“highly significant”

A highly significant rightward shift in the ZSF1‐obese line was observed ( P = .002), while the slope was not different ( P = .19).

However, after standardizing the response within groups (sexes) as as (where i = individual, s = sex, and μ and σ = mean and standard deviation in baseline GCM), we found a highly significant effect of time using combined data from males and females ( F = 4.337, P = 0.002, n = 62).

We indeed found a highly significant enrichment of R151C in melanoma cases compared to non-cancer controls (p = 0.002, Fisher’s exact test, Supplementary Table S3 ) and borderline significant enrichment of V92M (p = 0.055, Fisher’s exact test) and R160W (p = 0.053, Fisher’s exact test).

The correlations between MV centric radial motion fraction and adipose tissue quantifications and patient biology were highly significant between cMr R and BSA (r = −0.49, p = 0.002) and between cMr R and BMI (r = −0.44, p = 0.005).

The mean duration of motor block was more in Group III (156.66 ± 5.62), followed by Group II (139.16 ± 4.16) and Group I (124.50 ± 8.34), which was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.002).

A t -test calculated across all farms confirmed the difference between the two site categories to be highly significant (p = 0.002).

The prolonged implant survival for the membrane-group is highly significant (p=0.002).

This reflects highly significant association between HSG tubal pathology and PMH suggesting PID or tubal blockage, (P = 0.002, P = 0.018, respectively).

The difference was highly significant for letter fluency skills ( p = .002) but not for semantic fluency ( p = .08).

Lastly, binned into broad ethnic categories for the sake of a correlation analysis (and due to the relatively small sample size, see Table 2 ), we observed a highly significant correlation between the ROI quality score and ethnic origin (tau = −0.391, p = 0.002), with sessions from subjects of ethnicities likely to have higher hair occlusion (according to self-reported responses averaged by ethnicity) also having lower ROI quality scores (see Figure 9 left bottom).

M.HEALTHY, the comparison in girls resulted in a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002), whereas in boys the significance was less pronounced ( p = 0.041).

A correlation test was thus performed between Kmax and the eye movement parameter, revealing a highly significant association between Kmax and the number of eye movements (Kendall’s Tau–B, 0.440, p = 0.002) (Fig. 1 ).

In this second group, 60% of the patient's had a cardiac structural abnormality to account for the cause of sudden death, versus 23% of the methadone subjects, a highly significant difference (p=0.002, Pearson chi-square) [ 68 ].

gelidum ( P = 0.012), highly significant for C. divergens ( P = 0.002), and extremely significant for C. maltaromaticum and L. gelidum subsp. gasicomitatum ( P = 0.0005; P = 0.0005), respectively.

We fit individual taxa using the function envfit , also in the vegan package, and subsequently filtered the taxa based on which had a highly significant correlation with the NMDS axes ( P ≤ 0.002; SI Appendix , Fig.

Considering five tests, findings were significant at the p = 0.01 level and highly significant at p = 0.002.

Interestingly, comparison between control tumors and shp16 methotrexate-treated tumors was highly significant both at day 30 ( P = 0.002) and at the timepoint when all shp16 mice had reach endpoint (day 55, P < 0.001), although we do note variability in this experiment ( Supplementary Fig.

The difference between the two groups of attempters remained highly significant ( p = 0.002). 3.5.

In our previous studies (1) 12 twin pairs analyzed (gut microbial profiling) using PLS-DA showed highly significant correlations between pairs ( 53 ) and (2) examination of 136 samples from 32 patients ( n = 20 NEC or LOS) showed significant differences ( p = 0.002) in microbiomic patterns between diseased and healthy individuals ( 24 ).

Strigiformes generally have a lower inner claw curvature than other raptors, with the difference highly significant (99.8%) for D-II (Strigiformes mean = 92.256 degrees, σ = 17.220; Accipitridae + Falconidae + Pandionidae mean = 112.823, σ = 15.964; t 29 = −3.185, p = 0.002).

In group A, there was no difference between pre- and postoperative scores ( p = 0.279), whereas in group B, a highly significant difference was observed ( p = 0.002).

Applying sFRP3 values to the fully adjusted regression model resulted in highly significant continuous net reclassification improvements for the primary endpoint, all cause and CV mortality, coronary events and sudden death (range 0.24–0.31; p ≤0.002 for all).

The model was highly significant but explained only about 17% of the variation in 6-week EPDS score ( n = 46; p = 0.002, Adj R 2 = 0.174).

The positivity of Her2/neu (3+) was associated with both adenocarcinoma cases (17.5%) and a case of high-grade dysplasia (14.3%), this correlation was highly significant (P < 0.002) ( Table 3 ).

The interaction of session by feedback order was highly significant, indicating that this difference in mean rate between sessions was 14 cpm less (95% CI −22 to −5, p=0.002) in those given feedback first compared with those given it second.