“highly significant”

A logistic regression analysis analyzing preoperative feasibility assessment of IORT yielded highly significant test results for the variables “clinical tumor size (cT)” ( p = 0.0014; OR 3.102) and “tumor–skin distance” measured by ultrasound ( p < 0.0001; OR 0.026).

In this case, GM1‐induced change was highly significant ( P = 0.0014).

This difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0014).

This dissimilarity is further confirmed by the Log‐rank test, indicating a highly significant disparity ( p = 0.0014, Figure 1 ). 3.3.

Acute Treatment with Typical and Atypical Antidepressants Induce Positive Affective Biases in Rats Acute treatment with the serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), fluoxetine, induced a highly significant positive bias in rats (0.3–3.0 mg/kg, RM ANOVA, F 3,45 =6.10, p =0.0014, Figure 2a ).

Analysis of the concatenated uidA and mutS data with MULTILOCUS yielded highly significant but low θ values when comparing isolates from the Roodeplaat dam catchment with those from the Rietvlei dam catchment ( θ = 0.012 , p = 0.0014) or when comparing phylogroup B2 isolates from the two catchments ( θ = 0.031 , p = 0.0104).

Linear models demonstrated a highly significant effect of the strain factor (χ 2 = 483.04, p = 0.001425) on the MTBE tolerance and on the PFOA tolerance (χ 2 = 590.87, p = 4.613 × 10 −10 ) by suggesting a high variability among the strains in response to both POPs tested ( Supplementary Data Set S6 ).

When these breeds are excluded, the correlation becomes stronger and highly significant (Pearson correlation = −0.859119; P value = 0.001449).

The cervix, characterized by extremely low richness and evenness, differed markedly from neonatal placental samples, which exhibited higher but heterogeneous alpha-diversity; all indices were highly significant in both cohorts (Chao1 p = 0.00145 in LP; p = 0.000923 in TP; Shannon p = 0.00031 in LP and p = 0.000931 in TP) ( Figures 4 , 5 ).

This variable was highly significant in the model (p = 0.0015).

These observations are confirmed by median tests comparing the intensity of bleaching between both events, which show highly significant differences for all five species in September/October ( p = 0.0015 in all cases), for two species in February ( O. annularis , p = 0.0396; P. astreoides , p = 0.0496), and just one species in June ( O. annularis , p = 0.0360) ( Table 1 ).

Firstly, we observed a highly significant association between NPM1 and DNA methylation gene mutations (Fisher’s Exact test, p = 0.0015), whereas the association between FLT3 -ITD and NPM1 mutations did not reach significance.

This differential response was highly significant ( p = 0.0015). 2.6.

According to the TukeyHSD test for the bark volume, only the two independent variables ‘reference’ and ‘diameter’ differed in a highly significant ( p = 0.0015) way from one other.

8a ), with intact transport averaging only about 20% (22.784 ± 5.493), a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0015, Fig. 8b ).

Excluding the more severe forms (nephrotic syndrome and AKI) in G1, reduction of proteinuria remained highly significant (from 1.1 [0.43–1.6] g/g to 0.3 [0.13–0.5] g/g, P = 0.0015) ( Figure 2 ).

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference in RTL between SA with aneuploid and SA with euploid karyotype (aneuploid: 0.29 ± 0.03 vs euploid: 0.64 ± 0.12, P = 0.0015) (Fig. 3 ).

However, after removing the outlier, a highly significant positive correlation was found between HearNPV and Cry1Ac resistance (r = 0.81, p = 0.0015).

Based on a new approach of deriving a gross genome assembly from deposited genomic Illumina paired-end reads, we present six retroposon markers as highly significant evidence of the clade Castorimorpha (Castoridae + Geomyoidea) (p < 0.0015).

The trend, however, was highly significant (trend p = 0.0015 and p = 0.0005, respectively).

This was highly significant as compared to the HITAC ( P = .0015).

Statistical comparison using a paired t -test revealed a highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.0015), as illustrated in Figure 1 A.

Case-control analysis by stage revealed no difference in OS in stage I-III patients but a highly significant benefit in OS in the stage IV driver-positive population (HR 0.39, CI 0.18 - 0.61, p=0.0015 [Figure 2C, 2D ]).

Wax is also the primary source of the much lower bee residues of the other major hive miticide, coumaphos, as indicated by the highly significant correlation of wax and bee contents (wax coumaphos = 54.2 • bee coumaphos +1383 ppb; r 2 = 0.484, p = 0.0015, n = 58) compared to the non-significant correlation of pollen and bee residues (r 2 = 0.00585, p = 0.630, n = 42).

The efficacy of treatment protocols summarised in Table 3 indicates a highly significant difference between the two approaches ( p = 0.0015).