“highly significant”

Infection resulted in a highly significant total indirect effect on the long COVID phenome (t = 8.92, p < 0.001).

Both photoperiod (Type III Wald Test, X 2 = 4.835, Df = 1, p = 0.027) and ALAN (Type III Wald Test, X 2 = 9.637, Df = 1, p = 0.002) exhibited significant effects on glycogen level; and a highly significant joint effect was also measured (Type III Wald Test, X 2 = 12.222, Df = 1, p < 0.001).

A statistical analysis highlighted how not only the treatment and the time had a significant effect on the adult emergence, but also the interaction between these two sources of variability resulted as highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).

Uptake of Applied Lolines The plant species and endophytes had a highly significant effect on the total number of aphids per tiller ( p < 0.001) pre-application of lolines.

The Spearman correlation coefficient was highly significant between the dietary protein intake (g) and true protein ( r = 0.997; p < 0.001), and the protein intake (% kcal) and true protein in the HM ( r = 0.995; p < 0.001).

The found model, in Table 4 , was highly significant, χ 2 (12) = 177.623, p < .001, Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.20.

We also found that the effects of consumers’ perceived pleasure on consumers’ purchase intentions were highly significant (β=0.795, p<0.001), thus supporting H8.

AF group compared to non AF group; had a highly significant increase in LAVI (40.65 ± 11.24 vs. 28.34 ± 6.07 ml/m 2 ), E/é (12.19 ± 0.83 vs. 6.3 ± 0.98) and LVSI (0.14 ± 0.01vs. 0.06 ± 0.01 ml −1 ), p < 0.001, and a highly significant decrease in posterior wall thickness in systole (PWs); (12 ± 1.7 vs. 13.6 ± 1.2 mm), DWS (0.28 ± 0.08 vs. 0.38 ± 0.10), EDV(128.64 ± 5.59 vs. 154.81 ± 11.99 ml), SVI (43.43 ± 3.88 vs. 59.61 ± 9.12 ml/m 2 ) and EF (57.78 ± 3.39 vs. 65.56 ± 6.1%), p < 0.001, Table 2 .

However, while the overall p value for a PERMANOVA analysis of the fecal and cecal data was highly significant ( p < 0.001) after Bonferroni correction individual comparisons did not show any significant changes in fecal samples (data not shown).

The main effect of temperature was highly significant for both distance measures, with substantially higher within‐population beta diversity at 22°C, compared to 15°C ( p < .001, Figure 3i , Figure S2I ).

We found no significant difference between landmarking events (original or repeat) ( F 1,19 = 0.3655, p = 0.5526), but highly significant differences between individual specimens ( F 19,19 = 159.77, p < 0.001).

As IL‐17A could induce IL‐13, a highly significant correlation between those two factors (r>0.5; p<0.001, respectively) could be observed in MC and VAC but not in ICU (Fig. 3C ) [ 28 ].

A highly significant increase in pretreatment PSA levels was observed among prostate cancer cases ( p < 0.001; Table 1 , Fig. 1 A). 3.2.

The difference in BCR between each of the 3 groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001), wherein the high group had a higher probability of BCR. 4.

There is an argument that the same would not apply to judging QOL impact, since the clinician does not see the dog in its home environment, but the result of the analysis was remarkably similar with highly significant time window effects ( p < 0.001) and all post-treatment means were significantly lower than pre-treatment.

The increase in ADC was found to be highly significant (uncorrected p < 0.001) in many GM and WM regions.

Notably, the increase in CD127 + γδ Tcell frequencies was highly significant in BAL at d1 (P<0.001) and 1-week (P=0.001) that returned to baseline by 3-week time-point, when BCG was likely cleared as no live bacteria was recovered from BAL fluid at that time.

In this case, the regression between the base 10 logarithm of the amount of copies per milliliter and the number of infected individuals is highly significant (Y = 1.24 (±0.13) + 0.08 (±0.01)X; r2 = 0.81; F 1,12 = 50.8; P < 0.001).

The individuals with CC homozygous (Val/Val) and TT homozygous (Met/Met) showed a highly significant difference with a p- value of <0.001, but between CT heterozygous (Val/Met) and TT homozygous (Met/Met), it was found to be significant at only p = 0.002 ( Figure 2C ).

A two-way MANOVA on log 10 -transformed R, G and B luminances of the 6 colour characters indicated that habitat, locality and habitat-locality interaction were all highly significant (habitat, Pillai’s Trace = 0.450, F 6,201 = 27.44, P < 0.001; locality, Pillai’s trace = 0.479, F 18,609 = 6.43, P < 0.001; interaction, Pillai’s trace =0.285, F 18,609 = 3.55, P < 0.001).

Interestingly, the roughly 3-fold decrease in the rate of intubation seen in nosocomial cases (5.2%) compared to community cases (13.9%) remained highly significant even after correcting for patient age and length of stay (ß = -1.49; SE = 0.44; p < 0.001).

The two-way interactions between the power of CP and time of CP had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on the α-amylase activity ( Table 6 ).

The analysis revealed that the level of TREM2 gene expression was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) and greater in tissues of SKCM patients than in normal tissues ( Figure 1(a) ).

Multiple regression analysis for “Reference Angle α” by instrument position shows highly significant differences between violin position A1 and all other instrument positions ( N = 90, p < 0.001, r 2 = 0.353).

The findings show a highly significant correlation between perceived usefulness and purchase intention ( β = 0.306, t = 8.041, p < 0.001), implying that H1 is accepted.