“highly significant”

If the cell pH in the experimental period is compared with the average of the control and recovery periods, the difference, 0.04 t 0.01 pH unit, is highly significant (p < 0.005). 592 THE JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY " VOLUME 89 - 1987 The cell pH response both in the absence of luminal Na (OpH = 0.04 0.01) and in the absence of capillary Na (OpH = 0.07 0.02) is significantly lower than that seen in the presence of Na on both sides of the cells (p < 0.05 for both comparisons).

In addition, there was a highly significant difference between PQS counts ( P < 0.005) in breakpoints and shuffled sequences.

Regarding the number of cases outside of the three-degree safety zone (outliers), there were six cases among the 11 with the conventional procedure and only two cases among the 25 navigated cases, thus presenting a highly significant difference with p = 0.005 ( Table 3 ).

This reduction in tubule area proved highly significant ( P < 0.005), such that the mice treated with LH2Auristatin and FSH2Menadione/LH2Auristatin exhibited a 40% reduction in mean tubule area compared to the testes of the control group.

The difference was highly significant ( P = 0.005).

The tendency of interaction was highly significant ( p < 0.005).

Cormorant sex and mean fish length per pellet were highly significant constraints in all CCAs ( p < 0.005; Table 2 ) with nonoverlapping confidence areas between the two sexes for the total dataset and the breeding season 2012 (Figure 6 ).

All data were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.005).

normal mucosa were highly significant for hOGG1 ( p < 0.005), RAD51 ( p < 0.001), MTH1 ( p < 0.04) and MUTYH ( p < 0.01), indicating enhanced DNA repair activity in these tumor cells. 2.3.

Compared with the control group, there was a significant difference from the 5th day ( p < 0.05), and the greater significant difference ( p < 0.0005) appeared from the 8th day and remained until the end of the experiment; the rVP24-fed maggot group maintained the greater significant difference from 6th to 14th days; the normal maggot group and pET28b-fed maggot group maintained the highly significant differences ( p < 0.005) from 6th to 14th days.

Disease-related increases in mean øLTC and øLTD levels (7.1- and 4.6-fold) are highly significant ( P = .0050 and P = .0012, respectively).

Post-hoc analysis (Tukey) showed that the difference between morning-esophagus and morning-rock and between morning-esophagus and afternoon-esophagus were highly significant (P<0.005 and P<0.008, respectively), with no significant difference between morning and afternoon on rocks and between esophagus and rocks in the afternoon ( Figure 4A ).

A permutation test (199 permutations) was conducted and the model found to be highly significant (P = 0.005 in both dataset).

Table 3 lists the top 20 miRNAs with highly significant correlations to phenotypes (p < 0.005).

Our study found the difference in mortality rates between the non-TCM patients and the Danshen-used group was highly significant ( p = 0.005), indicating that Danshen treatment improved the survival rate of patients with osteosarcoma (Fig. 1a ).

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.005) and relates to Fe and Zn concentrations.

The Kaplan–Meier analysis for postoperative visual acuity demonstrated a highly significant difference, with a log‐rank test statistic of 35.98 and a p value of < 0.005 (−log 2 ( p ) = 28.9).

Weighted UniFrac analysis was highly significant (p = 0.005), confirming that humans lacking B. coli ASVs harbored a markedly distinct community of potentially pathogenic eukaryotes compared to pigs (p = 0.005) ( Table 2 ).

As an example, in Figure 7B , we show analyses of the two genes CCNE1 and USH1C , demonstrating a highly significant change in skipping exon 9 or exon 11, respectively ( P values < 0.005).

Only highly significant gene-sets (p < 0.005; FDR < 1%) are shown as nodes in the enrichment map.

Principal findings Immunization of outbred mice with MAP-2 in combination with alum and/or MAP-1 elicited highly significant ( P < 0.005) reduction of around 60% in challenge S . mansoni worm burden and no increase in worm eggs’ loads or vitality, compared to unimmunized or alum pre-treated control mice.

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a highly significant divergence in event-free survival favoring the SGLT2i group (Log-rank P = 0.005) ( Figure 3 ).

In contrast, associations between SXL and CstF64, SXL and the hnRNP core, and PSI and the hnRNP core were marginally statistically significant in the G test but were highly significant (P < 0.005) in all three Monte Carlo simulations, even when heterogeneity in composition and overlap between the sites were accounted for.

The comparison of pain perception in the laser and placebo conditions by Mann-Whitney U test depicted a highly significant statistical difference with a P value of < 0.005.

We found a highly significant correlation only for the DPB1 gene ( Figure 10 ; r = 0.589, P = 0.005, N = 21 alleles).