The difference in the age distribution between the three groups was highly significant ( P = 0.003, Kruskal-Wallis test).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In contrast, assessment of two contextual parameters within the stroma IM region of tumors, i.e., the number of CD20 cells within 20 μm radii of CD20 and CD4 cells, termed the CD20 Cluster Score , yielded a highly significant association with OS (HR 0.38; p = .003).
The estimated pooled OR for both 2 trials shows a highly significant reduction of the risk of recurrence for patients receiving adoptive immunotherapy (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.71; p = 0.003; Fig. 2 ).
A comparison of the biology majors to the engineering majors (i.e., students majoring in biomedical or chemical engineering) on all six questions demonstrated that the overall differences between the two groups were highly significant ( N = 17 biology majors, N = 14 engineering majors; multivariate analysis of variance, p < 0.003).
On comparing between the markers CK-10 and CK-19, OOCs showed significant difference with P = 0.011 and EDCs showed highly significant difference with P = 0.003.
Patients with lower (low and intermediate-1)-risk MDS had almost 10 times lower PARP1 mRNA levels than patients with higher (intermediate-2 and high)-risk MDS (0.0155 versus 0.1500), and although some overlap exists, the result was highly significant (Independent Samples Mann–Whitney U Test, two-sided P =0.003; Figure 1d ).
However, for the girls, the effect of group*time was highly significant ( F (4) = 4.14, P = 0.003) with differences in cognitive scores between the exposed group and the control group at 81⁄2 y being significantly ( P < 0.01) higher than at all earlier times.
The post-intervention program revealed a highly significant improvement (with a highly significant difference, p < 0.003) in HbA1c post-intervention levels, which showed a significant improvement among the study group compared to the control group.
The effect of the odorous stimuli was, however, highly significant (GLMM, R 2 M = 0.10, R 2 C = 0.21, χ 2 = 13.618, P = 0.003) whereas we did not find a significant effect of season (χ 2 = 0.845, P = 0.358).
Indeed, a highly significant positive linear regression relation was found between fads2 expression levels in broodstock males and sperm motility (R 2 = 0.70; P = 0.003) (Fig. 3 ).
When these two variables were entered in a regression model, the overall model was highly significant [F(2,16) = 8.4, p = .003), explaining a large proportion of variance in social QoL (r 2 = 0.51).
As for ischemic myocardial segments, a highly significant difference was found in the number of segments showing inducible myocardial ischemia (from 7.3 ± 2.2 to 4.0 ± 2.7, p = 0.003; Fig. 3d ).
However, there was a highly significant BET effect ( p = 0.003), which, when coupled with the HS × BET interaction ( p = 0.031), clearly showed that the combination of BET and AOX, but not BET alone, protected against the negative effects of HS on MFI ( Table 5 ).
Results Allometric, Plastic, and Genetic Effects on Bark Allocation Trees at the drier site showed a lower percentage of bark volume (43%) compared to the moister site (47%; Table 3 ), an apparently modest difference but statistically highly significant [ F (1, 6) = 23.87, P = 0.003].
In the Djudjeko village, the values found were highly significant ( p = 0.0030), corresponding to an infection prevalence of 32% in women and 8.5% in men.
In this model a highly significant interaction was seen (F = 6.32, df = 2, 85.9, p = 0.003) between repeated cycles of treatment and short vs. long cycle interval, indicating a positive increase in oocyte numbers from cycle to cycle in Group 1 but no significant increase in Group 2.
Genotype GG was associated with significant increased risk of not responding to treatment by 4.25 times as compared with TT genotype ( p = 0.019) and the G allele was associated with highly significant risk of not responding to treatment by 2.56 times compared with the T allele ( p = 0.003).
3 were recorded in a ‘normoxic’ PO 2 above 16 kPa. Noteworthy is that extrapolation of these V̇O 2 values back to the origin to predict values for single flies is based on a highly significant ( P <0.003) linear regression.
Compared to our healthy cohort, the MWU indicated a highly significant difference for the CDT (FD −1.29 ± 1.37 vs. controls 0.038 ± 0.99; p = 0.003) and MPT (FD 1.51 ± 1.06 vs. controls 0.49 ± 0.94; p = 0.006) at the foot. 3.2.2.
The difference in the frequency of the causative variation in the patients (2/180 chromosomes) and the controls (0/800 chromosomes) is statistically highly significant (p=0.003).
We found that 18% of capsids were present outside RC-like inclusions in DMSO-treated cells compared to 6% in LatA-treated cells (3-fold decrease), and this difference was highly significant ( P = 0.003).
A higher three-year OS rate was found in the HS group, which was highly significant (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, P = 0.003; Figure 2(b) ).
trachomatis infection at multiple time points ( Table S2 ), and linear modeling of log 2 [IFNα2] with SNP and 70 h post-infection burden as covariates revealed the SNP effect was much larger (regression coefficient = −0.623 versus 0.017 for burden) and was highly significant, with a p value of 1.87 × 10 −13 (versus p = 0.003 for burden) ( Table S3 ).
A survival curve of the combined ICM groups partitioned by an R2I2 value of 1.03 is shown in Figure 7 ; a highly significant difference ( P =0.003, log rank) was observed.
The difference of difference in face response rate with upright and inverted orientation (calculated for each SZ and TD participant) was highly significant (SZ, 0.10 ± 0.09; Mdn, 0.09, 95% CI [0.06; 0.14]; TD, 0.31 ± 0.25; Mdn, 0.21, 95% CI [0.2; 0.42]; Mann–Whitney test, U = 114.5, p = 0.003, two-tailed; η 2 = 0.204; Fig. 4 ).