“highly significant”

However, the differences were highly significant between the CG (control group) and the studied groups (BCT+ALND, BCT+SLNB) for the following parameters: BETA angle of thoracolumbar spine inclination ( p = 0.002), GAMMA angle of thoracic spine inclination ( p = 0.0044), TKA (thoracic kyphosis angle) ( p < 0.0001) and shoulder level inclination ( p = 0.0004).

In the case of IL-17A, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was highly significant ( P = .002): an IL-17A production threshold of greater than 28.1 ng/mL produced a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 91.7% for detecting glucocorticoid resistance.

90 minutes of exposure to UV light resulted in a highly significant (p<0.002, n = 20) increase of gross O 2 production in the Ageladine A treatments vs. the controls (2.34 ± 0.38 and 0.92 ± 0.32% h -1 , respectively; Fig 1b ).

After long storage difference in the yield of IS and GA was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

Whether the child was born in or immigrated to Canada was also highly significant in the unadjusted model ( p = 0.002); children born in Canada spent an average of 8.0 h (95% CI = 7.5–8.5 h/week) playing outdoors per week, while newcomer children spent less, an average of only 6.2 h (95% CI = 5.2–7.2 h/week) per week.

For brodifacoum and bromadiolone, these differences were highly significant (i.e. p ≤ 0.002; Table 1 ).

The prolonged implant survival for the membrane-group is highly significant (p=0.002).

Analysis of the first 15-min time-window only, the point at which morphine-induced locomotion was typically largest, revealed a highly significant drug × day interaction [F(3,18) = 7.35; p = 0.002], reflecting the widening difference between saline and drug days as conditioning progressed: activity increased across morphine days, but decreased across saline days.

The model was highly significant but explained only about 17% of the variation in 6-week EPDS score ( n = 46; p = 0.002, Adj R 2 = 0.174).

Table 2 shows a highly significant correlation between a family history of oral cancer and awareness of risk factors for oral cancer ( P = 0.002), with 95% of respondents with a family history of oral cancer having knowledge of risk factors for mouth cancer in the highest category.

Weight and SMA loss significantly increased over time, with a highly significant difference between the mean percentages of SMA at C3 and weight loss ( F = 10.99 [df=1], p = 0.002).

However, APD activity had a highly significant ( p = 0.002, adj.

However, the heat stressed colonies exhibited a highly significant 12% (light) and 11% (dark) decline in PQH 2 at the end of the experiment (at t = 17 d, mean = 78.9 ± 3.5% and 76.2 ± 5.1%; respectively; p < 0.002).

Remarkably, a support-vector machine-based multiparameter classificator built on these data achieved highly significant prediction performance with a balanced accuracy of 82.7% (Sens. = 76.5%, Spec. = 88.9%, p = 0.002, Fig. 1 a and Table 2 ).

As expected, the forwards had a substantially larger body mass than the back line, with highly significant differences observed in height, weight and measures of neck and chest circumference (p < 0.002).

There was a trendwise significant positive correlation ( p = 0.053) between the PB levels of CRP and G-CSF at LON start, and a highly significant correlation between CRP at LON start and the G-CSF levels at end of LON ( p = 0.002; Fig. 5 C).

PERMANOVA showed that the shifts in bacterial and fungal communities were highly significant ( p < 0.002; Table 2 ).

Figure 1 and Table 2 show a highly significant increase in the mean output of IL-1 β at space closure (228.49 ± 112.54 pg/min), compared with the baseline (59.53 ± 48.23 pg/min), p = 0.002.

Cutting speed itself contributed 20.99% and was highly significant (F = 539.29, p = 0.002).

This may seem quite a low value, however it should be noted that the distance varies from 0 to 380 (see Table 2 ), so the highly significant relation ( p = 0.002) will vary in this range.

In particular, a strong and highly significant correlation was found for samples from the North Region (n = 8, R 2 = 0.751, p < 0.002).

The treatment effect was highly significant (p = 0.002), with an adjusted mean change for the InterX group of -2.15 improvement vs. an adjusted mean change of improvement for the control group of -0.34.

5C ), partial mantel tests were performed, which detected highly significant IBD ( r = 0.7324, p = 0.002), but no IBE patterns in the populations studied.

Results Stiffness (S) showed highly significant differences (p = 0.002) with 202.25 ± 27.010 N/mm SD (Group 1) and 184.66 ± 35.875 N/mm SD (Group 2).

A highly significant reduction of PCT concentration on D(1) was observed in both groups (p = 0.002 in controlled, p = 0.005 in not controlled).