The obtained results were interpreted as, insignificant P > 0.05, significant P < 0.01, highly significant P < 0.001 Observations Out of 60 patients, the maximum (37%) belonged to age between 45 to 55 years. 50% and 60% patients were male in group A and B respectively.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There was a highly significant main effect of time (F1,71 = 1491.4, p < 0.001), with both groups achieving normal or near-normal Hb levels by three months.
Given the markedly different prognostic strengths of the anatomic components in our cohort—N stage exhibiting a highly significant association with PFS ( P < 0.001), while T stage demonstrated a much weaker effect ( P ═ 0.011)—the combined AJCC/UICC stage group was excluded from the multivariate model.
Higher levels of lactate, PCT, NEWS, and LP-NEWS scores are associated with higher APACHE II and SOFA scores, all highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The difference was highly significant for all general and other care tasks ( p ≤ 0.001).
Phenotypic Performance and Variance Components Very high heritabilities across locations for both seed yield (0.90) and protein content (0.94) in conjunction with a lower, however highly significant ( p < 0.001), genotype-by-location interaction variance component ( σ G L 2 ), illustrate a moderate level of genotype-by-location interaction ( Table 2 ).
In these two cases, the variation in transmission bias is supported by highly significant heterogeneity G -tests (multilocus genotype 45: G = 32.750, P <0.001; multilocus genotype 58: G = 27.534, P = 0.001).
There were highly significant positive correlations between perception of vulnerability (PERC_VULN) and perception of risk of illness (PERC_RISK_ILL), r(250) = 0.48, p < 0.001; (PERC_VULN) and perception of risk of vaccination (PERC_RISK_VACC), r(250) = 0.21, p < 0.001; preventive behavior (PREV_BEHAV) and PERC_RISK_VACC, r(250) = 0.25, p < 0.001.
Other predictors (covariates or control variables) in the models The predictors birthdate, breed and growth phase were highly significant (P value<0.001) in our regression models for all five outcomes).
Further, the biofilm inhibitory potential was also found to be more significant ( p < 0.01) at 100 μg/mL of PCF and PBP, while it showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) biofilm inhibition at 150 and 200 μg/mL concentrations.
The temperature × mint interaction was highly significant for respiratory rate (P < 0.001).
Results The mean AOFAS score at follow-up was 78.4 ± 21.8, and the modified Cincinnati rating was 6.6 ± 2.6; the improvement from the preoperative values was highly significant in both scores ( P < 0.001 in the paired, 2-sided t test).
Mean cross-sectional area There is a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in meanCSA in all protrusion steps and all parts of the pharynx of 20.0 mm 2 (± 9.8) per millimeter.
Analysis based on the intervention program revealed that for the resistance + aerobic exercise group, the results of the meta-analysis were highly significant (MD = 3.98; 95% CI: 1.89 to 6.06; I 2 = 98.0%; P < 0.001).
RSM optimization of SCP (A), NZA (C), glycerol (D), and Na 2 HPO 4 ·7H 2 O (L) generated a highly significant quadratic model ( P < 0.001) with non-significant lack-of-fit ( P = 0.297) (Tables S8-9).
Post-hoc tests also revealed highly significant differences between targets and distractors for all target visiting orders (all p < 0.001) (Figure 5A ).
Of these six (35.3%) found a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase [ 27 , 28 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 40 ].
There was a highly significant improvement from the preoperative stage to the last follow-up for all values ( p < 0.001).
The results (Table S3) demonstrated that the comprehensive score model was highly significant ( P < 0.001, P = 0.004), with a non-significant lack-of-fit term ( P = 0.8265), indicating a satisfactory fit.
Monthly testing of febrile cases increased from a health facility mean of 31.2% to 76.3% following implementation across the three intervention districts, a highly significant improvement compared with the control district, where mean monthly facility testing rates declined from 50.8% to 41.8% (Z = 4.71, p < 0.001, adjusting for all facility-level covariates).
There was a strong and highly significant correlation between the total and the MAP species numbers (r s = 0.77, p < 0.001), and the two most species-rich sites, Žuklijai and Pamiškė, contained the highest total and MAP species numbers.
A highly significant difference was observed between participants’ educational levels regarding storage behavior scores ( p = 0.001; ANOVA test), particularly for participants with a bachelor’s degree, who had the most significant mean difference compared to the non-educated participants ( p < 0.05; Multiple Comparison LSD).
Moreover, they found a highly significant negative correlation between p16 immunopositivity and CDKN2A promoter methylation (P < 0.001).
The difference between the two time points is highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney, Fig. 2b , Supplementary Fig.
At 6 months, patients treated with 80 mg olezarsen experienced a mean triglyceride reduction of 43.5%, a highly significant improvement compared with placebo ( p <0.001).