and a dispersion factor of 1.004 indicated a good model fit.

CS and FS showed highly significant increasing trends ( p < 0.001).

The mean ages were 44.1 ± 5.5 years in PERI, 52.6 ± 3.9 years in early PM, and 57.7 ± 5.4 years in late PM, with highly significant differences among groups (ANOVA F = 142.33, p < 0.001); post hoc analyses confirmed a stepwise increase (PERI < early PM < late PM, all p < 0.001).

This was highly significant for the arterial range of 200–599 μm (p<0.001) ( figure 4b , c, d, e).

We found a highly significant negative effect of timing (β = -0.206; 95% confidence interval = [-0.213,-0.199]; t (58478) = -55.88; p < 0.001), with a smaller random effect of image identity (β = 0.101; CI = [0.093, 0.109]).

The PLSR analysis revealed that sex had a highly significant effect on facial form (R 2 = 0.2416, p < 0.001), after adjusting for age (R 2 = 0.0154) but not size.

Compared with control lines, fibroblasts of the intermediately affected group were found to have about 40% reduced levels of PlsEtn, while those derived from patients with severe phenotype displayed a more pronounced reduction of more than 70% representing a highly significant linear trend between the three examined groups ( P < 0.001).