Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
A comparison of the biology majors to the engineering majors (i.e., students majoring in biomedical or chemical engineering) on all six questions demonstrated that the overall differences between the two groups were highly significant ( N = 17 biology majors, N = 14 engineering majors; multivariate analysis of variance, p < 0.003).
highly significantP =0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Patients with lower (low and intermediate-1)-risk MDS had almost 10 times lower PARP1 mRNA levels than patients with higher (intermediate-2 and high)-risk MDS (0.0155 versus 0.1500), and although some overlap exists, the result was highly significant (Independent Samples Mann–Whitney U Test, two-sided P =0.003; Figure 1d ).
highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
However, there was a highly significant BET effect ( p = 0.003), which, when coupled with the HS × BET interaction ( p = 0.031), clearly showed that the combination of BET and AOX, but not BET alone, protected against the negative effects of HS on MFI ( Table 5 ).
highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
In this model a highly significant interaction was seen (F = 6.32, df = 2, 85.9, p = 0.003) between repeated cycles of treatment and short vs. long cycle interval, indicating a positive increase in oocyte numbers from cycle to cycle in Group 1 but no significant increase in Group 2.
highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Compared to our healthy cohort, the MWU indicated a highly significant difference for the CDT (FD −1.29 ± 1.37 vs. controls 0.038 ± 0.99; p = 0.003) and MPT (FD 1.51 ± 1.06 vs. controls 0.49 ± 0.94; p = 0.006) at the foot. 3.2.2.
Cold-evoked potentials in Fabry disease and polyneuropathy.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne) · 2024 · PMC11133603
highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
trachomatis infection at multiple time points ( Table S2 ), and linear modeling of log 2 [IFNα2] with SNP and 70 h post-infection burden as covariates revealed the SNP effect was much larger (regression coefficient = −0.623 versus 0.017 for burden) and was highly significant, with a p value of 1.87 × 10 −13 (versus p = 0.003 for burden) ( Table S3 ).
highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference of difference in face response rate with upright and inverted orientation (calculated for each SZ and TD participant) was highly significant (SZ, 0.10 ± 0.09; Mdn, 0.09, 95% CI [0.06; 0.14]; TD, 0.31 ± 0.25; Mdn, 0.21, 95% CI [0.2; 0.42]; Mann–Whitney test, U = 114.5, p = 0.003, two-tailed; η 2 = 0.204; Fig. 4 ).
Face pareidolia in male schizophrenia.
Schizophrenia (Heidelb) · 2022 · PMC9751144