It shows that the intervention had a highly significant impact on the effect measure and increased the PRO-CM on average by 0.24 SD (95% CI [0.07, 0.40]; p = 0.005).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
We identified 175 and 189 probe sets (genes) with highly significant strain differences (p<0.005, Benjamini-Hochberg multiple test correction) at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively.
There was a highly significant difference between groups in whether or not the students entered specific medical terminology in the search engine ( χ 2 4 =16.6, P =.005).
As predicted, the statistical parametrical map (SPM) of this higher-order PPI again identified the left ventral ACC and was highly significant ( x − 10, y 42, z − 10; t = 6.03; p < .005, Family Wise Error (FWE), small volume corrected (svc); Fig. 1 C).
Results: The average ratio of maltose to sucrose ratio percentage reduction in high-caries group was 43.63% and 41.17% in no caries group which was highly significant ( P < 0.005) while the intergroup comparison was found statistically insignificant.
In contrast, F10 showed a highly significant difference (p > 0.005) (Supplementary Table 5).
This difference identifies a highly significant interaction between the two genes (Cox Proportional Hazards analysis; p = 0.005).
When compared to the baseline, the difference in mean gingival index score at different time intervals was highly significant ( P < 0.005) [ Table 2 ].
The connectograms display highly significant Pearson correlations ( p < 0.005), with p-values corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) method.
Quantitative analysis using Odyssey software revealed a highly significant statistical increase in JNK phosphorylation ( p = 0.005) in the PBMCs of rats 8 h after a single administration of plitidepsin ( Figure 6 B).
Highly significant proportions of patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and BOP were found to have severe periodontitis (p < 0.005, p = 0.002, and p = 0.001, respectively), while the presence of plaque was highly significant among those with moderate periodontitis (p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
These findings were statistically highly significant ( P = 0.005) when comparing teeth at 6- and 12-month intervals in Group III.
Furthermore, 42 metabolites showed a highly significant association with the maximal total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA )score during the course of the disease (i.e., Pearson’s correlation test, p -value < 0.005, and correlation factor > 0.6); these top-ranked metabolites included 23 amino acid metabolites and a subset of pregnenolone/progestin metabolites.
The 1,25(OH)D:25(OH)D ratio showed a highly significant inverse correlation with serum hepcidin concentrations in patients with IBD (Kendall τ 0.19, P = 0.005; Figure 4 a).
defensa was highly significant ( p < 0.005), producing 5.56 ± 0.62 nymphs per female, as compared to wheat aphids without H. defensa , producing only 1.75 ± 0.44 nymphs.
When surrounding SULT1E1 is compared to that in tumor tissue a highly significant and positive correlation is noticed (p < 0.005) (Table 3 ).
Patients aged 50 to 59 at diagnosis had a highly significant difference in survival ( p = 0.005) between the two delay groups, as did patients with ductal histology ( p < 0.001).
There was no significant difference between the means p=0.14 ( Figure 4A ) however paired analysis showed a highly significant reduction in albumin levels following fluticasone treatment at p<0.005 ( Figure 4B ).
Results There was a very highly significant ( p < 0.005) difference in E. faecalis count in all the groups on day 7 after placement of intracanal medicament, being highest in group IV followed by group II, group III, and group I.
Whereas compounds 6d and 6f showed a highly significant histopathological difference compared to the reference group (all p -value < 0.005).
The overall AMOVA test also showed a highly significant effect of land use ( P <0.005).
There was a highly significant correlation between the mean maternal plasma oxytocin and the week of gestation ( p < 0.005).
The results showed that AWS induced a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.005) in the blood ROS levels (18465 ± 1143 a. u.) as compared to CTR group (25201 ± 1255 a. u; Figure 7 ).
The comparison of these changes in the walking test between the two groups was highly significant (p = 0.005, Mann-Whitney, two- tailed test). 8.
A CV-ANOVA test showed highly significant variation related to the separation of groups: for plasma data: p -value = 0.005; for interstitial fluid data: p -value = 0.003; and for urine data: p -value = 0.003.