“highly significant”

However, a highly significant difference was observed in the number of syllables produced per DDK trial (U = 28,000; p = 0.006); school-aged children produced a higher number of syllables.

Separate analyses of the stimulus category for the time windows revealed no effects for s1 and s2 ( p > 0.10), and highly significant effects for s3, F (2,84) = 5.76, p = 0.006, η 2 = 0.12, s4, F (2,84) = 9.05, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.18, and s5, F (2,84) = 9.40, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.18, after stimulus onset (see also Figure 3A ).

Random intercept for Participant was significant [β = 1.728, SE = 0.086, 95% CI = [1.56, 1.90], t (47.99) = 20.117, p < 0.001] and fixed-effects factor WordOrder was highly significant [β = −0.098, SE = 0.035, 95% CI = [−0.17, −0.03], t (808.19) = −2.78, p = 0.006].

The difference between the two treatment groups was highly significant ( P = 0.006).

Thus, we were able to show two highly significant associations of the first SNP373 with the accumulation of the two unsaturated fatty acids, oleic acid ( p = 0.006) and linoleic acid ( p = 0.013).

Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to have a recurrence during weeks 2, 3, and 4 of follow-up than were younger patients, and the difference between the 2 groups was highly significant by log rank and Wilcoxon tests ( P = .006 and P = .01, respectively).

Additionally, a highly significant microplastic exposure × contestant role interaction was found for the ‘duration of rapping bouts' ( F 1 = 7.73, p = 0.006).

The model was highly significant, F (3, 22) = 5.583, p = 0.006 and explained 42% of the variance (30% was explained by the “Long-short tones” difference, 12% by Phoneme deletion, and 1% by Pattern discrimination scores).

This relationship remained highly significant when adjusting for starting dose categorically (aHR = 1.717, 95% CI: 1.17, 2.52, P = .006) or continuously (aHR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.43, P = .008).

Those receiving the food waste message responded with a highly significant reduction ( p = 0.006).

Comparison of binding parameters revealed a highly significant (p = 0.006) decrease in competitive potency for MLA+T30 (IC50 = 15.5±0.7 nM) as compared with MLA alone (IC50 = 9.5±0.4 nM; Fig. 3D ).

Meta-analysis of 13 studies with a total of 449 participants demonstrated a highly significant large increase in serum ferritin concentration after OIS (SMD = 1.27, 95% CI 0.44–2.10, p = 0.006, I 2 = 90; EXP PRE mean ± SD = 20.4 ± 10.9, EXP POST = 30.3 ± 12.4; CON PRE = 20.0 ± 10.8; CON POST = 21.5 ± 10.7) (Fig. 3 ).

Gazelle abundance levels off into the PPNA, declines in the EPPNB, and declines further in the MPPNB (difference between NAT&PPNA and E&MPPNB assemblages is highly significant; t = −5.308; df = 3; p = 0.006).

In the two age groups considered, the preoperative NLR ratio was highly significant for the population over >40 years old with a value equal or greater than 3 (p = 0.006).

Post-hoc Bonferroni comparisons showed a statistically highly significant difference between DPI and Pyrax (p=0.006) and a significant difference between DPI and Quick Ashvin (p=0.028).

During spontaneous attacks, the difference between placebo and sumatriptan was not significant at 2 h ( p = 0.26), but it was highly significant at 4 h ( p = 0.006).

The regression was highly significant ( F 1,38 = 8.594, P = 0.006), with a coefficient of determination, r 2 = 0.193 ( Figure 2 ).

Conclusion: Association of thrombocytopenia in dengue parameter-positive cases was highly significant (Z = 2.76, P = 0.006) when compared to thrombocytopenia in dengue parameter-negative patients.

Thus, when comparing anatomical locations, in the cervix 2.0% of the HPV16 samples had a mutation in the E6 gene versus 18.5% in the oropharynx, demonstrating a highly significant difference (p = 0.006).

Stratified analyses showed that the association between urinary BPA levels and PCa is highly significant ( p = 0.006) among the 30 patients <65 years old (mean and median age = 58, minimum age = 46) but that this association does not reach significance among the half of patients >65 years ( Fig. 1 ).

The univariate analysis of covariance comparing the two groups at time point C3, while controlling for baseline levels was, however, highly significant ( F (1,16) = 10.05, P = 0.006, ω 2 = 0.32), with higher cortisol levels in the provoked group.

The difference between groups A and B was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.006).

Additionally, a highly significant ( P =.006) reduction in total cholesterol/HDL was also noted following 12 weeks of CAPROS supplementation ( Fig. 1 ).

The cellulite clinical score after pinching This evaluation also proved an additional beneficial effect of the topical treatment, because the difference in the evolution of the score between T0 and T4 weeks was highly significant in favour of the topically treated side ( P = 0.006) at T4 weeks ( Fig. 2 ).

fluminea (Independent-samples Test, F = 0.239, P = 0.022) and a highly significant difference in the medium size (Independent-samples Test, F = 1.512, P = 0.006).