Highly significant (4.26-fold, P ≤0.005) reduction in tumor volume was observed using an in vivo mouse xenograft colon cancer model.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Results Multivariable analysis revealed that out of several variables studied six dichotomized features: namely: cigarette smoking, lack of chemotherapy, palliative doses of radiotherapy, high OPN concentration, advanced T stage and high VEGF concentration had a highly significant ( p < 0.005) and independent influence on overall survival in the group of 337 patients.
Grain quality There was a highly significant ( p < 0.005) cultivar × fungicide strategy effect on 100 grain weight ( Table 13 ) and cultivar and treatment effect on SSI ( 1Supplementary Data S3 ).
Relationships to latitude (all species; or with species grouped by PFT) were quantified with ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions – including a quadratic term, as this clearly improved the fit to data and the quadratic term was in all cases highly significant (all P ≤ 0.005).
Only variables with highly significant coefficients (adjusted P < 0.005) were included in the final model.
Reaction times There was a main effect of SemD that was highly significant by subjects and marginal by items, F 1 (1,22) = 9.99, p = .005; F 2 (1,235) = 2.80, p = .096: Responses to high SemD words were on average 12 ms faster than responses to low SemD words.
This variable showed a highly significant, positive correlation with performance on the generalisation task for the entire body of participants ( r = 0.49, p = 0.005).
For each of these 2 age cutoffs, the difference in cup volumes between the older and younger tamoxifen users was highly significant (p ≤ .005).
Throughout the dates, varroa load was highly significant in colonies of the treated cornfields compared to those of the untreated ones (T = 2.81, P = 0.005) ( Table 2 ).
The comparison of pain perception in the laser and placebo conditions by Mann-Whitney U test depicted a highly significant statistical difference with a P value of < 0.005.
Even in the fully controlled specification (Model 5), the gap between Baby Boomers and Millennials remains highly significant (0.030, p = 0.005), while the gap between Boomers and Gen Z drops to marginal significance ( p = 0.064).
This difference was highly significant (P = 0.005).
(2) When one uses a t -test for independent samples both the SNC and NN tests show highly significant differences between the DD and the TA4 (fourth graders with typical ability) children: t (47) = 2.965, p < 0.005 for the SNC test and t (49) = 3.185, p < 0.003 for the NN test.
Individual dietary knowledge and the percentage of time spent arboreal indeed showed a highly significant positive correlation (Pearson correlation: n = 10, r = 0.81, p = 0.005).
This difference in labeling was highly significant with p = 0.005.
Trainees showed a negative correlation between objectivism and regret (r = -0.309; p = 0.003), however faculty did not (r = 0.120; p = 1.00); the difference between these two correlations was highly significant (p = 0.005).
We found a highly significant association between the presence of vascular invasion and low BMI-1 mRNA expression ( P =0.005, Figure 1B , Table 2 ).
CCA IMT was higher in obese subjects as compared with controls, and the difference between the two groups remained highly significant ( P =0.005) after adjustment for BP and metabolic variables ( Table 4 ).
The removal of one influential data point (see figure 1 ) weakened these relationships, becoming non-significant for ROUTINE ( p = 0.27), marginally significant for OXPHOS ( p = 0.057) but remaining highly significant for ETS ( p = 0.005).
In terms of C54 TAG species, there was no significant change in the amount of C54 : 3 (−3%), but highly significant decreases in C54 : 4 (−19%; P < 0.005), C54 : 5 (−25%, P < 0.0001) and C54 : 6 (−32%, P < 0.00005).
While, thrombin and bleeding time were also prolonged in dose dependent manner which is highly significant ( p ≤ 0.005) as compared to control.
In contrast, comparing the slopes for non-AHRs between rural and urban areas reveals a highly significant difference (p < 0.005) with a diverging trend by the end of the time interval.
We found that as planted-species richness increased, there was a highly significant increase in the percentage of pots with light interception efficiency higher than that A . filiforme monoculture ( Fig 6 , r = 0.664, n = 16, P = 0.005) and also the percentage of pots with soil water content lower than that in P . scabiosaefolia monoculture ( r = 0.553, n = 16, P = 0.033).
Although no significant difference of HAMD-17 score was observed between non-suicidal MDD and suicidal-MDD groups (Z = -1.212; p = 0.225), a highly significant correlation with HAMD-17 score was apparent for CpG4 methylation (r = -0.287; p = 0.005), but not for CpG2 (r = -0.024; p = 0.820) (Figure 5 ).
Highly significant p -values were also found for the peaks 2362, 3059, and 3938 with p -values < 0.005.