The median effect more accurately represents the protocol’s discriminative capacity, and all p-values were highly significant ( p < 0.005, majority p < 0.001), reducing concern about false positive findings.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
MDR‐TB prevalence was substantially higher in the TB–T2DM group (10 cases, 22.73%) compared to the nondiabetic group (nine cases, 6.52%) with statistically highly significant ( p = 0.005).
The Cyco group exhibited a highly significant increase in LDH levels from Day 1 to Day 3 (t-statistic = −7.48, p -value = 0.005).
In the merged set, the protective effect for haplogroup H was highly significant (OR = .82; 95% CI, .71–.94; P = .005) (Figure 2 A).
Highly significant proportions of patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and BOP were found to have severe periodontitis (p < 0.005, p = 0.002, and p = 0.001, respectively), while the presence of plaque was highly significant among those with moderate periodontitis (p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
Sampling day was highly significant when considering plant communities alone ( P = 0.005).
(2) When one uses a t -test for independent samples both the SNC and NN tests show highly significant differences between the DD and the TA4 (fourth graders with typical ability) children: t (47) = 2.965, p < 0.005 for the SNC test and t (49) = 3.185, p < 0.003 for the NN test.
oleracea ), spinach genotype (G), Fos inoculum density (I), and the interaction terms (G × I) had highly significant effects on FWSI 28, 35, and 42 DAP, as well as AUDPC values ( P < 0.005), but the G x I interaction effect on spinach dry biomass was not significant ( P = 0.3059) (Supplemental Table S2).
We used FLIM-FRET analysis to measure the NDC80 binding in groups of sister kinetochores with similar K-K distances, and observed a highly significant positive correlation (p<0.005) between NDC80 FRET fraction and K-K distance ( Figure 3D ).
The nonparametric mITT-LOCF analysis demonstrated a highly significant, medium to large superiority of Cerebrolysin relative to placebo from day 7 onwards, peaking at day 30, with an MW equal to 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.78; P=0.005; Fig. 2 ).
The standard error of the average mean difference in oxygen uptake, as determined by paired data analysis, was 1.13 and is highly significant (p < 0.005) .
Table 3 lists the top 20 miRNAs with highly significant correlations to phenotypes (p < 0.005).
All regression coefficients of the variable log (2) nHDL ox were highly significant (p < 0.005).
Correlations were flagged as highly significant at p≤0.005 and as significant when p≤0.05.
The log‐likelihood ratio test was highly significant ( p < 0.005, –log2(p) = 390.20), confirming the model's overall fit.
When the breathing rate values were compared across all 8 groups for each sound level, including silence, using the Friedman Test there was a highly significant difference ( p = 0.005, Friedman statistic 20.1).
Changes in lateral ventricle volumes were highly significant (p < 0.005) at D0 + 35 and already significant (p < 0.05) at D0 + 6 compared to the baseline.
We identified 362, 982, and 581 probe sets (genes) with highly significant expression differences between strains ( p < 0.005, Benjamini–Hochberg; FDR of 0.5%) at 2, 3, and 4 weeks, respectively.
BPAP resulted in a highly significant, incremental increase of 83.2 ± 55.64 s ( P = .0050).
Based on a bootstrap test for comparing AUC-ROCs of two ROC curves, the difference was highly significant for all datasets ( p < 0.005) except for Li2020 ( p = 0.018), and not significant for Carvalho2018 ( p = 0.33) and Ramella2018 ( p = 0.147).
Results Highly significant differences in birth weight-placental weight correlations were observed among acid phosphatase locus 1 phenotypes (p = 0.005).
In an ANCOVA model including this factor, the group effect remained highly significant ( p = .005).
A subsequent repeated measures ANOVA based on the three alignment conditions ( smooth , c-radial , jagged ) showed a highly significant effect of alignment [ F (1,9) = 13.9, p < 0.005].
In the ICAN data, Spearman correlational analyses between age and TBR for all permutations showed highly significant correlations (all Cz p < 0.005 unless stated otherwise), as expected, with the strongest correlations for the Session-based averaging method ( r = − 0.28; df = 234) followed by Welch (Hann) ( r = − 0.27; df = 234) and the weakest correlation for Trial based ( r = − 0.26; df = 234).
DS-GPA score showed a highly significant predictive power ( P < 0.005).