“highly significant”

This result was highly significant (p <0.005, Fisher's exact test).

Immediately after motor learning approach execution there was a highly significant difference in perceived exertion [χ 2 (2) = 10.765, p = 0.005] and mental effort [χ 2 (2) = 9.135, p = 0.01], but not for physical effort [χ 2 (2) = 1.188, p = 0.552].

A highly significant difference in infection rate ( p = 0.005) was observed as only 5/40 patients (12.5%) in the Synbiotic 2000-treated group suffered infections (4 wounds and one urinary tract infection) vs. 16/40 (40%) in the fiber-only group (6 wound infections, 5 peritonitis, 4 chest infections, 2 sepsis, and one of each of urinary tract infection, cholangitis and empyema)— Table 5 .

Further ANOVA analysis ( Table 2 ) performed for all the traits showed highly significant differences in the studied genotypes at P ≤ 0.005.

For both theta and delta measures, post hoc testing showed highly significant differences between Aβ − individuals with intact neurocognitive performance and both of the other groups (all p < 0.005).

Results Comparison of Two Insecticides Insecticide treatment was highly significant ( F 2,6 = 15.0, P < 0.005).

Intragroup analysis of visual gain over time was highly significant in PR-treated patients ( P = 0.005; Wilcoxon signed rank test) and significant in SB group ( P = 0.01).

This variable showed a highly significant, positive correlation with performance on the generalisation task for the entire body of participants ( r = 0.49, p = 0.005).

Only highly significant gene-sets (p < 0.005; FDR < 1%) are shown as nodes in the enrichment map.

The Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients indicates how well the model performs, and it generated a highly significant value ( p < 0.005) and a chi-square value of 57.133 with 4 degrees-of-freedom.

Product Use Correlations between saliva cotinine levels and number of cartridges/day were highly significant for study groups A and B, at week-6 (Rho = 0.90 for group A, p = 0.005; Rho = 0.74 for group B, p = 0.006, Spearman’s rank correlation) and at week-12 (Rho = 0.93 for group A, p<0.003; Rho = 0.95 for group B, p<0.0004).

In Model 2, all the scores were negative and the multivariate test highly significant ( p = 0.005).

The correlations between the two PEth homologues were highly significant and increased during the study: rs = 0.705 ( p = 0.005, n = 14) at baseline and rs = 0.918 ( p = 0.000, n = 21) after 2 weeks of alcohol consumption.

However, performing the auditory discrimination task enhanced zMEPamp across all movies compared to the single task conditions as indicated by a highly significant Task main effect (F(1,13) = 17.769, p<.005).

We found a highly significant association between the presence of vascular invasion and low BMI-1 mRNA expression ( P =0.005, Figure 1B , Table 2 ).

The total indirect effect was highly significant ( β = 0.106, P = 0.005).

We compared the peak responses of the striosomal and matrix samples during the tone presentation period for the acquisition, post-criterion and overtraining sessions ( Figure 7C ), and found a highly significant interaction (ANOVA interaction p<0.005).

Among the 32 subjects in the bryostatin treatment group in the Moderate Stratum Cohort in the #203 study, we found a difference = 4.1 points (with imputed data) in the mean SIB at week 13 from baseline (See Table 5 below), a result that is highly significant ( p = 0.005).

It means that the confidence intervals around the correlations are relatively wide, but even so the sex difference in the size of correlations between markers is highly significant ( p = 0.005) and is probably genuine.

This supplementary analysis confirmed a highly significant community separation with remarkably robust explanatory power (Adonis: R 2 = 0.83, p = 0.005).

This result was highly significant (p=0.005).

At these thresholds, the Kaplan-Meier analyses based on PFS ( Figure 4a ) and OS ( Figure 4b ) both show highly significant differences between patients scoring below the threshold and those scoring at or above it: PFS analysis p <0.005, OS analysis p = 0.002.

PRLR −/− mice exhibited a basal body weight lower than those of wild type mice [15] , but PEG-SMLA treatment induced a similar highly significant ( p< 0.005) increased mass change in the WT and PRLR −/− treated mice ( Figure 1A ), which was quantified in Figure 1B .

Although the performance is very similar between the raw Shannon and raw KL scores, the difference is highly significant (p<0.005, binomial test excluding ties).

The linear effect ( X 1 ), squared effect ( X 1 2 ) as well as interactive effect ( X 1 X 2 ) were highly significant ( P value < 0.005).