“highly significant”

It was observed from the K–M curves that the difference in the survival of melanoma patients was highly significant ( p < 0.005) ( Figure 4E ).

Correlation between airborne endotoxin and TSP was weak but highly significant (p < 0.005).

The results of this model show no significant effect (p = 0.18; statistical power [95% CI] = 42.60% [39.51, 45.73]) of the rank on perseveration but there was a highly significant effect (p = 0.005) of centrality on perseveration, the most central individuals made less perseverative errors ( Fig 3 ).

Further comparisons demonstrated that CSEO was significantly more effective than the reference group in modulating oxidative stress parameters (* p < 0.05), with highly significant differences noted for certain markers (*** # p < 0.005).

Statistical significance was interpreted as follows: p > 0.05, not significant (ns); p < 0.05, significant (∗); p < 0.01, highly significant (∗∗); p < 0.005, very highly significant (∗∗∗); and p < 0.001, extremely significant (∗∗∗∗).

In patients, the “A” allele frequency was 84.5%, a highly significant enrichment (e.g., 8.3% increase) compared to population controls at 76.2% ( p < 0.005).

This higher Ecklonia cover was found to be highly significant when assessed using PERMANOVA across the six marine reserves with fished reference sites ( P = 0.005, Table 6 ).

The correlation between the assays in prepandemic samples was also highly significant ( p = 0.005) whereas it did not reach statistical significance in the pandemic samples.

Preliminary analyses of the DNA methylation data showed a highly significant (season of conception) × (year of conception) interaction (P = 0.005), indicating that the effect of seasonality was not consistent in all years.

Results There was a very highly significant ( p < 0.005) difference in E. faecalis count in all the groups on day 7 after placement of intracanal medicament, being highest in group IV followed by group II, group III, and group I.

Intragroup analysis of visual gain over time was highly significant in PR-treated patients ( P = 0.005; Wilcoxon signed rank test) and significant in SB group ( P = 0.01).

This association was highly significant also in the subset of conventional variant PTC ( P = 0.005) and marginally significant in follicular variant PTC ( P = 0.06).

KPS < 70 was highly significant (median 4.2 versus 8.9 months, p = 0.005).

There was a highly significant improvement in fatigue at week 4, compared to baseline, in the group on the active drug (p = 0.005), and an almost significant improvement in the placebo treated group, p = 0.053 (Friedman Test), Figure 2 .

The best concordance with microarray analysis was observed for hsa-miR-143-3p, hsa-miR-205-5p and hsa-miR-4417, which also had highly significant differences in Table 3 (adjusted p values < 0.005).

Percentage reduction of IS was highly significant between time t0 and t1 ( p = 0.005), and t0 and t2 ( p = 0.005), also with a significant reduction between t1 and t2 ( p = 0.012).

In contrast, the EV-MP group demonstrated a robust upregulation around 20-fold for CD163 and around 7-fold for CCL18, which were highly significant ( p < 0.005) compared to both MP and F-MP groups.

1A ), which was highly significant ( P < 0.005, log-rank test).

The results of three experiments were highly significant ( P < 0.005).

This correlation is very interesting because 18 pregnancies began within the first 30 days (45%) after HyCoSy with a highly significant difference ( p <0.005) compared to the remaining 22 pregnancies that had a homogeneous distribution in the following months ( Figure 1 ).

Differences were considered insignificant (=) at p > 0.05, statistically significant (*) at 0.005 < p < 0.05, highly significant (**) at 0.0005 < p < 0.005 and very highly significant (***) at p < 0.0005. 2.6.

The difference between the two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.005).

We found the highly significant three-way interaction between species, time, and BMCS presence (F = 3.864, P = 0.005).

There was a highly significant correlation found between NAD(P)H autofluorescence and hepatic HbsO 2 detected in the same animal ( p < 0.005; r 2 = 0.94), as depicted in Figure 3 .

There was a statistically significant within group improvement in VAS pain scores from baseline at all timepoints for the PRG combined group, with highly significant improvements seen at months 3, 6, 9 and 12 (p ≤ 0.005) while VAS pain scores in the placebo group showed marginal improvement.